Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The geography of near-shelf mixing on the east coast of South Africa

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct observations of turbulent mixing in energetic ocean currents are fundamentally important to improving the understanding of stratified turbulence and the predictive capability of ocean models. In this study, we have selected an energetic region of the Western Indian Ocean to make simultaneous measurements of temperature and velocity to directly infer the geography of turbulent mixing on the east coast of South Africa. Direct measurements of the rate of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation, \(\epsilon\), were recorded by an autonomous underwater vehicle glider platform and vertical microstructure profiler (VMP). The glider was deployed in the Agulhas current in 2015 over a 200 km transect and measured approximately 250 vertical profiles of turbulent microstructure. Additional vertical profiles near the shelf were obtained from approximately 85 VMP casts during 2018 in a region where the powerful Agulhas current is formed and interacts with the shelf. VMP and glider data collected at Sodwana Bay and the Agulhas current showed evidence of elevated dissipation rates \(10^{-8}<\epsilon <10^{-6}\) Wkg\(^{-1}\). Our results indicate that in general turbulent mixing in the Agulhas is concentrated spatially in pancake-shaped patches. Ordinary Kriging was used to interpolate between consecutive profiles and showed that the horizontal scale of the turbulent patches was typically O(1 km) while the vertical scales of the patches ranged between 0.01 and 10 m.

Article Highlights

  • Direct measurements of turbulent dissipation in the strong persistent Agulhas current are presented for the first time using sensors fitted on a glider and vertical microstructure profiler.

  • Ordinary Kriging revealed the geography of mixing and that turbulent mixing in the Agulhas is concentrated spatially in pancake-shaped patches.

  • VMP data collected at Sodwana showed evidence of elevated dissipation rates \(10^{-8}<\epsilon <10^{-6}\) Wkg\(^{-1}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arthur RS, Venayagamoorthy SK, Koseff JR, Fringer OB (2017) How we compute N matters to estimates of mixing in stratified flows. J Fluid Mech. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker MA, Gibson CH (1987) Sampling turbulence in the stratified ocean: statistical consequences of strong intermittency. J Phys Oceanogr 17:1817–1836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beal LM, Chereskin TK, Lenn YD, Elipot S (2006) The sources and mixing characteristics of the Agulhas current. J Phys Oceanogr 36(11):2060–2074. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beal LM, De Ruijter WP, Biastoch A, Zahn R, Cronin M, Hermes J, Lutjeharms J, Quartly G, Tozuka T, Baker-Yeboah S, Bornman T, Cipollini P, Dijkstra H, Hall I, Park W, Peeters F, Penven P, Ridderinkhof H, Zinke J (2011) On the role of the Agulhas system in ocean circulation and climate. Nature 472(7344):429–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bluteau CE, Jones NL, Ivey GN (2016) Estimating turbulent dissipation from microstructure shear measurements using maximum likelihood spectral fitting over the inertial and viscous subranges. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 33(4):713–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bluteau CE, Lueck RG, Ivey GN, Jones NL, Book JW, Rice AE (2017) Determining mixing rates from concurrent temperature and velocity measurements. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 34(10):2283–2293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cael BB, Mashayek A (2021) Log-skew-normality of ocean turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 126(22):224502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.224502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dauxois T, Peacock T, Bauer P, Caulfield CP, Cenedese C, Gorlé C, Haller G, Ivey GN, Linden PF, Meiburg E, Pinardi N, Vriend NM, Woods A (2020) Confronting grand challenges in environmental fluid mechanics. Phys Rev Fluids 6(2):020501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Silva IP, Fernando HJ (1998) Experiments on collapsing turbulent regions in stratified fluids. J Fluid Mech 358:29–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112097008094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dewitt RJ, Henyey FS, Wright JA (1990) The geometry of turbulent patches from a numerical simulation of internal wave critical layer events. J Geophys Res 95(C6):9731. https://doi.org/10.1029/jc095ic06p09731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dillon TM (1982) Vertical overturns: a comparison of Thorpe and Ozmidov length scales. J Geophys Res 87(C12):9601. https://doi.org/10.1029/jc087ic12p09601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellison TH (1957) Turbulent transport of heat and momentum from an infinite rough plane. J Fluid Mech 2(5):456–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112057000269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fer I, Peterson AK, Ullgren JE (2014) Microstructure measurements from an underwater glider in the turbulent Faroe Bank Channel overflow. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 31(5):1128–1150. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00221.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson CH (1980) Fossil temperature, salinity, and vorticity turbulence in the ocean. In: Elsevier oceanography series. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 221–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0422-9894(08)71223-6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodman L, Levine ER, Lueck RG (2006) On measuring the terms of the turbulent kinetic energy budget from an AUV. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 23(7):977–990. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1889.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregg MC (1987) Diapycnal mixing in the thermocline: a review. J Geophys Res Oceans 92(C5):5249–5286. https://doi.org/10.1029/JC092iC05p05249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gründlingh ML (1988) Review of cyclonic eddies of the Moçambique Ridge Current. S Afr J Mar Sci 6(1):193–206. https://doi.org/10.2989/025776188784480717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hinze O (1959) Turbulence. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Isaaks EH (1990) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-0304

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Itsweire EC (1984) Measurements of vertical overturns in a stably stratified turbulent flow. Phys Fluids 27(4):764–766. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.864704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Itsweire EC, Koseff JR, Briggs D, Ferziger J (1993) Turbulence in stratified shear flows: implications for interpreting shear-induced mixing in the ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 23:1508–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ivey GN, Winters KB, Koseff JR (2008) Density stratification, turbulence, but how much mixing? Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40(1):169–184. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.39.050905.110314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krug M, Swart S, Gula J (2017) Submesoscale cyclones in the Agulhas current. Geophys Res Lett 44(1):346–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lueck R (2013) RSI Technical Note 028: calculating the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy. Rockland Scientific International Inc, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lueck RG, Wolk F, Yamazaki H (2001) Oceanic velocity microstructure measurements in the 20th century. J Oceanogr 58:153–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lutjeharms JR, Bornman TG (2010) The importance of the greater Agulhas current is increasingly being recognized. S Afr J Sci 106(3–4):1–4. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v106i3/4.160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lutjeharms JRE (2006) The coastal oceans of south-eastern Africa. In: Robinson AR, Brink KH (eds) The Sea, vol. 14B, The Global Coastal Ocean. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  28. Macoun P, Lueck R (2004) Modeling the spatial response of the airfoil shear probe using different sized probes. J Atmos Ocean Technol 21(2):284–297. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0284:MTSROT>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Masunaga E, Fringer OB, Yamazaki H, Amakasu K (2016) Strong turbulent mixing induced by internal bores interacting with internal tide-driven vertically sheared flow. Geophys Res Lett 43(5):2094–2101. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mater BD, Schaad SM, Venayagamoorthy SK (2013) Relevance of the Thorpe length scale in stably stratified turbulence. Phys Fluids 10(1063/1):4813809

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mater BD, Venayagamoorthy SK, Laurent LS (2015) Biases in Thorpe-scale estimates of turbulence dissipation. Part I: assessments from large-scale overturns in oceanographic data. J Phys Oceanogr 45(10):2497–2521. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0128.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Merrifield ST, Laurent LS, Owens B, Thurnherr AM, Toole JM (2016) Enhanced diapycnal diffusivity in intrusive regions of the Drake passage. J Phys Oceanogr 46(4):1309–1321. https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-15-0068.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moum JN (1996) Efficiency of mixing in the main thermocline. J Geophys Res 101(C5):57–69

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moum JN (1996) Energy-containing scales of turbulence in the ocean thermocline. J Geophys Res C: Oceans 101(C6):14095–14109. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jc00507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moum JN, Gregg MC, Lien R, Carr M (1995) Comparison of turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rate estimates from two ocean microstructure profilers. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 12:346–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nasmyth PW (1970) Oceanic Turbulence. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia

  37. Osborn TR (1980) Estimates of the local rate of vertical diffusion from dissipation measurements. J Phys Oceanogr 10(1):83–89. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1980)010<0083:eotlro>2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Osborn TR, Cox CS (1972) Oceanic fine structure. Geophys Fluid Dyn 3(4):321–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091927208236085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ozmidov R (1965) On the turbulent exchange in a stably stratified ocean. Izv Acad Sci USSR. Atmos Oceanic Phys 1(8):853–860

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pearson H, Linden PF (1983) The final stage of decay of turbulence in stably stratified fluid. J Fluid Mech 134:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112083003304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Penven P, Lutjeharms JR, Florenchie P (2006) Madagascar: a pacemaker for the Agulhas Current system? Geophys Res Lett 33(17):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J (2009) Applied geostatistics with SGeMS. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139150019

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. Riley JJ, Lelong MP (2000) Fluid motions in the presence of strong stable stratification. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:613–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Riley JJ, Lindborg E (2008) Stratified turbulence: a possible interpretation of some geophysical turbulence measurements. J Atmos Sci 65(7):2416–2424. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2455.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Roberts MJ, Ribbink AJ, Morris T, den Berg MA, Engelbrecht DC, Harding RT (2006) Oceanographic environment of the Sodwana Bay coelacanths (Latimeria chalumnae), South Africa : coelacanth research. S Afr J Sci 102(9–10):435–443 (https://journals.co.za/content/sajsci/102/9-10/EJC96601)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Roberts MJ, Ternon JF, Morris T (2014) Interaction of dipole eddies with the western continental slope of the Mozambique Channel. Deep Sea Res Part II 100:54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ruddick B, Anis A, Thompson K (2000) Maximum likelihood spectral fitting: the batchelor spectrum. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 17(11):1541–1555. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1541:MLSFTB>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rudnick DL (2016) Ocean research enabled by underwater gliders. Ann Rev Mar Sci 8:519–541. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-033913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Schofield J, Kohut J, Aragon D, Creed L, Graver J, Haldeman C, Kerfoot J, Roarty H, Jones C, Webb D, Glenn S (2007) Slocum gliders: robust and ready. J Field Robot 24(6):473–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Shih LH, Koseff JR, Ivey GN, Ferziger JH (2005) Parameterization of turbulent fluxes and scales using homogeneous sheared stably stratified turbulence simulations. J Fluid Mech 525:193–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112004002587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Smyth WD, Thorpe SA (2012) Glider measurements of overturning in a Kelvin–Helmholtz billow train. J Mar Res 70(1):119–140. https://doi.org/10.1357/002224012800502381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. St Laurent L, Merrifield S (2017) Measurements of near-surface turbulence and mixing from autonomous ocean gliders. Oceanography 30(2):116–125. https://doi.org/10.5670/OCEANOG.2017.231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Stretch DD, Venayagamoorthy SK (2010) Diapycnal diffusivities in homogeneous stratified turbulence. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Thorpe SA (1977) Turbulence and mixing in a Scottish Loch. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 286(1334):125–181. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1977.0112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Thorpe SA (2012) Measuring overturns with gliders. J Mar Res 70(1):93–117. https://doi.org/10.1357/002224012800502417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Venayagamoorthy SK, Fringer OB (2006) Numerical simulations of the interaction of internal waves with a shelf break. Phys Fluids 18(7):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2221863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Waterhouse AF, MacKinnon JA, Nash JD, Alford MH, Kunze E, Simmons HL, Polzin KL, St Laurent LC, Sun OM, Pinkel R, Talley LD (2014) Global patterns of diapycnal mixing from measurements of the turbulent dissipation rate. J Phys Oceanogr 44(7):1854–1872. https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-13-0104.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wells C, Pringle J, Stretch D (2021) Cold water temperature anomalies on the Sodwana reefs and their driving mechanisms. S Afr J Sci. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/9304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Whalen CB, Talley LD, MacKinnon JA (2012) Spatial and temporal variability of global ocean mixing inferred from Argo profiles. Geophys Res Lett 39(17):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wolk F, Lueck RG, St Laurent L (2009) Turbulence measurements from a glider. MTS/IEEE Biloxi—marine technology for our future: global and local challenges. OCEANS. IEEE, Biloxi, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wunsch C, Ferrari R (2004) Vertical mixing, energy, and the general circulation of the oceans. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36(1):281–314. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yamazaki H, Lueck RG, Osborn TR (1990) A comparison of turbulence data from a submarine and vertical profiler. J Phys Oceanogr 20:1778–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Other: DDS thanks the iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority for facilitating this research as part of our multi-disciplinary project entitled “Biodiversity & Hydrodynamics of the the iSimangaliso Wetland Park & adjacent Marine Environment” We further scknowledge the following for their assistance with field work: (1) The Slocum glider was supplied/supported by WHOI with on site support from Lou St Laurent, Sean Patrick Whelan & Karan Venayagamoorthy; (2) VMP 250 supplied by Rockland Scientific with on site support from Rolf Lueck & Evan Cervelli; (3) Other UKZN helpers include Dr Stef Corbella, Dr Robynne Chrystal, Calvin Wells, Bright Chifamba, Atish Deoraj, Chris Muledy, Dr M. Kumarasamy; (4) Boat operations provided by SeaXplore Dive Centre—Petro and Christo van Jaarsveld.

Funding

DDS acknowledges funding for this collaborative research project from ONR GLOBAL, NICOP Research Grant N62909-14-1-N249: He thanks ONR project managers Terri Paluszkiewicz and Augustus Vogel for their support. Collaborators on the project were Prof Karan Venayagamoorthy (Colorado State Univ), and Dr Louis St Laurent (WHOI). DDS also thanks eThekwini Municipality for supporting a sponsored Chair at UKZN which provided PG student funding. JJP is supported by the National Research Foundation UID: 127361.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Pringle.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pringle, J., Stretch, D. & Tirok, K. The geography of near-shelf mixing on the east coast of South Africa. Environ Fluid Mech 23, 1145–1165 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09866-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09866-1

Keywords

Navigation