Advertisement

Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 573–599 | Cite as

Comparing CAR and P-spline models in spatial disease mapping

  • T. Goicoa
  • M. D. UgarteEmail author
  • J. Etxeberria
  • A. F. Militino
Article

Abstract

Smoothing risks is one of the main goals in disease mapping as classical measures, such as standardized mortality ratios, can be extremely variable. However, smoothing risks might hinder the detection of high risk areas, since these two objectives are somewhat contradictory. Most of the work on smoothing risks and detection of high risk areas has been derived using conditional autoregressive (CAR) models. In this work, penalized splines (P-splines) models are also investigated. Confidence intervals for the log-relative risk predictor will be derived as a tool to detect high-risk areas. The performance of P-spline and CAR models will be compared in terms of smoothing (relative bias), sensitivity (ability to detect high risk areas), and specificity (ability to discard false patterns created by noise) through a simulation study based on the well-known Scottish lip cancer data.

Keywords

PRIDE model Smoothing risks Simulation study MSE PQL Lip cancer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Besag J (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussions). J R Stat Soc Ser B 36: 192–236Google Scholar
  2. Besag J, York J, Mollié A (1991) Bayesian image restoration with two applications in spatial statistics. Ann Inst Stat Math 43: 1–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breslow NE, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88: 9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clayton DG, Kaldor J (1987) Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. Biometrics 43: 671–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Currie ID, Durbán M, Eilers PH (2004) Smoothing and forecasting mortality rates. Stat Model 4: 279–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dean CB, Ugarte MD, Militino AF (2001) Detecting interaction between random region and fixed age effects in disease mapping. Biometrics 57: 197–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dean CB, Ugarte MD, Militino AF (2004) Penalized quasi-likelihood with spatially correlated data. Comput Stat Data Anal 45: 235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eilers PHC, Marx BD (1996) Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. Stat Sci 11: 89–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eilers PHC, Currie ID, Durbán M (2006) Fast and compact smoothing on large multidimensional grids. Comput Stat Data Anal 50: 61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harville DA (1977) Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. J Am Stat Assoc 72: 320–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawson AB (2009) Bayesian disease mapping. Hierarchical modelling in spatial epidemiology. Chapman and Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee D-J, Durbán M (2009) Smooth-CAR mixed models for spatial count data. Comput Stat Data Anal 53: 2968–2979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leroux BG, Lei X, Breslow N (1999) Estimation of disease rates in small areas: a new mixed model for spatial dependence. In: Halloran ME, Berry D (eds) Statistical models in epidemiology, the environment and clinical trials. Springer, New York, NY, pp 179–192Google Scholar
  14. Liang F, Lui C, Carroll RJ (2010) Advanced Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin X (2007) Estimation using penalized quasilikelihood and quasi-pseudo-likelihood in Poisson mixed models. Lifetime Data Anal 13: 533–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacNab YC (2003) Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of spatially correlated health service outcome and utilization of rates. Biometrics 59: 305–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacNab YC, Dean CB (2000) Parametric bootstrap and penalized quasi-likelihood inference in conditional autoregressive models. Stat Med 19: 2421–2435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacNab YC, Dean CB (2001) Autoregressive spatial smoothing and temporal spline smoothing for mapping rates. Biometrics 57: 949–956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MacNab YC, Gustafson P (2007) Regression B-spline smoothing in Bayesian disease mapping: with an application to patient safety surveillance. Stat Med 26: 4455–4474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacNab YC, Farrel PJ, Gustafson P, Wen S (2004) Estimation in Bayesian disease mapping. Biometrics 60: 865–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacNab YC, Kmetic A, Gustafson P, Sheps S (2006) An innovative application of Bayesian disease mapping methods to patient safety research: a Canadian adverse medical event study. Stat Med 25: 3960–3980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Militino AF, Ugarte MD, Dean CB (2001) The use of mixture models for identifying high risks in disease mapping. Stat Med 20: 2035–2049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Opsomer JD, Claeskens G, Ranalli MG, Kauermann G, Breidt FJ (2008) Non-parametric small area estimation using penalized spline regression. J R Stat Soc B 70: 265–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Perperoglou A, Eilers PH (2010) Penalized regression with individual deviance effects. Comput Stat 25: 341–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/
  26. Richardson S, Thomson A, Best N, Elliot P (2004) Interpreting posterior relative risk estimates in disease-mapping studies. Environ Health Perspect 112: 1016–1025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richardson S, Abellán JJ, Best N (2006) Bayesian spatio-temporal analysis of joint patterns of male and female lung cancer risks in Yorkshire. Stat Methods Med Res 15: 385–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruppert D (2002) Selecting the number of knots for penalized splines. J Comput Graph Stat 11: 735–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schall R (1991) Estimation in generalized linear models with random effects. Biometrika 78: 719–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best NG, Lunn DJ (2003) WinBUGS version 1.4 user’s manual. MRC Biostatiscs unit. Institute of Public Health, Cambridge; Rolf Nevanlinna Institute, University of Helsinki; and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London. http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs
  31. Tango T (2010) Statistical methods for disease clustering. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ugarte MD, Ibáñez B, Militino AF (2005) Detection of spatial variation in risk when using CAR models for smoothing relative risks. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19: 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ugarte MD, Militino AF, Goicoa T (2008) Prediction error estimators in empirical Bayes disease mapping. Environmetrics 19: 287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ugarte MD, Goicoa T, Militino AF (2009a) Empirical Bayes and fully Bayes procedures to detect high-risk areas in disease mapping. Comput Stat Data Anal 53: 2938–2949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ugarte MD, Goicoa T, Ibáñez B, Militino AF (2009b) Evaluating the performance of spatio-temporal Bayesian models in disease mapping. Environmetrics 20: 647–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wakefield J (2007) Disease mapping and spatial regression with count data. Biostatistics 8: 158–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waller LA, Gotway CA (2004) Applied spatial statistics for public health data. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Goicoa
    • 1
  • M. D. Ugarte
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Etxeberria
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. F. Militino
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Estadística e Investigación OperativaUniversidad Pública de NavarraPamplonaSpain
  2. 2.CIBER of Epidemiology and public Health (CIBERESP)PamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations