Skip to main content

A generalized estimating equations approach for capture–recapture closed population models

Abstract

The estimation of population density animal population parameters, such as capture probability, population size, or population density, is an important issue in many ecological applications. Capture–recapture data may be considered as repeated observations that are often correlated over time. If these correlations are not taken into account then parameter estimates may be biased, possibly producing misleading results. We propose a generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach to account for correlation over time instead of assuming independence as in the traditional closed population capture–recapture studies. We also account for heterogeneity among observed individuals and over-dispersion, modelling capture probabilities as a function of covariates. The GEE versions of all closed population capture–recapture models and their corresponding estimating equations are proposed. We evaluate the effect of accounting for correlation structures on capture–recapture model selection based on the quasi-likelihood information criterion (QIC). An example is used for an illustrative application and for comparison to currently used methodology. A Horvitz–Thompson-like estimator is used to obtain estimates of population size based on conditional arguments. A simulation study is conducted to evaluate the performance of the GEE approach in capture-recapture studies. The GEE approach performs well for estimating population parameters, particularly when capture probabilities are high. The simulation results also reveal that estimated population size varies on the nature of the existing correlation among capture occasions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Ebrahimi N (2001) Bayesian capture–recapture methods for error detection and estimation of population size: heterogeneity and dependence. Biometrika 88:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers E, Lewis K, McCue T, Westley P (2008) Generalized linear models: model selection, diagnostics, and overdispersion. Memorial University of Newfoundland. http://www.mun.ca/biology/dschneider/b7932/B7932Final4Mar2008.pdf. Accessed 13 April 2013

  • Castledine B (1981) A Bayesian analysis of multiple-recapture sampling for a closed population. Biometrika 46:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Huggins RM (2005) Modern closed-population capture-recapture models. In: Amstrup C, McDonald TL, Manly BFJ (eds) Handbook of capture-recapture analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 58–87

  • Cox DR (1970) Analysis of binary data. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui J (2007) QIC program and model selection in GEE analyses. Stata J 7:209–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson AJ (2010) An introduction to generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • George E, Robert C (1992) Capture–recapture sampling via gibbs sampling. Biometrika 79:677–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh SK, Norris J (2005) Bayesian capture–recapture analysis of a closed population allowing for heterogeneity between animals. J Agri Biol Environ Stat 10:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosky R, Ghosh SK (2009) A comparative study of Bayesian model selection criteria for capture–recapture models for closed populations. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 9:68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosky R, Ghosh SK (2011) A comparative study of Bayes estimators of closed population size from capture–recapture data. J Stat Theory Pract 5:241–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Redfield JA, Krebs CJ (1976) On the reliability of enumeration for mark and recapture census of voles. Can J Zool 54:1019–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojsgaard S, Halekoh U (2005) Overdispersion. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Copenhagen. http://gbi.agrsci.dk/statistics/courses. Accessed 13 April 2013

  • Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ (1952) A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Am Stat Assoc 47:663–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins RM (1989) On the statistical analysis of capture experiments. Biometrika 76:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins RM (1991) Some practical aspects of a conditional likelihood approach to capture experiments. Biometrics 47:725–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins RM, Yip PS (2001) A note on nonparametric inference for capture–recapture experiments with heterogeneous capture probabilities. Stat Sinica 11:843–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang WH, Huggins RM (2005) An examination of the effect of heterogeneity on the estimation of population size using capture–recapture data. Biometrika 92:229–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang WH, Huggins RM (2007) Application of semiparametric regression models in the analysis of capture–recapture experiments. Aust NZ J Stat 49:191–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King R, Brooks SP (2008) Bayesian estimation of a closed population size in the presence of heterogeneity and model uncertainty. Biometrics 64:816–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SM, Hwang WH, Huang LH (2003) Bayes estimation of population size from capture–recapture models with time variation and behavior response. Stat Sinica 13:477–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madigan D, York JC (1997) Bayesian methods for estimation of the size of a closed population. Biometrika 84:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder JA, Wedderburn RWM (1972) Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser A 135:370–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD (1986) On the use of enumeration estimators for interspecific comparisons, with comments on a “trappability” estimator. J Mammal 67:590–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD, Pollock KH (1983) Estimation methodology in contemporary small mammal capture–recapture studies. J Mammal 64:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC, Anderson DR (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildl Monogr 62:1–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan W (2001) Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics 57:120–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock K, Hines J, Nichols J (1984) The use of auxiliary variables in capture–recapture and removal experiments. Biometrics 40:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qaqish BF (2003) A family of multivariate binary distributions for simulating correlated binary variables with specified marginal means and correlations. Biometrika 90:455–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/

  • Seber GAF (1986) A review of estimating animal abundance. Biometrics 42:267–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1992) A review of estimating animal abundance II. Int Stat Rev 60:129–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (2002) The Estimation of animal abundance and related parameters, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp (2010) Stata statistical software: Release 11. StataCorp, College Station, TX

  • Smith P (1991) Bayesian analyses for a multiple capture–recapture model. Biometrika 78:99–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn RWM (1974) Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized liner models, and the Gauss–Newton method. Biometrika 61:439–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ (2002) Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeger SL, Liang KY (1986) Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 42:121–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S (2012) A GEE approach for estimating size of hard-to-reach population by using capture recapture data. Statistics 46(2):175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by EMMA in the framework of the EU Erasmus Mundus Action 2 and FCT, Portugal under the Project PEst-OE/MAT/UI0117/2011. The authors would like to thank ISEC-2012 conference organizing committee for giving opportunity to collect valuable suggestions on this manuscript. The authors are very grateful to two referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and several helpful suggestions that considerably improved the presentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Abdus Salam Akanda.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Ashis SenGupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akanda, M.A.S., Alpizar-Jara, R. A generalized estimating equations approach for capture–recapture closed population models. Environ Ecol Stat 21, 667–688 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-014-0274-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-014-0274-7

Keywords