Advertisement

Environmental Fluid Mechanics

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1203–1226 | Cite as

Interaction of North Brazil Current rings with the Lesser Antilles Arc and Barbados Island: laboratory experiments and observations

  • R. C. Cruz-Gómez
  • Heriberto J. Vazquez
Original Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The interaction of North Brazil Current (NBC) rings with the Lesser Antilles Arc (LAA) and the Barbados Island (BI) is addressed by experimental modeling and observations. Our results compare well with previous experimental results and numerical simulations. Several sizes, intensities and two different vorticity profiles (non-isolated and initially isolated vortices) were tested. Three regimes were found namely: (1) the vortex surrounds the BI and its translational motion (TM) stops North of BI; (2) the vortex passes through the corridor between the LAA and the BI by reducing its size; and (3) The vortex stopped at the entrance to the corridor South of the BI. Isolated vortices were prone to stopped North of the BI. Apparently the intensity in the outer vorticity ring has an influence on the fate of the NBC ring. Non-isolated vortices can also stop its TM North of the BI because when in \(\beta\) plane they develop an outer ring similar to the isolated vortices. From these results we conclude that intense and big NBC rings are likely to stop its TM North of the BI. Medium and moderate vortices stops its TM South of the BI and they reduce their size until they are able to pass through the corridor between the LAA and the BI. Mild vortices of all sizes stop South of the corridor, close to the BI and the LAA. Drifter trajectories and Sea Surface Height altimetry confirm the results.

Keywords

NBC rings Lesser Antilles Arc Isolated vortex Non-isolated vortex Rotating table 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The experiments were performed at the rotating table of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory of CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, México. HJV was supported by the Office of Naval Research Grant N00014-15-1-2285. The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments and discussions with Patrice Le Gal on early versions of the manuscript and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions to improve the quality of this manuscript. The altimeter products were produced by Ssalto/Duacs and distributed by Aviso, with support from CNES (http://www.aviso.altimetry.fr/duacs/). We thank the NOAA’s Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) team for buoys data.

References

  1. 1.
    Fuglister FC (1972) Cyclonic rings formed by the golf stream, 1965–1966. in studies of physical oceanography. In: Studies in Physical Oceanography: A Tribute to Georg Wüst on his 80th Birthday (ed. A. L. Gordon) (1):137–168Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goni GJ, Johns WE (2001) A census of North Brazil Current rings observed from T/P altimetry: 1992–1998. Geophys Res Lett 28(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson DW, Johns WE, Garzoli SL (2002) Velocity structure of North Brazil Current rings. Geophys Res Lett 29(8):1273Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castelão GP, Johns WE (2011) Sea surface structure of North Brazil Current rings derived from shipboard and moored acoustic Doppler current profiler observations. J Geophys Res 116:C01010Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacob JP, Chassignet EP, Dewar W (2002) Influence of topography on the propagation of isolated eddies. J Phys Oceanogr 32:2848–2869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fratantoni DM, Richardson PL (2006) The evolution and demise of North Brazil Current rings. J Phys Oceanogr 36(7):1241–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fratantoni DM, Glikson DA (2002) North Brazil Current ring generation and evolution observed with SeaWiFS. J Phys Oceanogr 36(7):1241–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goni GJ, Johns WE (2003) Synoptic study of worm rings in the North Brazil current retroflection region using satellite altimetry. In: Goni GJ, Malanotte-Rizzoli P (eds) Interhemispheric water exchange in the Atlantic Ocean. Elsevier Ocean Series, 335–356Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mertens Ch, Rhein M, Walter M, Kirchner K (2009) Modulation of the inflow into the Caribbean Sea by North Brazil Current rings. Deep Sea Res I 56:1057–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cruz-Gómez RC, Bulgakov SN (2007) Remote sensing observations of the coherent and non-coherent ring structures in the vicinity of Lesser Antilles. Ann Geophys 25:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cowen RK, Sponaugle S, Paris CB, Fortuna JL, Lwiza KMM, Dorsey S (2003) Impact of North Brazil Current rings on local circulation and coral reefsh recruitment to Barbados, West Indies. Elsevier Oceanogr Ser 68:443–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simmons HL, Nof D (2002) The squeezing of eddies through gaps. J Phys Oceanogr 32:314–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jochumsen K, Rhein M, Hüttl-Kabus S, Böning CW (2010) On the propagation and decay of North Brazil Current rings. J Geophys Res 115:C10004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adduce C, Cenedese C (2004) An experimental study of a mesoscale vortex colliding with topography of varying geometry in a rotating fluid. J Mar Res 62:611–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cenedese C (2002) Laboratory experiments on mesoscale vortices colliding with a seamount. J Geophys Res 107(C6)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cenedese C, Adduce C, Fratantoni DM (2005) Laboratory experiments on mesoscale vortices interacting with two islands. J Geophys Res 110:C09023.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cenedese C, Tanabe A (2008) Laboratory experiments on mesoscale vortices colliding with an island chain. J Geophys Res 113:C04022Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cruz-Gómez RC (2013) Experimental investigation of the North Brazil Current rings during their interaction with the Lesser Antilles. In: Fluid Dynamics in Physics, Engineering and Environmental Applications, Environmental Science and Engineering, edited by Jaime Klapp, Abraham Medina, Anne Cros, Carlos A. Vargas. Springer, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27723-8-4
  19. 19.
    Flór JB, Eames I (2002) Dynamics of monopolar vortices on a topographic beta-plane. J Fluid Mech 456:353–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carnevale GF, Kloosterziel RC, van Heijst GJF (1991) Propagation of barotropic bortices over topography in a rotating tank. J Fluid Mech 233:119–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Heijst GJF, Kloosterziel RC, Williams CWM (1991) Laboratory experiments on the tripolar vortex in a rotating fluid. J Fluid Mech 225:301–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Afanasyev YD, Wells J (2005) Quasi-two-dimensional turbulence on the polar beta-plane: laboratory experiments. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 99:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cruz-Gómez RC, Zavala Sansón L, Pinilla MA (2013) Generation of isolated vortices in a rotating fluid by means of an electromagnetic method. Exp Fluids 54:1582–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Heijst GJF (1994) Topographic effects on vortices in a rotating fluid. Meccanica 29:431–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hopfinger EJ, van Heijst GJF (1993) Vortices in rotating fluid. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 25:241–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zavala Sansón L, van Heijst GJF, Janssen FJJ (1999) Experiments on barotrophic vortex-wall interaction on a topographic \(\beta\)-plane. J Geophys Res 104:10917–10932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McDonald RN (1998) The decay of cyclonic eddies by Rossby wave radiation. J Fluid Mech 361:237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cruz-Gómez RC, Salcedo-Castro J (2013) Analysis of horizontal and vertical ring structure based on analytical model and satellite data: application to the North Brazil Current rings. Ocean Sci J 48(2):161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carton XJ, Flierl GR, Polvani LM (1989) The generation of tripoles from unstable axisymmetric isolated vortex structures. Europhys Lett 9:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wei J, Wang D-P, Flagg ChN (2008) Mapping Gulf Stream warm core rings from shipboard ADCP transects of the Oleander Project. J Geophys Res 113:C10021CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de FísicaUniversidad de GuadalajaraGuadalajaraMéxico
  2. 2.Scripps Institution of Oceanography, CASPOSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations