Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical and wind tunnel modeling on the windbreak effectiveness to control the aeolian erosion of conical stockpiles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many industrial sites where open aggregate conical piles exist to store granular materials, like coal, industrial residuals, or other minerals. Usually these storage piles are placed in open areas, making them susceptible to wind erosion, which can create health, environmental, and/or economical concerns. It is common to minimize the dust emission through the placement of windbreaks in the vicinity of the storage piles, which reduces the wind speed in the vicinity of the pile’s surface. In this work, some experimental results from a wind tunnel study on the erosion of a conical sand pile, exposed or protected by a fence with porosities of 0, 70, and 83%, are shown. For the sheltered cases, the windbreak was placed at several distances from the pile’s leading edge, ranging from H to 4H, where H is the initial height of the non-eroded pile. The evolution of the shape of the sand pile is shown, at different instances in time, and the pile deformation quantified, using a novel experimental setup developed for wind erosion studies. This information might be regarded as a useful dataset for the benchmark of computational models aiming to produce the transient simulation of the aeolian erosion of stockpiles. The CFD results are comprised of the modeling of several experimental scenarios. The computational results for the surface wind velocity show a good correlation with the initial deformation of the pile. Based on the results, the isocontours of (u s /u r ) presented might be regarded as a good basis for the estimation of the pile shear velocity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Park C-W, Lee S-J (2002) Verification of the shelter effect of a windbreak on coal piles in the POSCO open storage yards at the Kwang-Yang Works. Atmos Environ 36: 2171–2185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferreira AD, Viegas DX, Sousa ACM (2003) Full-scale measurements for evaluation of coal dust release from train wagons with two different shelter covers. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 91: 1271–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stunder B, Arya S (1988) Windbreak effectiveness for storage pile fugitive dust control: a wind tunnel study. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 38: 135–143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornelis WM, Gabriels D (2005) Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control. J Arid Environ 61: 315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Badr T, Harion JL (2007) Effect of aggregate storage piles configuration on dust emissions. Atmos Environ 41: 360–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Santiago JL, Martin F, Cuerva A, Bezdenejnykh N, Sanz-Andrés A (2007) Experimental and numerical study of wind flow behind windbreaks. Atmos Environ 41: 6406–6420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Toraño J, Torno S, Diego I, Menendez M, Gent M (2009) Dust emission calculations in open storage piles protected by means of barriers, CFD and experimental tests. Envir Fluid Mech 9: 493–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diego I, Pelegry A, Torno S, Toraño J, Menendez M (2009) Simultaneous CFD evaluation of wind flow and dust emission in open storage piles. Appl Math Model 33: 3197–3207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Turpin C, Harion JL (2009) Numerical modeling of flow structures over various flat-topped stockpiles height: Implications on dust emissions. Atmos Environ 43: 5579–5587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. EPA (2006) Industrial Wind Erosion (chapter 13). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch13/final/c13s0205.pdf

  11. Ghazavi M, Hosseini M, Mollanouri M (2008) A comparison between angle of repose and friction angle of sand. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference of international association for computer methods and advances in geomechanics (IACMAG), Goa, India, pp 1272–1275

  12. Bagnold RA (1941) The physics of blown sand and desert dunes. Chapman & Hall, London, p 265

    Google Scholar 

  13. White BR (1996) Laboratory simulation of aeolian sand transport and physical modeling of flow around dunes. Ann Arid Zone 35(3): 187–213

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cermak JE, Arya SPS (1970) Problems of atmospheric shear flows and their laboratory simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 1: 40–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hagen LJ (1999) Assessment of wind erosion parameters using wind tunnels. In: Stott DE, Mohtar RH, Steinhardt GA (eds) Sustaining the global farm, proceedings of 10th international soil conservation organization conference, 24–29 May 1999, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, pp 742–746

  16. Ferreira AD, Oliveira RA (2009) Wind erosion of sand placed inside a rectangular box. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 97: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dimetix http://www.dimetix.com

  18. CFX (2008) http://www.ansys.com/products/fluid-dynamics/cfx

  19. Lancaster N (1995) Geomorphology of desert dunes. Routledge, London, p 244

    Google Scholar 

  20. Durán O, Herrmann H (2006) Modelling of saturated sand flux. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2006/07/P07011

  21. Wang H, Takle ES, Shen J (2001) Shelterbelts and windbreaks: mathematical modeling and computer simulations of turbulent flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 22: 549–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee S-J, Kim H-B (1999) Laboratory measurements of velocity and turbulence field behind porous fences. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 80: 311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong Z, Liu X, Wang H, Wang X (2003) Aeolian sand transport: a wind tunnel model. Sediment Geol 161: 71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pye K, Tsoar H (2009) Aeolian sand and sand dunes. Springer, Berlin, p 458

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson JD (1987) On the choice of a windbreak porosity profile. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 38: 37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Almerindo D. Ferreira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferreira, A.D., Lambert, R.J. Numerical and wind tunnel modeling on the windbreak effectiveness to control the aeolian erosion of conical stockpiles. Environ Fluid Mech 11, 61–76 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-010-9176-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-010-9176-x

Keywords

Navigation