Skip to main content
Log in

Visualization of the internal flow properties and the material exchange interface in an entraining viscous Newtonian gravity current

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to simulate a simple entraining geophysical flow, a viscous Newtonian gravity current is released from a reservoir by a dam-break and flows along a rigid horizontal bed until it meets a layer of entrainable material of finite depth, identical to the current. The goal is to examine the entrainment mechanisms by observing the interaction between the incoming flow and the loose bed. The sole parameter varied is the initial volume of the gravity current, thus altering its height and velocity. The gravity current plunges or spills into the entrainable bed and the velocity of the flow front becomes linear with time. The bed material is directly affected: motion is generated in the fluid far downstream of, and in that lying beneath the encroaching front. Shear bands are identified, separating horizontal flow downstream from flow with a strong vertical component close to the step. Downstream of the step the flow is horizontal and stratified, with no slip on the bottom boundary and very low shear near the surface. Between these two regions may lie transitional zones with linear velocity profiles, separated by horizontal bands of high shear; the number of transitional zones in the cross-section varies with the initial volume of the dam-break.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adduce C, Sciortino G, Proietti S (2012) Gravity currents produced by lock-exchanges: experiments and simulations with a two layer shallow-water model with entrainment. J Hydraul Eng 138(2):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ancey C, Gervasoni C, Meunier M (2004) Computing extreme avalanches. Cold Reg Sci Technol 39:161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andreini N (2012) Dam break of Newtonian fluids and granular suspensions. PhD Thesis, EPFL, Switzerland

  4. Andreini N, Epely-Chauvin G, Ancey C (2012) Internal dynamics of Newtonian and viscoplastic fluid avalanches down a sloping bed. Phys Fluids 24(5):053101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbolini M, Biancardi A, Cappabianca F, Natale L, Pagliardi M (2005) Laboratory study of erosion processes in snow avalanches. Cold Reg Sci Technol 43(1–2):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger C, McArdell BW, Schlunegger F (2011) Direct measurement of channel erosion by debris flows, Illgraben, Switzerland. J Geophys Res 116:F01002

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cannon SH, Savage WZ (1988) A mass-change model for the estimation of debris-flow runout. J Geol 96(2):221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen H, Crosta GB, Lee CF (2006) Erosional effects on runout of fast landslides, debris flows and avalanches: a numerical investigation. Geotechniques 56(5):305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Delannay R, Louge M, Richard P, Taberlet N, Valance A (2007) Towards a theoretical picture of dense granular flows down inclines. Nat Mater 6(2):99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Egashira S, Itoh T, Takeuchi H (2001) Transition mechanism of debris flows over rigid bed to over erodible bed. Phys Chem Earth B 26(2):169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eglit ME, Demidov KS (2005) Mathematical modeling of snow entrainment in avalanche motion. Cold Reg Sci Technol 43(1–2):10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Estep J, Dufek J (2012) Substrate effects from force chain dynamics in dense granular flows. J Geophys Res 117:F01028

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gauer P, Issler D (2004) Possible erosion mechanisms in snow avalanches. Ann Glaciol 38:384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gray JMNT (2001) Granular flow in partially filled slowly rotating drums. J Fluid Mech 441:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hungr D, Evans SG (2004) Entrainment of debris in rock avalanches: an analysis of a long run-out mechanism. Geol Soc Am Bull 116(9–10):1240–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huppert HE (1982) The propagation of two-dimensional and axisymmetric viscous gravity currents over a rigid horizontal surface. J Fluid Mech 121:43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iverson RM (2012) Elementary theory of bed-sediment entrainment by debris flows and avalanches. J Geophys Res 117:F03006

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iverson RM, Reid ME, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Godt JW, Griswold JP (2011) Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sediment. Nat Geosci 4(2):116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Le L, Pitman EB (2009) A model for granular flows over an erodible surface. SIAM J Appl Math 70(5):1407–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luna BQ, Remaitre A, van Asch TWJ, Malet JP, van Westen CJ (2012) Analysis of debris flow behavior with a one dimensional run-out model incorporating entrainment. Eng Geol 128:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mangeney A, Tsimring LS, Volfson D, Aranson IS, Bouchut F (2007) Avalanche mobility induced by the presence of an erodible bed and associated entrainment. Geophys Res Lett 34:L22401

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mangeney A, Roche O, Hungr O, Mangold N, Faccanoni G, Lucas A (2010) Erosion and mobility in granular collapse over sloping beds. J Geophys Res 115:F03040

    Google Scholar 

  23. McCoy SW, Kean JW, Coe JA, Tucker GE, Staley DM, Wasklewicz TA (2012) Sediment entrainment by debris flows: in situ measurements from the headwaters of a steep catchment. J Geophys Res 117:F03016

    Google Scholar 

  24. McDougall S, Hungr O (2005) Dynamic modelling of entrainment in rapid landslides. Can Geotech J 42(5):1437–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Melosh HJ (1986) The physics of very large landslides. Acta Mech 64:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moffatt HK (1964) Viscous and resistive eddies near a sharp corner. J Fluid Mech 18:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pierson TC (1995) Flow characteristics of large eruption-triggered debris flows at snow-clad volcanos—constraints for debris-flow models. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 66(1–4):283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schurch P, Densmore AL, Rosser NJ, McArdell BW (2011) Dynamic controls on erosion and deposition on debris-flow fans. Geology 39(9):827–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Skeel RD, Berzins M (1990) A method for the spatial discretization of parabolic equations in one space variable. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 11:132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sovilla B, Bartelt P (2002) Observations and modelling of snow avalanche entrainment. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2:169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sovilla B, Sommavilla F, Tomaselli A (2001) Measurements of mass balance in dense snow avalanche events. Ann Glaciol 32:230–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sovilla B, Burlando P, Bartelt P (2006) Field experiments and numerical modeling of mass entrainment in snow avalanches. J Geophys Res 111:F03007

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sveen JK (2004) An introduction to matpiv v. 1.6.1. Technical report, University of Oslo

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne. Many thanks to Nicolas Andreini, Gaël Epely-Chauvin and Bob de Graffenried for their help and guidance during this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Belinda Bates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bates, B., Ancey, C. & Busson, J. Visualization of the internal flow properties and the material exchange interface in an entraining viscous Newtonian gravity current. Environ Fluid Mech 14, 501–518 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9297-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9297-0

Keywords

Navigation