Insights on plant interaction between dominating species from patterns of plant association: expected covariance of pin-point cover measurements of two species
- 182 Downloads
It has been suggested that in order to infer ecological processes from observed patterns of species abundance we need to investigate the covariance in species abundance. Consequently, an expression for the expected covariance of pin-point cover measurements of two species is developed. By comparing the observed covariance with the expected covariance we get a new type of information on the spatial arrangement of two species. Here the discrepancy between the observed and expected covariance may be thought of as a measure of the spatial configuration of the two species that may indicate underling ecological processes. The method is applied in a case study of Calluna vulgaris and Deschampsia flexuosa on dry heathland sites. The observed covariance of Calluna and Deschampsia at the level of the sites was positively and significantly correlated with the expected covariance. Negative covariance was observed on sites where both Calluna and Deschampsia had a high cover, which is in agreement with the notion that both species form distinct patches. Oppositely, at sites where both species have a low cover, we found that both the expected and observed covariance were positive. The proposed measure for the expected covariance of two species does capture information on the combined spatial configuration of the two species if the species are common. We show how this may be relevant for understanding the underlying ecological processes leading to the observed covariance.
KeywordsCovariance Distribution of plant abundance Ecological processes Pin-point cover Plant associations Spatial dynamics
Thanks to Professor Norm Kenkel for most valuable comments on a previous version of the manuscript.
- Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 342–444Google Scholar
- Heil G W (ed) (1986) Removal and fertililizer exprimens in heathland concerning the species Calluna vulgaris (L. Hull) Deschampsia flexuosa (L. Trin.) and Molinia caerulea (L. Moench), Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Interpretation manual of European Union habitats. Natura, (2000) European Commission. European Commission, DG Environment, Nature and Biodiversity, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
- Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis. Belhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Lindquist B (1931) Den skandinaviska bokskogens biologi. Svenska Skogsvårdsföeningens Tidskrift, 3Google Scholar
- Nielsen KE, Bak JL, Bruus M et al (2012) NATURDATA. DK - Danish monitoring program of vegetation and chemical plant and soil data from non-forested terrestrial habitat types. Biodiversity Ecol 4:375Google Scholar
- Pacala S, Levin SA (1997) Biological generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species. In: Tilman D, Kareiva P (eds) Spatial ecology. The role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 204–232Google Scholar
- Rodwell JS (ed) (1991) British plant communities-Mires and heaths. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Wolfram S (2013) Mathematica. Wolfram Research Inc, ChampaignGoogle Scholar