Skip to main content
Log in

Mixing rates in stably stratified flows with respect to the turbulent froude number and turbulent scales

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this analysis the quantification of diapycnal diffusivity \(K_\rho\) in stratified flows such as those found in the ocean and atmosphere is explored. There are two simplifications that are routinely made when estimating mixing rates in stably stratified flows. First, a constant value is commonly assumed for the (irreversible) mixing coefficient \(\Gamma\). Second, dissipation rates of turbulent kinetic energy \(\epsilon\) are inferred using either the Thorpe (or Ellison) length scales or from microstructure measurements using the isotropy assumption. Data from three independent direct numerical simulations of homogeneous stratified turbulence are used as a testbed to highlight impacts of these assumptions on estimates of \(K_\rho\). A systematic analysis compares the inferred diffusivities to exact DNS diffusivities as a function of the turbulent Froude number \(Fr_t\). Use of a constant \(\Gamma\) results in an under-prediction of \(K_\rho\) by up to a factor of 5 for strongly stratified conditions (low \(Fr_t\)) and an over-prediction of \(K_\rho\) by up to two orders of magnitude in weakly stratified conditions (high \(Fr_t\)). The use of inferred dissipation rates \(\epsilon\) based on the assumption of isotropy results in an over-prediction of \(K_\rho\) by a factor of 2 for low \(Fr_t\) (which is within the instrumentation error) and converges on the exact \(K_\rho\) for \(Fr_t \ge 1\). However, the use of kinematic length scales, such as the Thorpe or Ellison scales, to infer \(\epsilon\) result in significant errors. The implications of these findings are applied in a simple demonstration to show how these tools can be used for improved estimates of mixing rates in stably stratified flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arthur RS, Venayagamoorthy SK, Koseff JR, et al (2017) How we compute N matters to estimates of mixing in stratified flows. J Fluid Mech 831(R2)

  2. Bouffard D, Boegman L (2013) A diapycnal diffusivity model for stratified environmental flows. Dyn Atmos Oceans 61:14–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chalamalla VK, Sarkar S (2015) Mixing, dissipation rate, and their overturn-based estimates in a near-bottom turbulent flow driven by internal tides. J Phys Oceanogr 45(8):1969–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Danaila L, Voivenel L, Varea E (2017) Self-similarity criteria in anisotropic flows with viscosity stratification. Phys Fluids 29(2):020716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dillon TM (1982) Vertical overturns: a comparison of Thorpe and Ozmidov length scales. J Geophys Res Oceans 87(C12):9601–9613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellison T (1957) Turbulent transport of heat and momentum from an infinite rough plane. J Fluid Mech 2(5):456–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernando H (1991) Mixing efficiency in stratified shear flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:455–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garanaik A, Venayagamoorthy SK (2018) Assessment of small-scale anisotropy in stably stratified turbulent flows using direct numerical simulations. Phys Fluids 30(126):602

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garanaik A, Venayagamoorthy SK (2019) On the inference of the state of turbulence and mixing efficiency in stably stratified flows. J Fluid Mech 867:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gargett AE (1988) The scaling of turbulence in the presence of stable stratification. J Geophys Res Oceans 93(C5):5021–5036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garrett C (2001) Stirring and mixing: What are the rate-controlling processes? Victoria University (British Columbia), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Technical report

  12. Gregg MC, D’Asaro E, Riley JJ et al (2018) Mixing efficiency in the ocean. Ann Rev Mar Sci 10:443–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holford JM, Linden P (1999) Turbulent mixing in a stratified fluid. Dyn Atmos Oceans 30(2–4):173–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Howland CJ, Taylor JR, Caulfield C (2020) Mixing in forced stratified turbulence and its dependence on large-scale forcing. J Fluid Mech 898

  15. Hult E, Troy C, Koseff J (2011) The mixing efficiency of interfacial waves breaking at a ridge: 2. local mixing processes. J Geophys Res Oceans 116(C2)

  16. Ijichi T, Hibiya T (2018) Observed variations in turbulent mixing efficiency in the deep ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 48(8):1815–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Itsweire E, Koseff J, Briggs D et al (1993) Turbulence in stratified shear flows: implications for interpreting shear-induced mixing in the ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 23(7):1508–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ivey GN, Imberger J (1991) On the nature of turbulence in a stratified fluid. Part I: the energetics of mixing. J Phys Oceanogr 21(5):650–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jalali M, Sarkar S (2014) Turbulence and dissipation in a computational model of luzon strait. In: APS division of fluid dynamics meeting abstracts, pp E23–005

  20. Jalali M, Sarkar S, Chalamalla VK (2016) Local turbulence and baroclinic energy balance in a Luzon strait model. Am Geophys Union 2016:PO34C-3072

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lewin S, Caulfield C (2021) The influence of far field stratification on shear-induced turbulent mixing. J Fluid Mech 928

  22. Lindborg E, Brethouwer G (2008) Vertical dispersion by stratified turbulence. J Fluid Mech 614:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lozovatsky I, Fernando H (2013) Mixing efficiency in natural flows. Philos Trans Roy Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 371(1982):20120213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maffioli A, Davidson PA (2016) Dynamics of stratified turbulence decaying from a high buoyancy Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 786:210–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maffioli A, Brethouwer G, Lindborg E (2016) Mixing efficiency in stratified turbulence. J Fluid Mech 794:R3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mashayek A, Caulfield C, Peltier W (2013) Time-dependent, non-monotonic mixing in stratified turbulent shear flows: implications for oceanographic estimates of buoyancy flux. J Fluid Mech 736:570–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mashayek A, Salehipour H, Bouffard D et al (2017) Efficiency of turbulent mixing in the abyssal ocean circulation. Geophys Res Lett 44(12):6296–6306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mashayek A, Caulfield C, Alford M (2021) Goldilocks mixing in oceanic shear-induced turbulent overturns. J Fluid Mech 928

  29. Mater BD, Venayagamoorthy SK (2014) The quest for an unambiguous parameterization of mixing efficiency in stably stratified geophysical flows. Geophys Res Lett 41(13):4646–4653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mater BD, Schaad SM, Venayagamoorthy SK (2013) Relevance of the thorpe length scale in stably stratified turbulence. Phys Fluids 25(7):076604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Monismith SG, Koseff JR, White BL (2018) Mixing efficiency in the presence of stratification: When is it constant? Geophys Res Lett 45(11):5627–5634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mukherjee P, Balasubramanian S (2021) Diapycnal mixing efficiency in lock-exchange gravity currents. Phys Rev Fluids 6(1):013801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Munk W, Wunsch C (1998) Abyssal recipes II: energetics of tidal and wind mixing. Deep Sea Res Part I 45(12):1977–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Osborn TR (1980) Estimates of the local rate of vertical diffusion from dissipation measurements. J Phys Oceanogr 10(1):83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Osborn TR, Lueck RG (1985) Turbulence measurements with a submarine. J Phys Oceanogr 15(11):1502–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ozmidov RV (1965) On the turbulent exchange in a stably stratified ocean. izv. acad. sci. ussr. Atmos Ocean Phys 1:861–871

    Google Scholar 

  37. Peltier WR, Caulfield CP (2003) Mixing efficiency in stratified shear flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:135–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Salehipour H, Peltier WR (2015) Diapycnal diffusivity, turbulent Prandtl number and mixing efficiency in Boussinesq stratified turbulence. J Fluid Mech 775:464–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shih LH, Koseff JR, Ferziger JH et al (2000) Scaling and parameterization of stratified homogeneous turbulent shear flow. J Fluid Mech 412:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shih LH, Koseff JR, Ivey GN et al (2005) Parameterization of turbulent fluxes and scales using homogeneous sheared stably stratified turbulence simulations. J Fluid Mech 525:193–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Smyth WD, Moum JN (2000) Anisotropy of turbulence in stably stratified mixing layers. Phys Fluids 12(6):1343–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Thorpe SA (1977) Turbulence and mixing in a Scottish loch. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 286(1334):125–181

    Google Scholar 

  43. Thorpe SA (2005) The turbulent ocean. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Venayagamoorthy SK, Koseff JR (2016) On the flux Richardson number in stably stratified turbulence. J Fluid Mech 798

  45. Venayagamoorthy SK, Stretch DD (2010) On the turbulent Prandtl number in homogeneous stably stratified turbulence. J Fluid Mech 644:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wesson J, Gregg M (1994) Mixing at Camarinal sill in the strait of Gibraltar. J Geophys Res Oceans 99(C5):9847–9878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Winters KB, Lombard PN, Riley JJ et al (1995) Available potential energy and mixing in density-stratified fluids. J Fluid Mech 289:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank and acknowledge Dr. Andrea Maffioli and Dr. Lucinda Shih for providing their DNS data. SKV and MRK gratefully acknowledge funding from the Office of Naval Research (N00014- 18-1-2773 and N00014-22-1-2043) and the National Science Foundation under Grant No. OCE-2149047.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors have contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhas Karan Venayagamoorthy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klema, M.R., Venayagamoorthy, S.K. Mixing rates in stably stratified flows with respect to the turbulent froude number and turbulent scales. Environ Fluid Mech 23, 1037–1049 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-023-09925-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-023-09925-1

Keywords

Navigation