Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Protective values for soil lead with respect to child health: a critique of UK guidelines

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2002, The (UK) Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) together with the Environment Agency published document SGV10 “Contaminants in soil: collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans. Lead”. This publication sets out the derivation of Soil Guideline Values for lead contamination. Values for soil lead that are protective of the health of children and also for adults are derived using the model recommended by an international task force working under the auspices of the Society for Environmental Geochemistry and Health (SEGH) (Wixson and Davies 1993, 1994). Detailed examination of the DEFRA publication shows it uses unrealistic values for two variables in the SEGH model. The consequence is both actual and has potential adverse societal impacts. These impacts could be avoided if the appropriate scientific community were regarded as stakeholders in the legislative outcome and not simply the providers of the research data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, E., Cambra, K., & Martinez, T. (2001). Lead and cadmium exposure from contaminated soil among residents of a farm area near an industrial site. Archives of Environmental Health, 56, 278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alloway, B. J., & Davies, B. E. (1971). Trace element content of soils affected by base metal mining in Wales. Geoderma, 5, 197–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bornschein, R. L., Clark, C. S., Grote, J., Road, S., & Succop, P. (1989). Soil lead-blood lead relationships in a former lead mining town. In B. E. Davies & B. G. Wixson (Eds.), Lead in Soil: Issues and guidelines (pp. 149–160). Northwood: Science Reviews Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (2002). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Managing elevated blood lead levels among young children: Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. Atlanta: CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, J. J. (2001). The road to primary prevention of lead toxicity in children. Pediatrics, 107, 581–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter-Howells, J., & Thornton, I. (1991). Sources and pathways of environmental lead to children in a Derbyshire mining village. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 13, 127–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culbard, E. B., Thornton, I., Watt, J., Wheatley, M., Moorcroft, S., & Thompson, M. (1988). Metal contamination in British urban dusts and soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 17, 226–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. E. (1978). Plant-available lead and other metals in British garden soils. Science of the Total Environment, 9, 243–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. E., & Holmes, P. L. (1972). Lead contamination of roadside soil and grass in Birmingham, England, in relation to naturally occurring levels. Journal Agricultural Science (Cambridge), 79, 479–484.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. E., and Wixson, B. G. (Eds.). (1988). Lead in soil: Issues and guidelines. In: Proceedings of a conference in Chapel Hill, NC, USA (p 315). Northwood, England: Science Reviews.

  • DD. (2006) Guidance for development, or change of use, on land falling within the target area for lead (Pb) contamination. Derbyshire Dales District Council, Matlock, England.

  • DEFRA. (2002) Soil guideline values for lead contamination (p 20). Bristol, UK : R&D Publication SGV 10 Environment Agency.

  • DEFRA. (2005). Soil guideline values and the determination of land as contaminated land under Part IIA CLAN 2/05 (p 3). Bristol, UK: Environment Agency.

  • DEFRA. (2006). Soil guideline values: the way forward (p 38). Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, England.

  • DEFRA CLR 10. (2002). The contaminated land exposure assessment (CLEA) model: Technical basis and algorithms (p 20). Bristol, UK: Environment Agency.

  • Duggan, M. J., & Inskip, M. J. (1985). Childhood exposure to lead in surface dust and soil: A community health problem. Public Health Reviews, 13, 1–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register. (2001). Environmental Protection Agency: Lead, identification of dangerous levels of lead; final rule, 40 CFR Part 745, Washington DC

  • Jin, A., Teschke, K., & Copes, R. (1997). The relationship of lead in soil to lead in blood and implications for standard setting. The Science of The Total Environment, 208, 23–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lanphear, B. P., Succop, P., Roda, S., & Henningsen, G. (2003). The effect of soil abatement on blood lead levels in children living near a former smelting and milling operation. Public Health Reports, 118, 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Riche, H. H. (1968). Metal contamination of soil in the Woburn market-garden experiment resulting from the application of sewage sludge. Journal Agricultural Science (Cambridge), 71, 205–208.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C. (2003) A century of labour market change: 1900 to 2000: Labour Market trends, March 2003

  • Marcus, A. H., & Cohen, J. (1988). Modelling the blood lead-soil lead relationship. In B. E. Davies & B. G. Wixson (Eds.), Lead in soil: Issues and guidelines (pp. 161–174). Northwood: Science Reviews Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, S., Flynn, M., Owen, L., Humphreys, C., Woodfield, S. (2004) Changing work in later life: A study of job transitions. Centre for Research into the Older Workforce, University of Surrey, March 2004, p. 93.

  • Nriagu, J. O. (1990). The rise and fall of leaded gasoline. The Science of the Total Environment, 92, 13–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, M. B., & Bellinger, D. C. (1988). Soil lead-blood lead relationship among Boston children. Bulletin Environmental Toxicology and Health, 41, 791–797.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Lindern, I. H., Spalinger, S. M., Bero, B. N., Petrosyan, V., & von Braun, M. C. (2003). The influence of soil remediation on lead in house dust: The Science of The Total Environment, 303, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, H. V., & Delavault, R. E. (1971). Variations in the copper, zinc, lead, and molybdenum contents of some vegetables and their supporting soils. Geological Society America Memoirs, 123, 97–108.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wixson, B. G., & Davies, B. E. (1993). “Lead in Soil” task force: Recommended guidelines: Northwood, England, Science Reviews, p. 132.

  • Wixson, B. G., & Davies, B. E. (1994). Guidelines for lead in soil. Environmental Science and Technology, 28, 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clemson University, 107 Teeside Drive, Anderson, SC, 29625, USA

    Brian E. Davies

Authors
  1. Brian E. Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian E. Davies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, B.E. Protective values for soil lead with respect to child health: a critique of UK guidelines. Environ Geochem Health 30, 639–646 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-008-9192-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-008-9192-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation