Skip to main content
Log in

Accounting for rate instability and spatial patterns in the boundary analysis of cancer mortality maps

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Boundary analysis of cancer maps may highlight areas where causative exposures change through geographic space, the presence of local populations with distinct cancer incidences, or the impact of different cancer control methods. Too often, such analysis ignores the spatial pattern of incidence or mortality rates and overlooks the fact that rates computed from sparsely populated geographic entities can be very unreliable. This paper proposes a new methodology that accounts for the uncertainty and spatial correlation of rate data in the detection of significant edges between adjacent entities or polygons. Poisson kriging is first used to estimate the risk value and the associated standard error within each polygon, accounting for the population size and the risk semivariogram computed from raw rates. The boundary statistic is then defined as half the absolute difference between kriged risks. Its reference distribution, under the null hypothesis of no boundary, is derived through the generation of multiple realizations of the spatial distribution of cancer risk values. This paper presents three types of neutral models generated using methods of increasing complexity: the common random shuffle of estimated risk values, a spatial re-ordering of these risks, or p-field simulation that accounts for the population size within each polygon. The approach is illustrated using age-adjusted pancreatic cancer mortality rates for white females in 295 US counties of the Northeast (1970–1994). Simulation studies demonstrate that Poisson kriging yields more accurate estimates of the cancer risk and how its value changes between polygons (i.e., boundary statistic), relatively to the use of raw rates or local empirical Bayes smoother. When used in conjunction with spatial neutral models generated by p-field simulation, the boundary analysis based on Poisson kriging estimates minimizes the proportion of type I errors (i.e., edges wrongly declared significant) while the frequency of these errors is predicted well by the p-value of the statistical test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Best N, Richardson S and Thomson A (2005). A comparison of Bayesian spatial models for disease mapping. Stat Methods Med Res 14: 35–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DG and Kaldor J (1987). Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. Biometrics 43: 671–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (2001). Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science. Geoderma 103: 3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (2005). Geostatistical analysis of disease data: estimation of cancer mortality risk from empirical frequencies using Poisson kriging. Int J Health Geogr 4: 31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (2006). Geostatistical analysis of disease data: visualization and propagation of spatial uncertainty in cancer mortality risk using Poisson kriging and p-field simulation. Int J Health Geogr 5: 7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P and Jacquez GM (2004). Accounting for regional background and population size in the detection of spatial clusters and outliers using geostatistical filtering and spatial neutral models: the case of lung cancer in Long Island, New York. Int J Health Geogr 3: 14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquez G (1998). GIS as an enabling technology. In: Gatrell, A and Loytonen, M (eds) GIS and health, pp 17–28. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquez GM and Greiling DA (2003). Geographic boundaries in breast, lung and colorectal cancers in relation to exposure to air toxics in Long Island, New York. Int J Health Geogr 2: 4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H and Carlin BP (2005). Bayesian areal wombling for geographical boundary analysis. Geogr Anal 37: 265–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monestiez P, Dubroca L, Bonnin E, Durbec JP and Guinet C (2006). Geostatistical modelling of spatial distribution of Balenoptera physalus in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea from sparse count data and heterogeneous observation efforts. Ecol Model 193: 615–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mungiole M, Pickle LW and Hansen Simonson K (1999). Application of a weighted head-banging algorithm to mortality data maps. Stat Med 18: 3201–3209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oden NL, Sokal RR, Fortin M-J and Goebl H (1993). Categorical wombling: detecting regions of significant change in spatially located categorical variables. Geogr Anal 25: 315–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo-Iguzquiza E (1999). VARFIT: a Fortran-77 program for fitting variogram models by weighted least squares. Comput Geosci 25: 251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickle LW, Mungiole M, Jones GK and White AA (1999). Exploring spatial patterns of mortality: the new Atlas of United States mortality. Stat Med 18: 3211–3220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton G, Elmes G and McMaster R (2000). Considerations for improving geographic information system research in public health. J Urban Regional Inform Syst Assoc 12: 31–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets JA (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285–1293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waller LA and Gotway CA (2004). Applied spatial statistics for public health data. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Womble W (1951). Differential systematics. Science 114: 315–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Goovaerts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goovaerts, P. Accounting for rate instability and spatial patterns in the boundary analysis of cancer mortality maps. Environ Ecol Stat 15, 421–446 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0064-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0064-6

Keywords

Navigation