Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Physical modeling of the feedbacks between a patch of flexible Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), wake hydraulics, and downstream deposition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reed Canarygrass (RCG) is an aggressive invader in aquatic ecosystems that swiftly modifies the environment, resulting in biodiversity loss and reduced flood conveyance. However, because so little research has been conducted on RCG along riverbanks and islands, the mechanism by which it so rapidly colonizes rivers is not well understood. This study examined how colonization of RCG, via the expansion of an individual patch through wake deposition, may be driven by differences in flow depths. A set of mobile-bed experiments were conducted in a physical model to examine the influence of submergence depth on wake characteristics and deposition around a mid-channel, emergent patch of flexible RCG. At low submergence (31%) depths, low wake velocities promoted streamlined deposition behind the patch that is associated with longitudinal patch expansion. At deeper submergence (75%) depths, the introduction of vertical shear over a portion of deflected stems produced less overall deposition dispersed across the channel. Thus, it was found that, as submergence increased, positive feedbacks for longitudinal expansion of patches decreased. These results indicate that, from a management perspective, targeting removal of RCG patches at shallower submergence depths, and/or modifying the hydroperiod for deeper submergence of the plant, is likely to be more effective than targeting plants subjected to deeper flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ehrenfeld JG (2010) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:59–80. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouma TJ, van Duren LA, Temmerman S et al (2007) Spatial flow and sedimentation patterns within patches of epibenthic structures: combining field, flume and modelling experiments. Cont Shelf Res 27:1020–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Curran JC, Hession WC (2013) Vegetative impacts on hydraulics and sediment processes across the fluvial system. J Hydrol 505:364–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nepf HM (2012) Flow and transport in regions with aquatic vegetation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44:123–142. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsujimoto T (1999) Fluvial processes in streams with vegetation. J Hydraul Res 37:789–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689909498512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fei S, Phillips J, Shouse M (2014) Biogeomorphic impacts of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:69–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2004) Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) as a biological model in the study of plant invasions. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:415–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490505934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Apfelbaum SI, Sams CE et al (1987) Ecology and control of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). Nat Areas J 7:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coops H, Van Der Velde G (1995) Seed dispersal, germination and seedling growth of six helophyte species in relation to water-level zonation. Freshw Biol 34:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb00418.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kellogg CH, Bridgham SD, Leicht SA (2003) Effects of water level, shade and time on germination and growth of freshwater marsh plants along a simulated successional gradient. J Ecol 91:274–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barnes WJ (1999) The rapid growth of a population of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and its impact on some riverbottom herbs. J Torrey Bot Soc 126:133. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Washington State Department of Ecology. non-native invasive freshwater plants—reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea)—technical information. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/plants/weeds/aqua011.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2015

  13. Paveglio FL, Kilbride KM (2000) Response of vegetation to control of reed canarygrass in seasonally managed wetlands of Southwestern Washington. Wildl Soc Bull 28:730–740

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henry CP, Amoros C (1996) Are the banks a source of recolonization after disturbance: an experiment on aquatic vegetation in a former channel of the Rhone River. Hydrobiologia 330:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Corenblit D, Baas ACW, Bornette G et al (2011) Feedbacks between geomorphology and biota controlling Earth surface processes and landforms: a review of foundation concepts and current understandings. Earth Sci Rev 106:307–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Odling-Smee FJ, Feldman MW, Laland KN (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bonilla-Warford CM, Zedler JB (2002) Potential for using native plant species in stormwater wetlands. Environ Manag 29:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rice JS, Pinkerton BW (1993) Reed canarygrass survival under cyclic inundation. J Soil Water Conserv 48:132–135

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller RC, Zedler JB (2003) Responses of native and invasive wetland plants to hydroperiod and water depth. Plant Ecol 167:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Corenblit D, Tabacchi E, Steiger J, Gurnell AM (2007) Reciprocal interactions and adjustments between fluvial landforms and vegetation dynamics in river corridors: a review of complementary approaches. Earth Sci Rev 84:56–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Folkard AM (2011) Flow regimes in gaps within stands of flexible vegetation: laboratory flume simulations. Environ Fluid Mech 11:289–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-010-9197-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson CA, Hoyt J, Schnauder I (2008) Impact of foliage on the drag force of vegetation in aquatic flows. J Hydraul Eng 134:885–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nepf HM (1999) Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 35(2):479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nepf HM (2012) Hydrodynamics of vegetated channels. J Hydraul Res 50:262–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gurnell AM, Bertoldi W, Corenblit D (2012) Changing river channels: the roles of hydrological processes, plants and pioneer fluvial landforms in humid temperate, mixed load, gravel bed rivers. Earth Sci Rev 111:129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zong L, Nepf H (2011) Vortex development behind a finite porous obstruction in a channel. J Fluid Mech 691:368–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2011.479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Follett EM, Nepf HM (2012) Sediment patterns near a model patch of reedy emergent vegetation. Geomorphology 179:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ortiz AC, Ashton A, Nepf H (2013) Mean and turbulent velocity fields near rigid and flexible plants and the implications for deposition. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 118:2013002858. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen Z, Ortiz A, Zong L, Nepf H (2012) The wake structure behind a porous obstruction and its implications for deposition near a finite patch of emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 48:W09517. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012224

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zong L, Nepf H (2010) Flow and deposition in and around a finite patch of vegetation. Geomorphology 116:363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gurnell AM, Petts GE, Hannah DM et al (2001) Riparian vegetation and island formation along the gravel-bed Fiume Tagliamento, Italy. Earth Surf Process Landf 26:31–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9837(200101)26:1%3c31:AID-ESP155%3e3.0.CO;2-Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cellino M, Lemmin U (2004) Influence of coherent flow structures on the dynamics of suspended sediment transport in open-channel flow. J Hydraul Eng 130:1077–1088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:11(1077)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sand-Jensen K, Mebus JR (1996) Fine-scale patterns of water velocity within macrophyte patches in streams. Oikos 76:169. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Meire DWSA, Kondziolka JM, Nepf HM (2014) Interaction between neighboring vegetation patches: impact on flow and deposition. Water Resour Res 50:3809–3825. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen Z, Jiang C, Nepf H (2013) Flow adjustment at the leading edge of a submerged aquatic canopy: flow adjustment through a submerged canopy. Water Resour Res 49:5537–5551. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koch E (1994) Hydrodynamics, diffusion-boundary layers and photosynthesis of the seagrasses Thalassia testudinum and Cymodocea nodosa. Mar Biol 118:767–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Baptist MJ (2003) A flume experiment on sediment transport with flexible, submerged vegetation. In: International workshop on riparian forest vegetated channels: hydraulic, morphological and ecological aspects, RIPFOR, Trento, Italy

  38. Järvelä J (2005) Effect of submerged flexible vegetation on flow structure and resistance. J Hydrol 307:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Martinez AE, McDowell PF (2016) Invasive Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) and native vegetation channel roughness. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 9:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00046.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu C, Nepf H (2016) Sediment deposition within and around a finite patch of model vegetation over a range of channel velocity: sediment deposition within and around a vegetation patch. Water Resour Res 52:600–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Le Bouteiller C, Venditti JG (2015) Sediment transport and shear stress partitioning in a vegetated flow: shear stress partitioning in a vegetated flow. Water Resour Res 51:2901–2922. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Poggi D, Porporato A, Ridolfi L et al (2004) The effect of vegetation density on canopy sub-layer turbulence. Bound Layer Meteorol 111:565–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bywater-Reyes S, Wilcox AC, Diehl RM (2017) Multiscale influence of woody riparian vegetation on fluvial topography quantified with ground-based and airborne lidar: woody vegetation and fluvial topography. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 122:1218–1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF004058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Västilä K, Järvelä J (2014) Modeling the flow resistance of woody vegetation using physically based properties of the foliage and stem: modeling the flow resistance of woody vegetation. Water Resour Res 50:229–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Goring DG, Walsh JM, Rutschmann P, Trösch J (1997) Modelling the distribution of velocity in a river cross-section. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 31:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1997.9516754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Church M (2006) Bed material transport and the morphology of alluvial river channels. Rev Earth Planet Sci 34:325–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yager EM, Schmeeckle MW (2013) The influence of vegetation on turbulence and bed load transport. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 118:1585–1601. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wahl TL (2000) Analyzing ADV data using WinADV. In: Proceedings of joint conference on water resources engineering and water resources planning and management. ASCE Reston, Va., pp 1–10

  49. Goring DG, Nikora VI (2002) Despiking acoustic doppler velocimeter data. J Hydraul Eng 128:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Leica Cyclone. Leica Geosystems, San Ramon, California

  51. Elliott S (2016) Physical modelling of the feedbacks between a Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) patch, hydraulics, and bedform evolution. Oregon State University, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  52. (2013) ArcGIS Desktop. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA

  53. Julien PY (2002) River mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. Gerrard JH (1966) The mechanics of the formation region of vortices behind bluff bodies. J Fluid Mech 25:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Perry AE, Chong MS, Lim TT (1982) The vortex-shedding process behind two-dimensional bluff-bodies. J Fluid Mech 116:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim I, Wu XL (2015) Unified Strouhal-Reynolds number relationship for laminar vortex streets generated by different-shaped obstacles. Phys Rev E. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.043011

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wilson CAME, Stoesser T, Bates PD, Batemann Pinzen A (2003) Open channel flow through different forms of submerged flexible vegetation. J Hydraul Eng 129:847–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the American Association of University Women and Ron and Betty Minor for financial assistance, Dr. Chad Higgins for technical assistance, the Earth Foundation for the use of their LiDAR scanner, and Adam Elliott for construction assistance and moral support. We also gratefully acknowledge the detailed comments of three anonymous reviewers, whose feedback significantly improved the original manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA

    Susan H. Elliott, Desirée D. Tullos & Cara Walter

Authors
  1. Susan H. Elliott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Desirée D. Tullos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cara Walter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan H. Elliott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elliott, S.H., Tullos, D.D. & Walter, C. Physical modeling of the feedbacks between a patch of flexible Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), wake hydraulics, and downstream deposition. Environ Fluid Mech 19, 255–277 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-018-9622-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-018-9622-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation