Skip to main content
Log in

Flows across high aspect ratio street canyons: Reynolds number independence revisited

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Reynolds number for flow in a street canyon, Re = UrefH/ν (where Uref is a reference velocity, H the street canyon height, and ν the kinematic viscosity), cannot be matched between reduced-scale experiments and full-scale field measurements. This mismatch is often circumvented by satisfying the Re independence criterion, which states that above a critical Re (Rec), the flow field remains invariant with Re. Rec = 11,000 is often adopted in reduced-scale experiments. In deep street canyons with height-to-width aspect ratio ≥ 1.5, reduced-scale experiments have shown two recirculation vortices induced by the mean flows, but full-scale field measurements have observed only one vortex. We investigated this discrepancy by conducting water channel experiments with Re between 104 and 105 at three aspect ratios. The canyons with aspect ratio 1.0 have Rec = 11,000, the canyons with aspect ratio 1.5 have Rec between 31,000 and 58,000, while the canyons with aspect ratio 2.0 have Rec between 57,000 and 87,000. Therefore, the widely adopted Rec = 11,000 is not applicable for canyons with aspect ratio greater than 1.5. Our results also confirm that there is only one vortex in deep canyons at high Re. This single-vortex flow regime could change our fundamental understanding of deep canyons, which are often assumed to exhibit multiple-vortex flow regimes. Applications such as numerical model validation based on the multiple-vortex regime should be revisited. Our experimental data with Re up to 105 could be used to validate numerical models at high Re.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmad K, Khare M, Chaudhry K (2005) Wind tunnel simulation studies on dispersion at urban street canyons and intersections—a review. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 93:697–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aliabadi AA (2018) Theory and applications of turbulence: a fundamental approach for scientists and engineers. Amir A. Aliabadi Publications, Guelph

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aliabadi AA, Krayenhoff ES, Nazarian N, Chew LW, Armstrong PR, Afshari A, Norford LK (2017) Effects of roof-edge roughness on air temperature and pollutant concentration in urban canyons. Bound Layer Meteorol 164:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baik J-J, Park R-S, Chun H-Y, Kim J-J (2000) A laboratory model of urban street-canyon flows. J Appl Meteorol 39:1592–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Britter R, Hanna S (2003) Flow and dispersion in urban areas. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:469–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown MJ, Lawson RE, DeCroix DS, Lee RL (2000) Mean flow and turbulence measurements around a 2-D array of buildings in a wind tunnel. In: 11th Joint AMS/AWMA conference on the applications of air pollution meteorology. Long Beach, CA

  7. Castro I, Robins A (1977) The flow around a surface-mounted cube in uniform and turbulent streams. J Fluid Mech 79:307–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caton F, Britter RE, Dalziel S (2003) Dispersion mechanisms in a street canyon. Atmos Environ 37:693–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chew LW (2017) Passive enhancement of air flow at pedestrian level in built environments. Master thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  10. Chew LW, Nazarian N, Norford L (2017) Pedestrian-level urban wind flow enhancement with wind catchers. Atmosphere 8:159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DePaul F, Sheih C (1986) Measurements of wind velocities in a street canyon. Atmos Environ 1967 20:455–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eliasson I, Offerle B, Grimmond C, Lindqvist S (2006) Wind fields and turbulence statistics in an urban street canyon. Atmos Environ 40:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernando H, Lee S, Anderson J, Princevac M, Pardyjak E, Grossman-Clarke S (2001) Urban fluid mechanics: air circulation and contaminant dispersion in cities. Environ Fluid Mech 1:107–164. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011504001479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerdes F, Olivari D (1999) Analysis of pollutant dispersion in an urban street canyon. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 82:105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang Y, Hu X, Zeng N (2009) Impact of wedge-shaped roofs on airflow and pollutant dispersion inside urban street canyons. Build Environ 44:2335–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanda M (2006) Progress in the scale modeling of urban climate. Theor Appl Climatol 84:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kastner-Klein P, Fedorovich E, Rotach M (2001) A wind tunnel study of organised and turbulent air motions in urban street canyons. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 89:849–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klein P, Clark JV (2007) Flow variability in a North American downtown street canyon. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46:851–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koutsourakis N, Bartzis JG, Markatos NC (2012) Evaluation of Reynolds stress, k–ε and RNG k–ε turbulence models in street canyon flows using various experimental datasets. Environ Fluid Mech 12:379–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-012-9240-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kovar-Panskus A, Moulinneuf L, Savory E, Abdelqari A, Sini J-F, Rosant J-M, Robins A, Toy N (2002) A wind tunnel investigation of the influence of solar-induced wall-heating on the flow regime within a simulated urban street canyon. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 2:555–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li X-X, Leung DY, Liu C-H, Lam K (2008) Physical modeling of flow field inside urban street canyons. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:2058–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li X-X, Liu C-H, Leung DY, Lam K (2006) Recent progress in CFD modelling of wind field and pollutant transport in street canyons. Atmos Environ 40:5640–5658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lim HC, Castro IP, Hoxey RP (2007) Bluff bodies in deep turbulent boundary layers: Reynolds-number issues. J Fluid Mech 571:97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Louka P, Belcher S, Harrison R (2000) Coupling between air flow in streets and the well-developed boundary layer aloft. Atmos Environ 34:2613–2621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Louka P, Vachon G, Sini J-F, Mestayer P, Rosant J-M (2002) Thermal effects on the airflow in a street canyon–Nantes’ 99 experimental results and model simulations. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 2:351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Magnusson S, Dallman A, Entekhabi D, Britter R, Fernando HJ, Norford L (2014) On thermally forced flows in urban street canyons. Environ Fluid Mech 14:1427–1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9353-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Memon RA, Leung D (2011) On the heating environment in street canyon. Environ Fluid Mech 11:465–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Meroney RN, Pavageau M, Rafailidis S, Schatzmann M (1996) Study of line source characteristics for 2-D physical modelling of pollutant dispersion in street canyons. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 62:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakamura Y, Oke TR (1988) Wind, temperature and stability conditions in an east-west oriented urban canyon. Atmos Environ 1967 22:2691–2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Offerle B, Eliasson I, Grimmond C, Holmer B (2007) Surface heating in relation to air temperature, wind and turbulence in an urban street canyon. Bound Layer Meteorol 122:273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Oke T (1987) Boundary layer climates, 2nd edn. Methuen, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Santamouris M, Papanikolaou N, Koronakis I, Livada I, Asimakopoulos D (1999) Thermal and air flow characteristics in a deep pedestrian canyon under hot weather conditions. Atmos Environ 33:4503–4521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Snyder WH (1981) Guideline for fluid modeling of atmospheric diffusion. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park

    Google Scholar 

  34. Uehara K, Wakamatsu S, Ooka R (2003) Studies on critical Reynolds number indices for wind-tunnel experiments on flow within urban areas. Bound Layer Meteorol 107:353–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vardoulakis S, Fisher BE, Pericleous K, Gonzalez-Flesca N (2003) Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmos Environ 37:155–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xie X, Huang Z, Wang J (2005) Impact of building configuration on air quality in street canyon. Atmos Environ 39:4519–4530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yamartino RJ, Wiegand G (1986) Development and evaluation of simple models for the flow, turbulence and pollutant concentration fields within an urban street canyon. Atmos Environ 1967 20:2137–2156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zajic D, Fernando H, Calhoun R, Princevac M, Brown M, Pardyjak E (2011) Flow and turbulence in an urban canyon. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 50:203–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zajic D, Fernando HJ, Brown MJ, Pardyjak ER (2015) On flows in simulated urban canopies. Environ Fluid Mech 15:275–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9311-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise programme. The authors thank Prof. Rajasekhar Balasubramanian and Dr. Kian Yew Lim for discussions on the experimental setup and result analyses. Help from the technical staff in the Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lup Wai Chew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chew, L.W., Aliabadi, A.A. & Norford, L.K. Flows across high aspect ratio street canyons: Reynolds number independence revisited. Environ Fluid Mech 18, 1275–1291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-018-9601-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-018-9601-0

Keywords

Navigation