Skip to main content
Log in

Testing homogeneity of capture probabilities of animals in a removal experiment

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider the removal experiment used to estimate population sizes. Statistical methods towards testing the homogeneity of capture probabilities of animals, including a graphical diagnostic and a formal test, are presented and illustrated by real biological examples. Simulation is used to assess the test and compare it with the χ2 test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borchers DL, Buckland ST and Zucchini W (2002). Estimating animal abundance. Springer-Verlag, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Goudie IBJ and Borchers DL (2000). Widelife population assessment: past developments and future directions. Biometrics 56: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carle FL and Strub MR (1978). A new method for estimating population size from removal data. Biometrics 34: 621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SM and Chao A (1994). Estimating population size via sample coverage for closed capture–recapture models. Biometrics 50: 88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay BG (1995) Mixture models: theory, geometry and applications. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, California

  • Lindsay BG and Roeder K (1992). Residual diagnotics for mixture models. J Am Stat Assoc 87: 785–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao CX (2004). Prediction the conditional probability of discovering a new class. J Am Stat Assoc 99: 1108–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao CX and Lindsay BG (2002). Diagnostics for the heterogeneity of inclusion probabilities in a Bernoulli census. Indian J Stat 64: 763–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao CX and Lindsay BG (2003). Tests and diagnostics for heterogeneity for the species problem. Comput Statist Data Anal 41: 389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran PAP (1951). A mathematical theory of animal trapping. Biometrika 38: 307–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman J and Scott EL (1966). On the use of C(α) optimal tests of composite hypothesis. Bulletin de l’Institut International de Statistique 41(I): 477–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris JLI and Pollock KH (1996). Nonparametric MLE under two closed capture–recapture models with heterogeneity. Biometrics 52: 639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC and Anderson DR (1978). Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildl Monogr 62: 1–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricker WE (1975). Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull Fishe Aquat Board Canada 191: 1–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz CJ and Seber GAF (1999). A review of estimating animal abundance III. Stat Sci 14: 427–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YG (1999). Estimating equations for removed data analysis. Biometrics 55: 1263–1268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zippin C (1956). An evaluation of the removal method of estimating animal populations. Biometrics 12: 163–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Xuan Mao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mao, C.X. Testing homogeneity of capture probabilities of animals in a removal experiment. Environ Ecol Stat 14, 473–481 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0054-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0054-8

Keywords

Navigation