Advertisement

Environmental Fluid Mechanics

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 25–49 | Cite as

Initial mixing of inclined dense jet in perpendicular crossflow

  • Chris C. K. Lai
  • Joseph H. W. LeeEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

A comprehensive experimental investigation for an inclined (\(60^{\circ }\) to vertical) dense jet in perpendicular crossflow—with a three-dimensional trajectory—is reported. The detailed tracer concentration field in the vertical cross-section of the bent-over jet is measured by the laser-induced fluorescence technique for a wide range of jet densimetric Froude number \(Fr\) and ambient to jet velocity ratios \(U_r\). The jet trajectory and dilution determined from a large number of cross-sectional scalar fields are interpreted by the Lagrangian model over the entire range of jet-dominated to crossflow-dominated regimes. The mixing during the ascent phase of the dense jet resembles that of an advected jet or line puff and changes to a negatively buoyant thermal on descent. It is found that the mixing behavior is governed by a crossflow Froude number \(\mathbf{F} = U_r Fr\). For \(\mathbf{F} < 0.8\), the mixing is jet-dominated and governed by shear entrainment; significant detrainment occurs and the maximum height of rise \(Z_{max}\) is under-predicted as in the case of a dense jet in stagnant fluid. While the jet trajectory in the horizontal momentum plane is well-predicted, the measurements indicate a greater rise and slower descent. For \(\mathbf{F} \ge 0.8\) the dense jet becomes significantly bent-over during its ascent phase; the jet mixing is dominated by vortex entrainment. For \(\mathbf{F} \ge 2\), the detrainment ceases to have any effect on the jet behavior. The jet trajectory in both the horizontal momentum and buoyancy planes are well predicted by the model. Despite the under-prediction of terminal rise, the jet dilution at a large number of cross-sections covering the ascent and descent of the dense jet are well-predicted. Both the terminal rise and the initial dilution for the inclined jet in perpendicular crossflow are smaller than those of a corresponding vertical jet. Both the maximum terminal rise \(Z_{max}\) and horizontal lateral penetration \(Y_{max}\) follow a \(\mathbf{F}^{-1/2}\) dependence in the crossflow-dominated regime. The initial dilution at terminal rise follows a \(S \sim \mathbf{F}^{1/3}\) dependence.

Keywords

Mixing and transport Negative buoyant jets Dense jets Desalination Vortex entrainment Jet integral models 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by a Grant from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (HKU 713908E)

References

  1. 1.
    Latteman S, Hopner T (2008) Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination. Desalination 220:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abessi O, Saeedi M, Bleninger T, Davidson M (2012) Surface discharge of negatively buoyant effluent in unstratified stagnant water. J Hydro-Environ Res 6(3):181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zeitoun MA, Reid RO, McHihenny WF, Mitchell TM (1970) Model studies of outfall system for desalination plants, Research and Development Progress Rep. 804, Office of saline water, U.S. Dept. of Interior, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roberts PJW, Toms G (1987) Inclined dense jets in flowing current. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 113(3):323–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roberts PJW, Daviero G (1997) Mixing in inclined dense jets. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 123(8):693–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kikkert GA, Davidson MJ, Nokes RI (2007) Inclined negatively buoyant discharges. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 133(5):545–554Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shao D, Law AWK (2010) Mixing and boundary interaction of 30deg and 45deg inclined dense jets. Environ Fluid Mech 10(5):521–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papakonstantis IG, Christodoulou GC, Papanicolaou PN (2011a) Inclined negatively buoyant jets 1: geometrical characteristics. J Hyd Res 49(1):3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lai CCK, Lee JHW (2012) Mixing of inclined dense jets in stationary ambient. J Hydro-Environ Res IAHR-APD 6(1):9–28Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fischer HB, List EJ, Koh RCY, Imberger J, Brooks NH (1979) Mixing in inland and coastal waters. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee JHW, Chu VH (2003) Turbulent jets and plumes—a Lagrangian approach. Kluwer Academic Publisher, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ayoub GM (1973) Test results on buoyant jets injected horizontally in a cross flowing stream. Water Air Soil Pollut 2(4):409–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheung V (1991) Mixing of a round buoyant jet in a current. PhD Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, p 202Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tong SS, Stolzenbach KD (1979) Submerged discharges of dense effluent, Rept. No. 243, Ralph M. Parsons Lab., MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindberg WR (1994) Experiments on negatively buoyant jets, with and without crossflow. NATO advanced research workshop on “Recent advances in jets and plumes” NATO ASI Series E. Kluwer Academic, Viana do Castelo, Portugal 255:131–145Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kikkert GA, Davidson MJ, Nokes RI (2010) Buoyant jets with three-dimensional trajectories. J. Hydraul Res 48(3):292–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gungor E, Roberts PJW (2009) Experimental studies on vertical dense jets in a flowing current. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 135(11):935–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pincince AB, List EJ (1973) Disposal of brine into an estuary. J Water Pollut Control Fed 45(11):2335–2344Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Palomar P, Lara JL, Losada IJ (2012) Near field brine discharge modeling part 2: validation of commercial tools. Desalination 290:28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jirka GH (2004) Integral model for turbulent buoyant jets in unbounded stratified flows. Part 1. The single round jets. Environ Fluid Mech 4:1–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frick WE (2004) Visual plume mixing zone modelling software. Environ Model Softw 19:645–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee JHW, Cheung V (1990) Generalized Lagrangian model for buoyant jets in current. J Environ Eng ASCE 116(6):1085–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee JHW, Cheung V, Wang WP, Cheung SKB (2000) Lagrangian modeling and visualization of rosette outfall plumes. Proc. Hydroinformatics 2000, University of Iowa, July 23–27, 2000 (CDROM).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee JHW (2012) The hunter rouse lecture—mixing of multiple buoyant jets. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 138(12):1008–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lai ACH, Yu D, Lee JHW (2011) Mixing of a rosette jet group in a crossflow. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 137(8):787–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lai CCK (2009) Mixing of inclined dense jets. MPhil Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, p 132Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chu PCK (1996) Mixing of advected line puffs. PhD Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, p 222Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zachry Department of Civil EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations