A robust design capture-recapture model with multiple age classes augmented with population assignment data
The relative contribution of in situ reproduction versus immigration to the recruitment process is important to ecologists. Here we consider a robust design superpopulation capture-recapture model for a population with two age classes augmented with population assignment data. We first use age information to estimate the entry probabilities of new animals originating via in situ reproduction and immigration separately for all except the first period. Then we combine age and population assignment information with the capture-recapture model, which enables us to estimate the entry probability of in situ births and the entry probability of immigrants separately for all sampling periods. Further, this augmentation of age specific capture-recapture data with population assignment data greatly improves the estimators’ precision. We apply our new model to a capture-recapture data set with genetic information for banner-tailed kangaroo rats in Southern Arizona. We find that many more individuals are born in situ than are immigrants for all time periods. Young animals have lower survival probabilities than adults born in situ. Adult animals born in situ have higher survival probabilities than adults that were immigrants.
KeywordsCapture-recapture Genetic assignment procedures Kangaroo rat Robust design Single site Superpopulation Two age groups
We thank the NSF, for support (DEB 0816925).
- Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
- Hobson KA (1999) Tracing origins and migration of wildlife using stable isotopes: a review. Oecologia 120:324–326Google Scholar
- Kendall WL, Pollock KH (1992) The robust design in capture-recapture studies: a review and evaluation by Monte Carlo simulation. In: McCullough DR, Barrett RH (eds) Wildlife 2001: populations. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Kendall WL, Nichols JD, Hines JE (1997) Estimating temporary emigration using capture-recapture data with Pollock’s robust design. Ecology 78:563–578Google Scholar
- Manel S, Gaggiotti OE, Waples RS (2005) Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends Ecol Evol 20:136–142Google Scholar
- Moilanen A, Wilson KA (2009) Spatial conservation prioritization. Oxford University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
- Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Brownie C, Hines JE (1990) Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildl MonogrGoogle Scholar
- Seber GAF (1965) A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259Google Scholar
- Seber GAF (1982) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters, 2nd edn. Charles Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar