Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of the density of a clustered point pattern using a distance method

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distance-based methods use point-to-point distances or random-location-to-point distances in a cloud of points to estimate characteristics of the point pattern. One such characteristics is the density of points. The difficulty with distance-based density estimators is that their distribution depends on the spatial pattern of points. In particular, the distribution of distances is untractable for usual clustered patterns, that are often observed in natural systems. Here, we propose a density estimator for clustered patterns, based on the random-location-to-pth-point distance X p . An approximate expression for the distribution function, F p , of X p was obtained by identifying the first two moments of the count of individuals in disks for a given point process with the first two moments of a negative binomial distribution. The approximate expression of F p was then used to derive a maximum-likelihood estimator of the intensity of the point process. The quality of the approximation of F p was assessed for homogeneous Poisson processes (for which the expression of F p is exact) and for Matérn processes. The intensity estimator based on Matérn processes was then used to estimate tree density in a tree savanna in Mali, and it compared favorably with six robust estimators found in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1964) Handbook of mathematical functions (with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables). US Government Printing Office, Washington

  • Brix A (1999). Generalized gamma measures and shot-noise Cox processes. Adv Appl Probab 31: 929–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brix A and Chadoeuf J (2002). Spatio-temporal modelling of weeds by shot-noise G Cox processes. Biom J 44: 83–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP and Laake JL (1993). Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Byth K (1982). On robust distance-based intensity estimators. Biometrics 38: 127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton G and Cox TF (1986). Some robust density estimators for spatial point processes. Biometrics 42: 753–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1991). Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ (1975). Robust density estimation using distance methods. Biometrika 62: 39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ (1977). A note on robust density estimation for spatial point patterns. Biometrika 64: 91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt LL (1967). Some developments in distance sampling. Biometrics 23: 207–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engeman RM, Sugihara RT, Pank LF and Dusenberry WE (1994). A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation. Ecology 75: 1769–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir L and Tutz G (2001). Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models, 2 edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Holgate P (1964). The efficiency of nearest neighbour estimators. Biometrics 20: 647–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holgate P (1965). The distance from a random point to the nearest point of a closely packed lattice. Biometrika 52: 261–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard CV and Reed MG (1998). Unbiased stereology: three-dimensional measurement in microscopy. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuls M, Over HJ and Wit CT (1963). The distance method for estimating densities. Stat Neerl 17: 71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessard VC, Drummer TD, Reed DD (2002) Precision of density estimates from fixed-radius plots compared to n-tree distance sampling. For Sci 48:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis SM (1975). Robust estimation of density for a two-dimensional point process. Biometrika 62: 519–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez VJ and Saar E (2002). Statistics of the galaxy distribution. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller J and Waagepetersen RP (2004). Statistical inference and simulation for spatial point processes. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PG (1954). Spacing in plant populations. Ecology 35: 222–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morisita M (1954). Estimation of population density by spacing method. Mem Fac Sci Kyushu Univ Ser E 1: 187–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelder JA and Mead R (1965). A simplex algorithm for function minimization. Comput J 7: 308–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil SA, Burnham KP and Kovner JL (1979). Non-parametric estimation of plant density by the distance method. Biometrics 35: 597–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil SA, Kovner JL and Burnham KP (1982). Optimum non-parametric estimation of population density based on ordered distances. Biometrics 38: 243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson O (1964). Distance methods. The use of distance measurements in the estimation of seedling density and open space frequency. Stud Forestalia Suec 15: 1–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson O (1971). The robustness of estimating density by distance measurements. In: Patil, GP, Pielou, EC and Waters, WE (eds) Statistical ecology: sampling and modeling biological populations and population dynamics., pp 175–190. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard N, Kouyaté AM and Dessard H (2005). Tree density estimations using a distance method in mali savanna. For Sci 51: 7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard JH (1971). On distance estimators of density in randomly distributed forests. Biometrics 27: 991–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2003) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Ramsey FL and Harrison K (2004). A closer look at detectability. Environ Ecol Stat 11: 73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheil D, Ducey MJ, Sidiyasa K and Samsoedin I (2003). A new type of sample unit for the efficient assessment of diverse tree communities in complex forest landscapes. J Trop For Sci 15: 117–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiver BD and Borders BE (1996). Sampling techniques for forest ressource inventory. Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan D and Penttinen A (2000). Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics. Stat Sci 15: 61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan D and Stoyan H (1994). Fractals, random shapes and point fields. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson HR (1956). Distribution of distance to nth neighbour in a population of randomly distributed individuals. Ecology 37: 391–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert RL and Ickstadt K (1998). Poisson/gamma random field models for spatial statistics. Biometrika 85: 251–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Picard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Picard, N., Bar-Hen, A. Estimation of the density of a clustered point pattern using a distance method. Environ Ecol Stat 14, 341–353 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0024-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0024-1

Keywords

Navigation