Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of numerical simulations of CO2 transport in a city block with field measurements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studying urban air-transport phenomena is highly complex, because of the heterogenous flow patterns that can arise. The main reason for these is the variable topology of urban areas, however, there is a large number of influencing variables such as meteorological conditions (e.g., wind situation, temperature) and anthropogenic factors such as traffic emissions. During a one-year CO2 measurement campaign in the city of Basel, Switzerland, steep CO2 gradients were measured around a large building. The concentration differences showed a strong dependency on the local flow regimes. Analysis of the field data alone did not provide a complete explanation for the mechanisms underlying the observed phenomena. The key numerical parameters were defined and the influence of turbulent kinetic energy dependency on the time interval for the Reynolds decomposition was studied. A Reynolds-Average Navier-Stokes Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach was applied in the study area and the CO2 concentrations were simulated for six significant meteorological situations and compared to the measured data. Two flow regimes dependent on the wind situation, which either enhanced or suppressed the concentration of CO2 in the street canyon, were identified. The enhancement of CO2 in the street canyon led to a large difference in CO2 concentration between the backyard- and street-sides of a building forming the one wall of the canyon. The specific characteristics of the flow patterns led to the identification of the processes determining the observed differences in CO2 concentrations. The combined analysis of measurement and modeling showed the importance of reliable field measurements and CFD simulations with a high spatial resolution to assess transport mechanisms in urban areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andronopoulos S, Grigoriadis D, Robins A, Venetsanos A, Rafailidis S, Bartzis J (2002) Three-dimensional modelling of concentration fluctuations in complicated geometry. Environ Fluid Mech 1: 415–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ANSYS (2006) ANSYS CFX Reference Manual. ANSYS Inc., 11th edn

  3. ANSYS (2006) ANSYS ICEM CFD Reference Manual. ANSYS Inc., 11th edn

  4. Barlow J, Belcher S (2002) A wind tunnel model for quantifying fluxes in the urban boundary layer. Bound Layer Meteorol 104: 131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burrows DA, Hendricks EA, Diehl SR, Keith R (2007) Modeling turbulent flow in an urban central business district. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46(12): 2147–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coirier W, Fricker D, Furmanczyk M, Kim S (2005) A computational fluid dynamics approach for urban area transport and dispersion modeling. Environ Fluid Mech 5: 443–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson M, Snyder W, Lawson R Jr, Hunt J (1996) Wind tunnel simulations of plume dispersion through groups of obstacles. Atmos Environ 30(22): 3715–3731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Franke J, Hirsch C, Jensen AG, Krüs HW, Schatzmann M, Westbury P, Miles S, Wisse J, Wright N (2004) Recommendations on the use of CFD in predicting pedestrian wind environment. In: COST Action C14. Impact of wind and storms on city life and built environment, Working group 2—CFD techniques

  9. Grimmond C, King T, Cropley F, Nowak D, Souch C (2002) Local-scale fluxes of carbon dioxide in urban environments: methodological challenges and results from chicago. Environ Pollut 116: 243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanna SR, Brown MJ, Camelli FE, Chan ST, Coirier WJ, Hansen OR, Huber AH, Kim S, Reynolds RM (2006) Detailed simulations of atmospheric flow and dispersion in downtown Manhatten—an application of five computational fluid dynamics models. Am Meteorol Soc, pp pp 1713–1726

  11. Huang Y, Hu X, Zeng N (2009) Impact of wedge-shaped roofs on airflow and pollutant dispersion inside urban street canyons. Build Environ 44: 2335–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee I, Park H (1994) Parameterization of the pollutant transport and dispersion in urban street canyons. Atmos Environ 28(14): 2343–2349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li X, Liu C, Leung D, Lam K (2006) Recent progress in CFD modelling of wind field and pollutant transport in street canyons. Atmos Environ 40: 5640–5658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lundquist J, Chan S (2006) Consequences ofurban stability conditions for computational fluid dynamics simulations of urban dispersion. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46: 1080–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Macdonald RW, Friffiths R, Hall D (1998) A comparison of results from scaled field and wind tunnel modelling of dispersion in arrays and obstacles. Atmos Environ 32(22): 3845–3845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Menter F (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32(8): 1598–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Murena F, Favale G, Vardoulakis S, Solazzo E (2009) Modelling dispersion of traffic pollution in a deep street canyon: application of CFD and operational models. Atmos Environ 43: 2303–2311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press

  19. Richards P, Hoxey R (1993) Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-e turbulence model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 46(and 47): 145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rotach M, Vogt R, Bernhofer C, Batchvarova E, Christen A, Clappier A, Feddersen B, Gryning SE, Martucci G, Mayer H, Miteva V, Oke T, Parlow E, Richner H, Roth M, Roulet Y, Ruffieux D, Salmond J, Schatzmann M, Voogt J (2005) Bubble—an urban boundary layer meteorology project. Theor Appl Climatol 81: 231–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sini J, Anquetin S, Mestayer PG (1996) Pollutant dispersion and thermal effect in urban street canyons. Atmos Environ 30(15): 2659–2677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M, Shirasawa T (2008) Aij guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96: 1749–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai M, Chen K (2004) Measurements and three-dimensional modeling of air pollutatns dispersion in an urban street caynon. Atmos Environ 38: 5911–5924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vardoulakis S, Fisher BE, Pericleous K, Gonzalez-Flesca B (2003) Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmos Environ 37: 155–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Versteeg H, Malalasekera W (2007) An introcudtion to computational fluid dynamics. Pearson Education Limited

  26. Vogt R, Eitel J, Parlow E (2006) Coupling of backyard to street canyon CO2 concentrations. In: 6th International conference on urban climate ICUC-6, Sweden

  27. Wang X, McNamara K (2006) Evaluation of CFD simulation using RANS turbulence models for building effects on pollutant dispersion. Environ Fluid Mech 6: 181–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weber S, Weber K (2008) Coupling of urban street canyon and backyard particle concentrations. Meteorol Z 17: 251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xie Z, Castro IP (2009) Large-eddy simulation for flow and dispersion in urban streets. Atmos Environ 43: 2174–2185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andres Gartmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gartmann, A., Müller, M.D., Parlow, E. et al. Evaluation of numerical simulations of CO2 transport in a city block with field measurements. Environ Fluid Mech 12, 185–200 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-011-9226-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-011-9226-z

Keywords

Navigation