Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of the fecal coliform plumes induced by river discharge and wind stress using a three-dimensional model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A three-dimensional hydrodynamic, suspended sediment, and fecal coliform transport model was developed and applied to characterize the fecal coliform plume in the Danshuei River estuarine system and its adjacent coastal sea. The numerical model was calibrated and validated with time-series water levels and spatial distributions of suspended sediment and fecal coliform concentrations in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Three indices (i.e., mean absolute error, root-mean-square error, and skill score) were used to compare the predicted results and measured data for assessing the performance of the model. Quantitatively, there was good agreement between the simulation and the measurement results. The validated model was later applied to explore the influence of river discharge and wind stress on the fecal coliform plume in the Danshuei River coastal area. In the absence of wind stress, no cyclonic circulation occurs as a result of river discharge under flood conditions. However, anticyclone circulation occurs on the east coast of the Danshuei River mouth at low river discharge. The plume distances of fecal coliform from the Danshuei River mouth reach 17 km and 5 km under flood flow and Q50 flow conditions, respectively. In the absence of river discharge, the plume distance of fecal coliform is confined to the Danshuei River mouth. Consequently, the wind directions control the upwelling and downwelling plumes. If the river discharge and wind stress are included in the model simulations, the surface fecal coliform concentrations are flushed out of the Danshuei River mouth and move to the southwestern coast as a result of the wind’s favoring downwelling. Conversely, the fecal coliform concentrations are flushed out of the Danshuei River mouth and flow to the northeastern coast, with the wind favoring upwelling. Comparing simulated results with and without wind stresses, the plume distance/area of fecal coliform decreases with the inclusion of wind stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abu-Bakar A, Ahmadian R, Falconer RA (2017) Modelling the transport and decay processes of microbial tracers in a macro-tidal estuary. Water Res 123:802–824

    Google Scholar 

  2. Androulidakis YS, Kourafalou VH, Schiller RV (2015) Process studies on the evolution of the Mississippi River plume: impact of topography, wind and discharge conditions. Cont Shelf Res 107:33–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ariathuri R, Krone RB (1976) Finite element model for cohesive sediment transport. J Hydraul Eng 102(3):323–338

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bai S, Lung WS (2005) Modeling sediment impact on the transport of fecal bacteria. Water Res 39(20):5232–5240

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bedri Z, Bruen M, Dowley A, Masterson B (2011) A three-dimensional hydro-environmental model of Dublin Bay. Environ Model Assess 16(4):369–384

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown MM, Mulligan RP, Miller RL (2014) Modeling the transport of freshwater and dissolved organic carbon in the Neuse River Estuary, NC, USA following Hurricane Irene (2011). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 139:148–158

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chan SN, Thoe W, Lee JHW (2013) Real-time forecasting of Hong Kong beach water quality by 3D deterministic model. Water Res 47(4):1631–1647

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chao SY (1988) Wind-driven motion of estuarine plumes. J Phys Oceanogr 18(8):1144–1166

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chao SY (1990) Tidal modulation by estuarine plumes. J Phys Oceanogr 20(7):1115–1123

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen W, Chen K, Kuang C, Zhu DZ, He L, Mao X, Liang H, Song H (2016) Influence of sea level rise on saline water intrusion in the Yangtz River Estuary. Appl Ocean Res 54:12–25

    Google Scholar 

  11. Connolly JP, Blumberg AF, Quadrini JD (1999) Modeling fate of pathogenic organisms in coastal waters of Oahu, Hawaii. J Environ Eng 125(5):398–406

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davies JL (1964) A morphogenic approach to world shorelines. Zeitschrift Fur Geomorphologi 8:27–42

    Google Scholar 

  13. de Brauwere A, Gourgue O, de Brye B, Servais P, Ouattara NK, Deleersnijder E (2014) Integrated modelling of faecal contamination in a densely populated river-sea continuum (Scheldt River and Esatury). Sci Total Environ 468–469:31–45

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Brauwere A, de Brye B, Servais P, Passerat J, Deleersnijder E (2011) Modelling Escherichia coli concentrations in the tidal Scheldt river and estuary. Water Res 45(9):2724–2738

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dyer KR (1997) Estuaries: a physical introduction, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Einstein HA, Krone RB (1962) Experiments to determine models of cohesive sediment transport in salt water. J Geophys Res 67:1451–1461

    Google Scholar 

  17. Falcieri FM, Benetazzo A, Sclavo M, Russo A, Carniel S (2014) Po River plume variability investigated from model data. Cont Shelf Res 87:84–95

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gao G, Falconer RA, Lin B (2011) Numerical modelling of sediment-bacteria interaction processes in surface waters. Water Res 45(5):1951–1960

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gao G, Falconer RA, Lin B (2015) Modelling the fate and transport of faecal bacteria in estuarine and coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 100(1):162–168

    Google Scholar 

  20. Garcia-Armisen T, Thouvenin B, Servais P (2006) Modelling faecal coliforms dynamics in the Seine estuary, France. Water Sci Technol 54(3):177–184

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gong W, Shen J (2010) A model diagnostic study of age of river-borne sediment transport in the tidal York River. Environ Fluid Mech 10(1–2):177–196

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gourgue O, Baeyens W, Chen MS, de Brauwerem A, de Brye B, Deleersnijder E, Elskens M, Legat C (2013) A depth-averaged two-dimensional sediment transport model for environmental studies in the Scheldt Estuary and tidal river network. J Mar Syst 128:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hipsey MR, Antenucci JP, Brookes JD (2008) A generic, process-based model of microbial pollution in aquatic systems. Water Resour Res 44(W07408):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hsu MH, Kuo AY, Kuo JT, Liu WC (1999) Procedure to calibrate and verify numerical models of estuarine hydrodynamics. J Hydraul Eng 125(2):166–182

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huang G, Falconer RA, Lin B (2015) Integrated river and costal flow, sediment and Escherichia coli modelling for bathing water quality. Water 7(9):4742–4777

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kashefipour SM, Lin B, Harris E, Falconer RA (2002) Hydro-environmental modelling for bathing water compliance of an estuarine basin. Water Res 36(7):1854–1868

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li Y, Martins F, Wolanski E (2017) Sensitivity analysis of the physical dynamics of the Fly River plume in Torres Strait. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 194:84–91

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liste M, Grifoll M, Monbaliu J (2014) River plume dispersion in response to flash flood events. Application to the Catalan shelf. Cont Shelf Res 87:96–108

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu L, Phanikumar MS, Molloy SL, Whitman RL, Shively DA, Nevers MB, Schwab DJ, Rose JB (2006) Modeling the transport and inactivation of E. coli and Enterococci in the near-shore region of Lake Michigan. Environ Sci Technol 40(16):5022–5028

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liu WC, Hsu MH, Kuo AY (2002) Modeling of hydrodynamics and cohesive sediment transport in Tanshui River estuarine system. Mar Pollut Bull 44(10):1076–1088

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liu WC, Huang WC (2012) Modeling the transport and distribution of fecal coliform in a tidal estuary. Sci Total Environ 431:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  32. Manache G, Melching CS, Lanyon R (2007) Calibration of a continuous simulation fecal coliform model based on historical data analysis. J Environ Eng 133(7):681–691

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marques WC, Fernandes EH, Monteiro IO, Moller OO (2009) Numerical modeling of the Patos Lagoon coastal plume, Brazil. Cont Shelf Res 29(3):556–571

    Google Scholar 

  34. McCorquodale JA, Georglou I, Carnelos S, Englande AJ (2004) Modelling coliforms in storm water plumes. J Environ Eng Sci 3(5):419–431

    Google Scholar 

  35. Montgomery Waston Harza (MWH) (2011) Evaluation of hydrodynamics and water quality monitoring and management in the Danshuei River basin of New Taipei City. Final Report to the New Taipei City Government

  36. Oliveira A, Rodrigues M, Fortunato AB, Guerreiro M (2011) Impact of seasonal bathymetric changes and inlet morphology on the 3D water renewal and residence times of a small coastal stream. J Coast Res 64:1555–1559

    Google Scholar 

  37. Osadchiev AA, Zavialov PO (2013) Lagrangian model of a surface-advected river plume. Cont Shelf Res 58:96–106

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ouattara NK, de Brauwere A, Billen G, Servais P (2013) Modelling fecal contaminant in the Scheldt drainage network. J Mar Syst 128:77–88

    Google Scholar 

  39. Partheniades E (1965) Erosion and deposition of cohesive soils. J Hydraul Div ASCE 91(1):105–139

    Google Scholar 

  40. Perianez R (2005) Modelling the transport of suspended particulate matter by the Rhone River plume (France). Implications for pollutant dispersion. Environ Pollut 133(2):351–364

    Google Scholar 

  41. Perianez R (2005) Modelling the dispersion of radionuclides by a river plume: application to the Rhone river. Cont Shelf Res 25(12–13):1583–1603

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rippy MA, Stein R, Sanders BF, Davis K, McLaughlin K, Skinner JF, Kappeler J, Grant SB (2014) Small drains, big problems: the impact of dry weather runoff on shoreline water quality at enclosed beaches. Environ Sci Technol 48(24):14168–14177

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rodrigues M, Guerreiro M, David LM, Oliveira A, Menaia J, Jacob J (2016) Role of environmental forcings in fecal contamination behavior in a small intermittent coastal stream: case study of the Aljezur coastal stream, Portugal. J Environ Eng 142(5):05016001

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rodrigues M, Oliveira A, Guerreiro M, Fortunato AB, Menaia J, David LM, Cravo A (2011) Modeling fecal contamination in the Aljezur coastal stream (Portugal). Ocean Dyn 61:841–856

    Google Scholar 

  45. Romeiro NML, Castro RGS, Cirilo ER, Nattu PL (2011) Local calibration of coliform parameters of water quality problem at IgapoI Lake, Londrina, Brazil. Ecol Model 222:1888–1896

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rong Z, Li M (2012) Tidal effects on bulge region of Changjiang River plume. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 97:149–160

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schnauder I, Bockelmann-Evans B, Lin B (2007) Modelling faecal bacteria pathways in receiving waters. Proc Inst Civ Eng Marit Eng 160(4):143–153

    Google Scholar 

  48. Soares ID, Kourafalou V, Lee TN (2007) Circulation on the western South Atlantic continental shelf. Part 2: spring and autumn realistic simulations. J Geophys Res 112:C04003

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sokolova E, Pettersson TJR, Bergstedt O, Hermansson M (2013) Hydrodynamic modelling of the microbial water quality in a drinking water sources as input for risk reduction management. J Hydrol 497:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sousa MC, Vaz N, Alvarez I, Gomez-Gesteira M, Dias JM (2014) Modeling the Minho River plume intrusion into the Rias Baixas (NW Iberian Peninsula). Cont Shelf Res 85:30–41

    Google Scholar 

  51. Su SF (2006) Variation of tidal current vertical structure at Tanshui Estuary region of freshwater influence. Mater Thesis, National Sun Yat-Sen University, 2006 (in Chinese)

  52. Thomann RV, Mueller JA (1987) Principles of surface water quality and control. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tiburg CE, Houghton RW, Garvine RW (2007) Mixing of a dye tracer in the Delaware plume: comparison of observations and simulations. J Geophys Res 112:C12004

    Google Scholar 

  54. Van CP, Gourgue O, Sassi M, HoitinkTon AJF, Dellersnijder E, Soares-Frazao S (2016) Modelling fine-grained sediment transport in the Mahakam land-sea continuum Indonesia. J Hydro-environ Res 13:103–120

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang D, Cao A, Zhang J, Fan D, Liu Y, Zhang Y (2017) A three-dimensional cohesive sediment transport model with data assimilation: model development, sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 206:87–100

    Google Scholar 

  56. Winterwerp JC (2013) The physical analysis of muddy sedimentation processes. Treat Estuar Coast Sci 2:311–360

    Google Scholar 

  57. Xie M, Xie L, Pietrafesa LJ (2007) Modeling the cape fear river estuary plume. Estuar Coast 30(4):698–709

    Google Scholar 

  58. Xie M, Xie L, Pietrafesa LJ, Whitney MW (2011) The ideal responses of a Gulf of Mexico estuary plume to wind forcing: its connection with salt flux and a Lagrangian review. J Geophys Res 116(C8):C08035

    Google Scholar 

  59. Yao HY, Leonardi N, Li JF, Fagherazzi S (2016) Sediment transport in a surface-advected estuarine plume. Cont Shelf Res 116:122–135

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yu X, Guo X, Morimoto A, Buranapratheprat A (2018) Simulation of river plume behaviors in a tropical region: case study of the Upper Gulf of Thailand. Cont Shelf Res 153:16–29

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang YL, Baptista AM (2008) SELFE: a semi-implicit Eulerian–Lagrangian finite-element model for cross-scale ocean circulation. Ocean Model 21(3–4):71–96

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang YL, Baptista AM (2008) An efficient and robust tsunami model on unstructured grids. Part I: Inundation benchmarks. Pure Appl Geophys 165(11–12):2229–2248

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang YL, Baptista AM, Myers EP (2004) A cross-scale model for 3D baroclinic circulation in estuary-plume-shelf systems: I. Formulation and skill assessment. Cont Shelf Res 24(18):2187–2214

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zheng S, Guan W, Cai S, Wei X, Huang D (2014) A model study of the effects of river discharges and interannual variation of winds on the plume front on winter in Pear River Estuary. Cont Shelf Res 73:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhu X, Wang JD, Solo-Garbriele HM, Fleming LE (2011) A water quality modeling study of non-point sources at recreational marine beaches. Water Res 45(9):2985–2995

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project under which this study was conducted was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan under Grant Number 104-2625-M-239-002. The authors would like to express their appreciation to the Taiwan Water Resources Agency and the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration for providing the measured data. The authors also thank Dr. Wei-Bo Chen of the National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction (NCDR), for providing the suspended sediment and fecal coliform transport model. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their constructive comments to substantially improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Disaster Prevention Engineering, National United University, Miaoli, 36063, Taiwan, ROC

    Wen-Cheng Liu & Hong-Ming Liu

Authors
  1. Wen-Cheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hong-Ming Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Cheng Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, WC., Liu, HM. Investigation of the fecal coliform plumes induced by river discharge and wind stress using a three-dimensional model. Environ Fluid Mech 20, 19–49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-019-09688-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-019-09688-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation