Spatial methods for plot-based sampling of wildlife populations

Abstract

Classical sampling methods can be used to estimate the mean of a finite or infinite population. Block kriging also estimates the mean, but of an infinite population in a continuous spatial domain. In this paper, I consider a finite population version of block kriging (FPBK) for plot-based sampling. The data are assumed to come from a spatial stochastic process. Minimizing mean-squared-prediction errors yields best linear unbiased predictions that are a finite population version of block kriging. FPBK has versions comparable to simple random sampling and stratified sampling, and includes the general linear model. This method has been tested for several years for moose surveys in Alaska, and an example is given where results are compared to stratified random sampling. In general, assuming a spatial model gives three main advantages over classical sampling: (1) FPBK is usually more precise than simple or stratified random sampling, (2) FPBK allows small area estimation, and (3) FPBK allows nonrandom sampling designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bolfarine H and Zacks S (1992). Prediction theory for finite populations. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 207

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cressie N (1993). Statistics for spatial data, Revised edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 900

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fay R and Harriot R (1979). Estimates of income for small places: an application of James-Stein procedures to census data. J Am Stat Assoc 74: 269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gasaway WC, DuBois SD, Reed DJ, Harbo SJ (1986) Estimating moose population parameters from aerial surveys. Biological Papers of the University of Alaska, vol 22, p108

  5. Ghosh M and Meeden G (1986). Empirical Bayes estimation in finite population sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 81: 1058–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Patterson HD and Thompson R (1971). Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patterson HD, Thompson R (1974) Maximum likelihood estimation of components of variance. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Biometric Conference, Biometric Society, Washington, DC, pp 197–207

  8. Prasad NGN and Rao JNK (1990). On the estimation of mean square error of small area predictors. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stein ML (1999). Interpolation of spatial data: some theory for Kriging. Springer, New York, p 247

    Google Scholar 

  10. Olsen AR and Stevens DL (2004). Spatially-balanced sampling of natural resources. J Am Stat Assoc 99: 262–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson S (1992). Sampling. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 343

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ver Hoef JM (2002). Sampling and geostatistics for spatial data. Ecoscience 9: 152–161

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay M. Ver Hoef.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ver Hoef, J.M. Spatial methods for plot-based sampling of wildlife populations. Environ Ecol Stat 15, 3–13 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0035-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Geostatistics
  • Variogram
  • Block kriging
  • Finite population
  • BLUP
  • Small area