Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A wind tunnel and numerical study on the surface friction distribution on a flat roof with solar panels

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work aims to contribute for a better understanding of how solar panels, installed on a flat roof, affect the potential of aeolian erosion of loose particles deposited on it, influencing processes such as snow drifting. Two methodologies are employed, namely wind tunnel experiments and RANS simulation. Several configurations are studied, varying the distance between successive panels placed in tandem, and gap between the panels and the roof, for two wind orientations. The accuracy of the simulations is examined by comparing predicted results against wind tunnel experiments. It is confirmed that computational simulations, by means of k–ω SST turbulence model, yield the tendency of the static pressure, and also of wall shear stress, distributions along the roof provided that mesh satisfies y+ < 5. It is found that wall friction is considerably affected by the presence of panels and, consequently, the wind erosion process and, therefore, snow drifting on a roof. The computational wall shear stress results are confronted against experimental data, and, taking into account the uncertainty associated to the probes employed, it is found that, despite of high flow complexity, numerical simulations provide reliable information for this research field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NEN (2007). NEN 7250, solar energy systems—integration in roofs and facades—building aspects

  2. Blackmore P (2004) Wind loads on roof-based photovoltaic systems. BRE Digest 489:8

    Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 4355 (2013) Bases for design of structures—determination of snow loads on roofs

  4. European Committee for Standardization (2003) CEN, EN 1991-1-3, eurocode 1, actions on structures—part 1–3: general actions—snow loads

  5. Canadian roofing contractors’ association (2010) Technical bulletin, vol 57, p 4. https://roofingcanada.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Volume-57-Photovoltaics-in-Roofing-.pdf

  6. Ferreira AD (2011) Structural design of a natural windbreak using computational and experimental modeling. Environ Fluid Mech 11:517–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Viegas DX, Borges AR (1986) An erosion technique for the measurement of the shear stress field on a flat plate. J Phys E Sci Instrum 19:625–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bagnold RA (1941) The physics of blown sand and desert dunes. Methuen, London (reprinted 1954 1960, 2005. Dover, Mineola)

  9. Ferreira AD, Pinheiro SR, Francisco SC (2013) Experimental and numerical study on the shear velocity distribution along one or two dunes in tandem. Environ Fluid Mech 13:557–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faria R, Ferreira AD, Sismeiro JL, Mendes JCF, Sousa ACM (2011) Wind tunnel and computational study of the stoss slope effect on the aeolian erosion of transverse sand dunes. Aeolian Res 3:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Conan B, van Beeck J, Aubrun S (1981) Sand erosion technique applied to wind resource assessment. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 7:219–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thiis T, Ferreira AD, Molnar M, Erichsen AV (2015) Characterization of shear stress distribution on a flat roof with solar collectors. Tech Trans Civil Eng 12(2-B):359–368. https://doi.org/10.4467/2353737xct.15.143.4180

    Google Scholar 

  13. Irwin HPAH (2012) A simple omnidirectional sensor for wind-tunnel studies of pedestrian-level winds. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 104–106:322–329

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ferreira AD, Silva MCG, Viegas DX, Lopes AMG (1991) Wind tunnel simulation of the flow around two-dimensional hills. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 38:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Monteiro JP, Viegas DX (1996) On the use of Irwin and Preston wall shear stress probes in turbulent incompressible flows with pressure gradients. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 64(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Faria R, Ferreira AD, Lopes AMG, Sousa ACM (2017) On the calibration of Irwin probes for flow in rectangular ducts with different aspect ratios. J Fluids Eng 139(10):101401-1–101401-10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bradshaw P, Gregory M (1959) The determination of local turbulent skin friction from observations in the viscous sub-layer. Aeronaut Res Council Rept 20:895

    Google Scholar 

  18. Preston JH (1954) The determination of turbulent skin friction by means of Pitot tubes. J R Aeronaut Soc 58:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel VC (1965) Calibration of the Preston tube and limitations on its use in pressure gradients. J Fluid Mech 23:185–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bechert DR (1996) Calibration of Preston tubes. AIAA J 34(1):205–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. www.openfoam.org (2014)

  22. Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3:269–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32:1598–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Carmeliet J (2007) CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos Environ 41:238–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nikuradse J (1933) Laws of flow in rough pipes. Strömungsgesetze in rauhen Rohren (Translation). VDI-Forschungsheft 361. Beilage zu “Forschung auf dem Gebiete des Ingenieurwesens” Ausgabe B Band 4

  26. Schlichting H (1987) Boundary-layer theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lim HC, Thomas TG, Castro IP (2009) Flow around a cube in a turbulent boundary layer: LES and experiment. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 97:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yakhot A, Liu H, Nikitin N (2006) Turbulent flow around a wall-mounted cube: a direct numerical simulation. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 27:994–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferreira AD, Fino R, Thiis T, Lopes AMG, Sousa ACM (2018) On the modelling of wind erosion threshold of piles in tandem. In: Proc. Int. Symp. Computational Wind Enginnering 2018, Seoul, Republic of Korea, p 4

  30. Frei D, Thomann H (1980) Direct measurements of skin friction in a turbulent boundary layer with a strong adverse pressure gradient. J Fluid Mech 34:205–206

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fernholz H, Janke G, Schober M, Wagner PM, Warnack D (1996) New developments and applications of skin-friction measuring techniques. Meas Sci Technol 7:1396–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown KC, Joubert PN (1969) The measurements of skin friction in turbulent boundary layers with adverse pressure gradients. J Fluid Mech 35:737–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bertelrud A (1977) Total head/static measurements of skin friction and surface pressure. AIAA J 15(3):436–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lien SJ, Ahmed NA (2011) An examination of suitability of multi-hole pressure probe technique for skin friction measurement in turbulent flow. Flow Meas Instrum 22:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stout JE, Zobeck TM (1997) Intermittent saltation. Sedimentology 44:959–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Carneiro MV, Rasmussen KR, Herrmann HJ (2015) Bursts in discontinuous Aeolian saltation. Sci Rep 5:11109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou X, Zu G, Gu M, Hu J (2018) LES and wind tunnel test on friction velocity on roof surfaces. Cold Reg Sci Technol 151:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ADAI-LAETA, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Almerindo D. Ferreira, Nuno A. Freire & André M. C. Ferreira

  2. Department of Mathematical Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway

    Thomas Thiis

Authors
  1. Almerindo D. Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Thiis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nuno A. Freire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. André M. C. Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Almerindo D. Ferreira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, A.D., Thiis, T., Freire, N.A. et al. A wind tunnel and numerical study on the surface friction distribution on a flat roof with solar panels. Environ Fluid Mech 19, 601–617 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-018-9641-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-018-9641-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation