Skip to main content
Log in

Use of internal boundary conditions for levees representation: application to river flood management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

River floods can be simulated with the 2D shallow water system of equations using finite volume methods, where the terrain is discretized in cells that form the computational mesh. Usually a proper treatment of wet/dry fronts is required. River levees can be modelled as part of the topography by means of sufficiently small cells of higher elevation than the rest of the bed level in locally refined meshes. This procedure is associated with a large computational time since the time step depends directly on the cell size. The alternative proposed in this work includes the levees as internal boundary conditions in the 2D numerical scheme. In particular, levees have been defined by a weir law that, depending on the relative values of water surface levels on both sides, can formulate the discharge for different situations (i.e. free flow and submerged flow). In addition, having identified numerical difficulties in cases of low discharge under free flow conditions, a novel procedure to avoid oscillations has been developed and called volume transport method. The validation and comparison between methods has been carried out with benchmark test cases and, in addition, with a real flood event in the Ebro River (Spain)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arcement GJ, Schneider VR (1984) Guide for selecting Manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains, 2339 U.S. Geological Survey (Water Supply paper)

  2. Chanson H (2004) Hydraulics of open channel flow. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caviedes-Voullieme D, Garcia-Navarro P, Murillo J (2012) Influence of mesh structure on 2D full shallow water equations and SCS curve number simulation of rainfall/runoff events. J Hydrol 448:39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Baldassarre G, Casterllarin A, Brath A (2009) Anlaysis of the effects of levee heightening on flood propagation: example to the River Po, Italy. Hydrol Sci J 54(6):1007–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. González-Sanchís M, Murillo J, Latorre B, Comín F, García-Navarro P (2012) Transient two-dimensional simulation of real flood events in a mediterranean floodplain. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 138(7):629–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Henderson FM (1966) Open channel flow. Macmillan series in civil engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaffe DA, Sanders BF (2001) Engineered levee breaches for flood mitigation. J Hydraul Eng 127(6):471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leveque R (2002) Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problem. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Murillo J, García-Navarro P, Burguete J, Brufau P (2007) The influence of source terms on stability, accuracy and conservation in two-dimensional shallow flow simulation using triangular finite volumes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54(5):543–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. UK Environmental Agency (2010) Benchmarking of 2D hydraulic modelling packages, Environment Agency Report

  11. Morales-Hernández M, Murillo J, García-Navarro P (2013) The formulation of internal boundary conditions in unsteady 2D shallow water flows: application to flood regulation. Water Resour Res 80:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morales-Hernández M, Hubbard ME, García-Navarro P (2014) A 2D extension of a large time step explicit scheme (CFL \(>\) 1) for unsteady problems with wet/dry boundaries. J Comput Phys 263:303–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Remo JWF, Carlson M, Printer N (2012) Hydraulic and flood-loss modelling of levee, floodplain, and river management strategies, Middle Mississippi River USA. Nat Hazards 61:551–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schubert JE, Sanders BF, Smith MJ, Wright NG (2008) Unstructured mesh generation and landcover-based resistance for hydrodynamic modelling of urban flooding. Adv Water Resour 31:1603–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Villemonte JR (1947) Submerged-Weir discharge studies. Engineering News Record

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by the MINECO/FEDER under research Project CGL2015-66114-R and by Diputacion General de Aragon, DGA, through Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, FEDER. The third author also wants to thank to the MINECO for his Research Grant DI-14-06987.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Echeverribar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Echeverribar, I., Morales-Hernández, M., Brufau, P. et al. Use of internal boundary conditions for levees representation: application to river flood management. Environ Fluid Mech 19, 1253–1271 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-018-09658-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-018-09658-6

Keywords

Navigation