Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental observations of 3D flow alterations by vegetation under oscillatory flows

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents observations from a series of experiments on an oscillatory tunnel, using a three-dimensional, volumetric particle image velocimetry system to investigate the effect of a single plant morphology on flow alterations. Three synthetic plants, mimicking three species representative of riverine, tidal, and coastal vegetation communities are investigated under various combinations of wave period and orbital excursion. The study allows to investigate the temporal and spatial distribution of the velocity field past the submerged plants with high spatial resolution. It shows that even a detailed characterization of plant morphology, represented by obstructed area or patch porosity, is not enough to accurately parameterize variations in instantaneous velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, bed shear stresses, and coherent flow structures. The study shows that bending and swaying of the plant generates eddies at multiple scales, at various locations and orientations with respect to the stem, branches, and leaves, which may be overlooked with point measurements or even 2D PIV, and can significantly enhance or dampen forces at the bed driving sediment transport processes in sparse vegetation patches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdolahpour M, Ghisalberti M, Lavery P, McMahon K (2017) Vertical mixing in coastal canopies. Limnol Oceanogr 62(1):26–42

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abdolahpour M, Ghisalberti M, McMahon K, Lavery PS (2018) The impact of flexibility on flow, turbulence, and vertical mixing in coastal canopies. Limnol Oceanogr 63(6):2777–2792

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abdolahpour M, Hambleton M, Ghisalberti M (2017) The wave-driven current in coastal canopies. J Geophys Res Oceans 122(5):3660–3674

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aberle J, Järvelä J (2015) Hydrodynamics of vegetated channels. In: Rowiński P, Radecki-Pawlik A (eds) Rivers–physical, fluvial and environmental processes. Cham, Switzerland, pp 519–541

    Google Scholar 

  5. Albayrak I, Nikora V, Miler O, O’Hare MT (2014) Flow-plant interactions at leaf, stem and shoot scales: drag, turbulence, and biomechanics. Aquat Sci 76(2):269–294

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson ME, Smith JM (2014) Wave attenuation by flexible, idealized salt marsh vegetation. Coast Eng 83:82–92

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boothroyd RJ, Hardy RJ, Warburton J, Marjoribanks TI (2016) The importance of accurately representing submerged vegetation morphology in the numerical prediction of complex river flow. Earth Surf Process Landf 41(4):567–576

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bornette G, Puijalon S (2011) Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review. Aquat Sci 73(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carstensen S, Sumer BM, Fredsøe J (2010) Coherent structures in wave boundary layers. Part 1. Oscillatory motion. J Fluid Mech 646:169–206

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chang K, Constantinescu G (2015) Numerical investigation of flow and turbulence structure through and around a circular array of rigid cylinders. J Fluid Mech 776:161–199

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flammang BE, Lauder GV, Troolin DR, Strand TE (2011) Volumetric imaging of fish locomotion. Biol Lett 7(5):695–698

    Google Scholar 

  12. García MH, López F, Dunn C, Alonso CV (2004) Flow, turbulence, and resistance in a flume with simulated vegetation. In: Bennett SJ, Simon A (eds) Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphology. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 11–27

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghisalberti M, Nepf HM (2002) Mixing layers and coherent structures in vegetated aquatic flows. J Geophys Res Oceans 107(C2):3-1–3-11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghisalberti M, Schlosser T (2013) Vortex generation in oscillatory canopy flow. J Geophys Res Oceans 118(3):1534–1542

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guilmineau E, Queutey P (2002) A numerical simulation of vortex shedding from an oscillating circular cylinder. J Fluids Struct 16(6):773–794

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen JC, Reidenbach MA (2012) Wave and tidally driven flows in eelgrass beds and their effect on sediment suspension. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 448:271–288

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen JC, Reidenbach MA (2017) Turbulent mixing and fluid transport within florida bay seagrass meadows. Adv Water Resour 108:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henriquez M, Reniers A, Ruessink B, Stive M (2012) Vortex tubes in the wave bottom boundary layer. In: Wouter Kranenburg EH, Wijnberg KM (eds) Proceedings of the 6th European conference on computer systems. University of Twente, Department of Water Engineering & Management, pp 143–146

  19. Henry PY, Myrhaug D, Aberle J (2015) Drag forces on aquatic plants in nonlinear random waves plus current. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 165:10–24

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heuner M, Silinski A, Schoelynck J, Bouma TJ, Puijalon S, Troch P, Fuchs E, Schröder B, Schröder U, Meire P et al (2015) Ecosystem engineering by plants on wave-exposed intertidal flats is governed by relationships between effect and response traits. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0138086

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hino M, Kashiwayanagi M, Nakayama A, Hara T (1983) Experiments on the turbulence statistics and the structure of a reciprocating oscillatory flow. J Fluid Mech 131:363–400

    Google Scholar 

  22. Horstman EM, Bryan KR, Mullarney JC, Pilditch CA, Eager CA (2018) Are flow-vegetation interactions well represented by mimics? A case study of mangrove pneumatophores. Adv Water Resour 111:360–371

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jensen B, Sumer B, Fredsøe J (1989) Turbulent oscillatory boundary layers at high reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech 206:265–297

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kilminster K, McMahon K, Waycott M, Kendrick GA, Scanes P, McKenzie L, O’Brien KR, Lyons M, Ferguson A, Maxwell P et al (2015) Unravelling complexity in seagrass systems for management: Australia as a microcosm. Sci Total Environ 534:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kuo J, Den Hartog C (2007) Seagrass morphology, anatomy, and ultrastructure. In: Larkum AWD, Orth RJ, Duarte CM (eds) Seagrasses: biology, ecologyand conservation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 51–87

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lauder GV, Flammang B, Alben S (2012) Passive robotic models of propulsion by the bodies and caudal fins of fish. Integr Comp Biol 52(5):576–587

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee SY, Primavera JH, Dahdouh-Guebas F, McKee K, Bosire JO, Cannicci S, Diele K, Fromard F, Koedam N, Marchand C et al (2014) Ecological role and services of tropical mangrove ecosystems: a reassessment. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23(7):726–743

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lehn AM, Colin SP, Costello JH, Leftwich MC, Tytell ED (2015) Volumetric flow around a swimming lamprey. In: APS meeting Abstracts

  29. Liénard J, Lynn K, Strigul N, Norris BK, Gatziolis D, Mullarney JC, Karin RB, Henderson SM (2016) Efficient three-dimensional reconstruction of aquatic vegetation geometry: estimating morphological parameters influencing hydrodynamic drag. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 178:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  30. Losada IJ, Maza M, Lara JL (2016) A new formulation for vegetation-induced damping under combined waves and currents. Coast Eng 107:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lowe RJ, Koseff JR, Monismith SG (2005) Oscillatory flow through submerged canopies: 1. Velocity structure. J Geophys Res Oceans 110(C10016):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  32. Luhar M, Nepf H (2016) Wave-induced dynamics of flexible blades. J Fluids Struct 61:20–41

    Google Scholar 

  33. Luhar M, Nepf HM (2011) Flow-induced reconfiguration of buoyant and flexible aquatic vegetation. Limnol Oceanogr 56(6):2003–2017

    Google Scholar 

  34. Luhar M, Rominger J, Nepf H (2008) Interaction between flow, transport and vegetation spatial structure. Environ Fluid Mech 8(5–6):423

    Google Scholar 

  35. Maxwell PS, Eklöf JS, van Katwijk MM, O’brien KR, de la Torre-Castro M, Boström C, Bouma TJ, Krause-Jensen D, Unsworth RK, van Tussenbroek BI et al (2017) The fundamental role of ecological feedback mechanisms for the adaptive management of seagrass ecosystems—a review. Biol Rev 92(3):1521–1538

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maza M, Lara JL, Losada IJ (2015) Tsunami wave interaction with mangrove forests: a 3-d numerical approach. Coast Eng 98:33–54

    Google Scholar 

  37. Maza M, Lara JL, Losada IJ (2016) Solitary wave attenuation by vegetation patches. Adv Water Resour 98:159–172

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mujal-Colilles A, Christensen KT, Bateman A, Garcia MH (2016) Coherent structures in oscillatory flows within the laminar-to-turbulent transition regime for smooth and rough walls. J Hydraul Res 54(5):502–515

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mujal-Colilles A, Mier JM, Christensen KT, Bateman A, Garcia MH (2014) Piv experiments in rough-wall, laminar-to-turbulent, oscillatory boundary-layer flows. Exp Fluids 55(1):1633

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mullarney JC, Henderson SM, Reyns JA, Norris BK, Bryan KR (2017) Spatially varying drag within a wave-exposed mangrove forest and on the adjacent tidal flat. Cont Shelf Res 147:102–113

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nepf H (1999) Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 35(2):479–489

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nepf HM (2012) Flow and transport in regions with aquatic vegetation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44:123–142

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nielsen P (1992) Coastal bottom boundary layers and sediment transport, vol 4. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  44. Norris BK, Mullarney JC, Bryan KR, Henderson SM (2017) The effect of pneumatophore density on turbulence: a field study in a sonneratia-dominated mangrove forest, vietnam. Cont Shelf Res 147:114–127

    Google Scholar 

  45. O’Hare MT, Aguiar FC, Asaeda T, Bakker ES, Chambers PA, Clayton JS, Elger A, Ferreira TM, Gross EM, Gunn ID et al (2017) Plants in aquatic ecosystems: current trends and future directions. Hydrobiologia 812(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ortiz AC, Ashton A, Nepf H (2013) Mean and turbulent velocity fields near rigid and flexible plants and the implications for deposition. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 118(4):2585–2599

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pan Y, Follett E, Chamecki M, Nepf H (2014) Strong and weak, unsteady reconfiguration and its impact on turbulence structure within plant canopies. Phys Fluids 26(10):2003–2017

    Google Scholar 

  48. Patterson MR, Harwell MC, Orth LM, Orth RJ (2001) Biomechanical properties of the reproductive shoots of eelgrass. Aquat Bot 69(1):27–40

    Google Scholar 

  49. Paul M, Henry PY, Thomas R (2014) Geometrical and mechanical properties of four species of northern european brown macroalgae. Coast Eng 84:73–80

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pothos S, Troolin D, Lai W, Menon R (2009) V3v-volumetric three-component velocimetry for 3d flow measurements main principle, theory and applications. Rev Termotec 2:2009

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pujol D, Casamitjana X, Serra T, Colomer J (2013) Canopy-scale turbulence under oscillatory flow. Cont Shelf Res 66:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pujol D, Serra T, Colomer J, Casamitjana X (2013) Flow structure in canopy models dominated by progressive waves. J Hydrol 486:281–292

    Google Scholar 

  54. Reidenbach MA, Monismith SG, Koseff JR, Yahel G, Genin A (2006) Boundary layer turbulence and flow structure over a fringing coral reef. Limnol Oceanogr 51(5):1956–1968

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ros À, Colomer J, Serra T, Pujol D, Soler M, Casamitjana X (2014) Experimental observations on sediment resuspension within submerged model canopies under oscillatory flow. Cont Shelf Res 91:220–231

    Google Scholar 

  56. Schnauder I, Moggridge HL (2009) Vegetation and hydraulic-morphological interactions at the individual plant, patch and channel scale. Aquat Sci 71(3):318

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sterk G, Jacobs A, Van Boxel J et al (1998) The effect of turbulent flow structures on saltation sand transport in the atmospheric boundary layer. Earth Surf Process Landf 23(10):877–887

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tanino Y, Nepf HM (2008) Lateral dispersion in random cylinder arrays at high reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 600:339–371

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tempest JA, Möller I, Spencer T (2015) A review of plant-flow interactions on salt marshes: the importance of vegetation structure and plant mechanical characteristics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 2(6):669–681

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tinoco R, Coco G (2014) Observations of the effect of emergent vegetation on sediment resuspension under unidirectional currents and waves. Earth Surf Dyn 2(1):83

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tinoco R, Coco G (2018) Turbulence as the main driver of resuspension in oscillatory flow through vegetation. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 123(5):891–904

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tinoco RO, Coco G (2016) A laboratory study on sediment resuspension within arrays of rigid cylinders. Adv Water Resour 92:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tinoco RO, Cowen EA (2013) The direct and indirect measurement of boundary stress and drag on individual and complex arrays of elements. Exp Fluids 54(4):1509

    Google Scholar 

  64. Vittori G, Verzicco R (1998) Direct simulation of transition in an oscillatory boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 371:207–232

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wang X, Xie W, Zhang D, He Q (2016) Wave and vegetation effects on flow and suspended sediment characteristics: a flume study. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 182:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wilson CJ, Wilson PS, Greene CA, Dunton KH (2010) Seagrass leaves in 3-d: using computed tomography and low-frequency acoustics to investigate the material properties of seagrass tissue. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 395(1–2):128–134

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wu WC, Cox DT (2015) Effects of wave steepness and relative water depth on wave attenuation by emergent vegetation. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 164:443–450

    Google Scholar 

  68. Yang JQ, Kerger F, Nepf HM (2015) Estimation of the bed shear stress in vegetated and bare channels with smooth beds. Water Resour Res 51(5):3647–3663

    Google Scholar 

  69. Yang W, Choi SU (2009) Impact of stem flexibility on mean flow and turbulence structure in depth-limited open channel flows with submerged vegetation. J Hydraul Res 47(4):445–454

    Google Scholar 

  70. Zeller RB, Weitzman JS, Abbett ME, Zarama FJ, Fringer OB, Koseff JR (2014) Improved parameterization of seagrass blade dynamics and wave attenuation based on numerical and laboratory experiments. Limnol Oceanogr 59(1):251–266

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zhang Y, Tang C, Nepf H (2018) Turbulent kinetic energy in submerged model canopies under oscillatory flow. Water Resour Res 54(3):1734–1750

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

JS was supported by UIUC-CEE Departmental Funds. GVC was supported by the SROP at UIUC. Data presented in this manuscript are available through Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7794011.v1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge E. San Juan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

San Juan, J.E., Veliz Carrillo, G. & Tinoco, R.O. Experimental observations of 3D flow alterations by vegetation under oscillatory flows. Environ Fluid Mech 19, 1497–1525 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-019-09672-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-019-09672-2

Keywords

Navigation