Skip to main content
Log in

A simplified computational analysis of turbulent plumes and jets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), particularly Large Eddy Simulation, for the modelling of buoyant turbulent plumes, has been demonstrated to be very accurate, but computationally expensive. Here a more basic, and therefore more generally practicable, approach is presented. Commercial CFD software is used to model such plumes using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models. A careful comparison is made between the numerical predictions and well-established results regarding the bulk properties of plumes. During this process, we are able to observe the well-known approximate Gaussian nature of the plume and achieve quantitative agreement with empirical plume spread coefficients. The use of numerical modelling allows for the investigation of the flow field and turbulence in those regions of the plume of most interest—the plume edge and near source regions. A comprehensive sensitivity study is conducted to identify the limits of applicability of this modelling approach. It is shown that the standard modelling approach of Morton, Taylor and Turner, which introduced the well-known entrainment assumption, pertains in a region well above the source region. At the plume edge, the levels of turbulence are contrasted with the value of the entrainment parameter. Finally, the effects of forcing the plumes with additional momentum at the source are considered, including the case of a pure jet. We show how these forced plumes eventually lose their momentum excess and tend to the behaviour of a pure, buoyant plume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdalla IE, Cook MJ, Hunt G (2009) Numerical study of thermal plume characteristics and entrainment in an enclosure with a point heat source. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Dyn 3(4): 608–630

    Google Scholar 

  2. ASME (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. ASME J Fluids Eng 130:078001-1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baines WD (1983) A technique for the direct measurement of volume flux of a plume. J Fluid Mech 132: 247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Saathoff P, Wang X (2008) Numerical evaluation of pollutant dispersion in the built environment: comparisons between models and experiments. J Wind Eng Ind Aero 96(10–11): 1817–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carazzo G, Kaminski E, Tait S (2006) The route to self-similarity in turbulent jets and plumes. J Fluid Mech 547: 137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu A, Kwok R, Yu K (2005) Study of pollution dispersion in urban areas using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and geographic information system (GIS). Env Model Softw 20: 273–277

    Google Scholar 

  7. Churchill S (2000) Progress in the thermal sciences: AIChE institute lecture. AIChE J 46: 1704–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Combest D, Ramachandran P, Dudukovic M (2011) On the gradient diffusion hypothesis and passive scalar transport in turbulent flows. Ind Eng Chem Res 50: 8817–8823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cook MJ, Lomas KJ (1998) Buoyancy-driven displacement flow: evaluation of two eddy viscosity turbulence models for prediction. Build Serv Eng Res Technol 19(1): 15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg U, Palaniswamy S, Batten P, Gupta V (2010) Variable turbulent Schmidt and Prandtl number modeling. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 4(4): 511–520

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gousseau P, Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, van Heist G (2011) CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion on a high-resolution grid: a case study by LES and RANS for a building group in downtown Montreal. Atmos Env 45: 428–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunt GR, Kaye NG (2001) Virtual origin correction for lazy turbulent plumes. J Fluid Mech 435: 377–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt GR, Kaye NG (2005) Lazy plumes. J Fluid Mech 533: 329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ji Y, Cook MJ, Hanby V (2007) CFD modelling of natural displacement in an enclosure connected to an atrium. Build Env 42: 1158–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaminski E, Tait S, Carazzo G (2005) Turbulent entrainment in jets with arbitrary buoyancy. J Fluid Mech 526: 361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morton BR (1968) Turbulent structure in cumulus clouds. In: International conference on cloud physics. ICCP, Toronto

  17. Morton BR, Taylor G, Turner J (1956) Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantanous sources. Proc R Soc Lond A 234: 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pospisil J, Katolicky J, Jicha M (2004) A comparison of measurements and CFD model predictions for pollutant dispersion in cities. Sci Total Env 334–335: 185–195

  19. Roache P. (1997) Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 29: 126–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rouse H, Yih C, Humphreys H (1952) Gravitational convection from a boundary source. Tellus 4: 201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scase MM, Aspden A, Caulfield C (2009) The effect of sudden source buoyancy flux increases on turbulent plumes. J Fluid Mech 635: 137–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scase MM, Caulfield CP, Dalziel SB, Hunt J (2006) Time-dependent plumes and jets with decreasing source strengths. J Fluid Mech 563: 443–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shabbir A, George W (1994) Experiments on a round turbulent buoyant plume. J Fluid Mech 275: 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shih TH, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J (1995) A new k−ε eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput Fluids 24(3): 227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Turner J (1973) Buoyancy effects in fluids. Cambridge monographs on mechanics and applied mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Hargreaves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hargreaves, D.M., Scase, M.M. & Evans, I. A simplified computational analysis of turbulent plumes and jets. Environ Fluid Mech 12, 555–578 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-012-9250-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-012-9250-7

Keywords

Navigation