Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

LES of lock-exchange compositional gravity currents: a brief review of some recent results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three-dimensional 3-D Large eddy simulation (LES) has become a powerful tool to investigate evolution and structure of gravity currents, especially for cases (e.g., high Reynolds number flows, flows with massive separation) where 3-D Direct numerical simulation using non-dissipative viscous solvers is computationally too expensive. In this paper we briefly review some important results obtained based on high-resolution 3-D LES of bottom-propagating compositional Boussinesq currents in lock-exchange configurations. LES was used to provide a detailed description of the structure of the current, to discuss the role of the large-scale coherent structures, and to predict the evolution of the front velocity over the different stages of the current propagation. Three main types of lock-exchange flows are considered: (1) currents with a high volume of release (HVR) and a low volume of release (LVR) propagating in a channel with a smooth horizontal bed; (2) HVR and LVR currents propagating in a horizontal channel containing a porous layer; and (3) currents propagating in a horizontal channel containing an array of bottom obstacles (2-D dunes and ribs). The simulations are performed using non-dissipative numerical algorithms and sub-grid scale models that predict a zero eddy viscosity in regions where the turbulence is negligible. Experimental data is used to validate LES predictions. LES results show that in most cases the evolution of the front velocity is consistent with that predicted based on shallow-flow theory. LES flow fields are then used to estimate important quantities (e.g., bed friction velocity, sediment entrainment capacity) that are very difficult to obtain from experiments and to understand how the structure and evolution of the current change because of the additional drag induced by obstacles present within the channel or at the channel bed. The paper also discusses how the evolution and structure of the current change as the Reynolds number is increased to values that are relevant for gravity currents encountered in geosciences and environmental engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonometti T, Ungarish M, Balachandar S (2011) A numerical investigation of constant volume non-Boussinesq gravity currents in deep ambient. J Fluid Mech 673:574–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonometti T, Balachandar S, Magnaudet J (2008) Wall effects in non-Boussinesq density currents. J Fluid Mech 616:445–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Britter RE, Simpson JE (1978) Experiments on the dynamics of a gravity current head. J Fluid Mech 88:223–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cantero MI, Lee JR, Balachandar S, Garcia MH (2007) On the front velocity of gravity currents. J Fluid Mech 586:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cantero MI, Balachandar S, Garcia M, Bock D (2008) Turbulent structures in planar gravity currents and their influence on the flow dynamics. J Geophys Res Oceans 113:C08018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang KS, Constantinescu SG, Park S (2006) Analysis of the flow and mass transfer process for the incompressible flow past an open cavity with a laminar and a fully turbulent incoming boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 561:113–145

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang KS, Constantinescu SG, Park S (2007) The purging of a neutrally buoyant or a dense miscible contaminant from a rectangular cavity. Part II: the case of an incoming fully turbulent overflow. J Hydraul Eng 133(4):373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chimney MJ, Wenkert L, Pietro KC (2006) Patterns of vertical stratification in a subtropical constructed wetland in south Florida (USA). Ecol Eng 27:322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coates M, Ferris J (1994) The radiatively-driven natural convection beneath a floating plant layer. Limnol Oceanogr 39(5):1186–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dai A, Ozdemir CE, Cantero MI, Balachandar S (2012) Gravity currents from instantaneous sources down a slope. J Hydraul Eng 138(3):237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Engelund F, Hansen E (1967) A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams. Teknisk Vorlag, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ermanyuk EV, Gavrilov NV (2005) Interaction of an internal gravity current with a submerged circular cylinder. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 46(2):216–223

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ermanyuk EV, Gavrilov NV (2005) Interaction of an internal gravity current with an obstacle on the channel bottom. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 46(4):489–495

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez-Juez E, Meiburg E, Constantinescu G (2009) Gravity currents impinging on bottom mounted square cylinders: flow fields and associated forces. J Fluid Mech 631:65–102

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gonzalez-Juez E, Meiburg E, Constantinescu GS (2009) The interaction of gravity current with a circular cylinder mounted above a wall: effect of the gap size. J Fluids Struct 25:629–640

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalez-Juez E, Meiburg E, Constantinescu G (2010) Gravity current flow past a circular cylinder: forces and wall shear stresses and implications for scour. J Fluid Mech 649:69–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hallez Y, Magnaudet J (2008) Effects of channel geometry on buoyancy-driven mixing. Phys Fluids 20:053306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Härtel C, Meiburg E, Necker F (2000) Analysis and direct numerical simulation of the flow at a gravity-current head. Part 1: flow topology and front speed for slip and no-slip boundaries. J Fluid Mech 418:189–212

    Google Scholar 

  19. Härtel C, Carlsson F, Thunblom M (2000) Analysis and direct numerical simulation of the flow at a gravity-current head. Part 2: the lobe-and-cleft instability. J Fluid Mech 418:213–229

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hacker J, Linden PF, Dalziel SB (1996) Mixing in lock-release gravity currents. Dyn Atmos Oceans 24:183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hatcher L, Hogg AJ, Woods AW (2000) The effects of drag on turbulent gravity currents. J Fluid Mech 416:297–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hopfinger EJ (1983) Snow avalanche motion and related phenomena. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 15:47–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huppert H (1982) The propagation of two-dimensional and axisymmetric viscous gravity currents over a rigid horizontal surface. J Fluid Mech 121:43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huppert H, Simpson JE (1980) The slumping of gravity currents. J Fluid Mech 99:785–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Johannesson T, Lied K, Margreth S, Sanderson F (1996) An overview of the need for avalanche protection measures in Iceland. Report prepared for the Icelandic Ministry for the Environment and local authorities in towns threatened by avalanches, Reykjavik

  26. Keller JJ, Chyou Y-P (1991) On the hydraulic lock-exchange problem. J Appl Math Phys (ZAMP) 42:874–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Keulegan GH (1957) An experimental study of the motion of saline water from locks into fresh water channels. US National Bureau of Standards Reports, Rep 5168

  28. Klemp JB, Rotunno R, Skamarock WC (1997) On the propagation of internal bores. J Fluid Mech 331:81–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Klemp JB, Rotunno R, Skamarock WC (1994) On the dynamics of gravity currents in a channel. J Fluid Mech 331:169–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kneller B, Bennett SJ, McCaffrey WD (1999) Velocity structure, turbulence and fluid stresses in experimental gravity currents. J Geophys Res Oceans 104(C3):5381–5391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lightbody A, Avener M, Nepf H (2007) Observations of short-circuiting flow paths within a free-surface wetland in Augusta, Georgia, USA. Limnol Oceanogr 53(3):1040–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meiburg E, Kneller B (2010) Turbidity currents and their deposits. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 42:135–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Meyer-Peter E, Muller R (1948) Formulas for bed load transport, International Association of Hydraulic Research, 2nd Meeting. Stockholm

  34. Necker F, Härtel C, Kleiser L, Meiburg E (2002) High-resolution simulations of particle-drive gravity currents. Int J Multiph Flow 28:279–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ooi SK, Constantinescu SG, Weber L (2007) A numerical study of intrusive compositional gravity currents. Phys Fluids 19:076602. doi:10.1063/1.2750672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ooi SK, Constantinescu G, Weber LJ (2007) 2D large eddy simulation of lock-exchange gravity current flows. ASCE J Hydraul Eng 133(9):1037–1047. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:9(1037).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ooi SK, Constantinescu SG, Weber L (2009) Numerical simulations of lock exchange compositional gravity currents. J Fluid Mech 635:361–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ozgokmen TM, Fischer PF, Duan J, Iliescu T (2004) Entrainment in bottom gravity currents over complex topography from three-dimensional nonhydrostatic simulations. Geophys Res Lett 31:L13212. doi:10.1029/2004GL0200186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Patterson MD, Simpson JE, Dalziel SB, van Heijst GJF (2006) Vortical motion in the head of axisymmetric gravity current. Phys Fluids 18:046601(1–7)

  40. Pierce CD, Moin P (2001) Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Mech. Eng. Dept. Rep. TF-80. Stanford University, California

  41. Pierce CD, Moin P (2004) Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion. J Fluid Mech 504:73–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rottman JW, Simpson JE (1983) Gravity currents produced by instantaneous releases of a heavy fluid in a rectangular channel. J Fluid Mech 135:95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shin J, Dalziel S, Linden PF (2004) Gravity currents produced by lock exchange. J Fluid Mech 521:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Simpson JE (1997) Gravity currents: in the environment and the laboratory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stacey MW, Bowen AJ (1988) The vertical structure of turbidity currents and a necessary condition for self-maintenance. J Geophys Res 94(C4):3543–3553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sutherland BR, Kyba PJ, Flynn MR (2004) Intrusive gravity currents in two-layer fluids. J Fluid Mech 514:327–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tan WA, Nobes DS, Fleck BA, Flynn MR (2011) Gravity currents in two-layer stratified media. Environ Fluid Mech 11(2):203–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tanino Y, Nepf HM, Kulis PS (2005) Gravity currents in aquatic canopies. Water Resour Res 41:W12402

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tokyay T, Constantinescu G, Meiburg E (2011) Lock exchange gravity currents with a high volume of release propagating over an array of obstacles. J Fluid Mech 672:570–605

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tokyay T, Constantinescu G, Gonzales-Juez E, Meiburg E (2011) Gravity currents propagating over periodic arrays of blunt obstacles: effect of the obstacle size. J Fluids Struct 27:798–806

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tokyay T, Constantinescu G, Meiburg E (2012) Tail structure and bed friction velocity distribution of gravity currents propagating over an array of obstacles. J Fluid Mech 694:252–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ungarish M (2005) Intrusive gravity currents in a stratified ambient—shallow-water theory and numerical results. J Fluid Mech 535:287–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ungarish M (2009) An introduction to gravity currents and intrusions. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, London

  54. Ungarish M, Huppert HE (2008) Energy balances for axisymmetric gravity currents in homogeneous and linearly stratified ambients. J Fluid Mech 616:303–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. van Rijn LC (1984) Sediment transport, Part I: bed load transport. J Hydraul Eng 110(10):1431–1456

    Google Scholar 

  56. van Rijn LC (1984) Sediment pick-up functions. J Hydraul Eng 110(10):1494–1503

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zedler E, Street R (2006) Sediment transport over ripples in oscillatory flow. J Hydraul Eng 132(2):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Yuksel-Ozan A, Constantinescu G, Nepf H (2012) An LES study of exchange flow between open water and a region containing a vegetated surface layer. In: 3rd International symposium on shallow flows, Iowa City

  59. Zhang X, Nepf H (2011) Exchange flow between open water and floating vegetation. Environ Fluid Mech. doi:10.1007/s10652-011-9213-4

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is based in great part on the research performed by Dr. S.K. Ooi, Dr. T. Tokyay and Dr. A. Yuksel Ozan. Part of the research was conducted in collaboration with Prof. E. Meiburg and Prof. H. Nepf.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanley Hydraulics Laboratory, Civil & Environmental Engineering, IIHR-Hydroscience and Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA

    George Constantinescu

Authors
  1. George Constantinescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Constantinescu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Constantinescu, G. LES of lock-exchange compositional gravity currents: a brief review of some recent results. Environ Fluid Mech 14, 295–317 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9289-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9289-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation