Skip to main content

Optimal spatial sampling schemes for environmental surveys

Abstract

A practical problem in spatial statistics is that of constructing spatial sampling designs for environmental monitoring network. This paper presents a fractal-based criterion for the construction of coverage designs to optimize the location of sampling points. The algorithm does not depend on the covariance structure of the process and provides desirable results for situations in which a poor prior knowledge is available. The statistical characteristics of the method are explored by a simulation study while a design exercise concerning the Pescara area monitoring network is used to demonstrate potential designs under realistic assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Aarts, E. and Korst, J. (1990)Simulated Annealing and Boltzmann Machines-A stochastic Approach to Combinatorial Optimization and Neural Computing, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Battista, T. and Ippoliti, L. (1999)A spatial model building strategy. Journal of the Italian Statistical Society, 8, 2, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakos, G. and Olea, R. A. (1992)Sampling design for spatially distributed hydrogeologic and environmental processes. Advances Water Resources, 15, 219-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Zio, S., Fontanella, L., and Ippoliti, L. (2002)Fractal Geometry For Optimal Spatial Sampling Designs. LASR Conference 2002. STATISTICS OF LARGE DATASETS. Functional and Image Data, Bioinformatics and Data Mining, University of Leeds, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, A. C., Bailey, C. T., Diggle, P. J., and Rowlingson, B. S. (1996)Spatial point pattern analysis and its application in geographical epidemiology. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. NS 21 256-274 1996, ISSN 0020-2754, Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, L. and Lucas, D. (1982)Spatial data processing using balanced ternary. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Processing. IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Springs, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P. (2000)Estimation on simulation of soil properties?On optimisation problem with conflicting criteria. Geoderma, 97 (3), 165-186 (22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, H. M. and Sugihara, G. (1993)Fractals:A user 's Guide for the Natural Sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagadish, H. V. (1990)Linear clustering of objects with multiple attributes. SIGMOD Conference, 332-42.

  • Lark, R. M. (2002)Optimized spatial sampling of soil for estimation of the variogram by maximum likelihood. Geoderma., 105, 49-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982)The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D. M. (1990)Neighbor-based properties of some orderings of two-dimensional space. Geographical Analysis, 2, 145-57

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. J., Di Battista, T., Ippoliti, L., and Nissi, E. (2000)A Point Source Model for Spatial Data. Technical Report STAT. 503/2000, Sheffield University.

  • Mate ´rn, B. (1960)Spatial variation. Meddelanden fran Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Matheron, G. (1963)Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology, 58, 1246-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathworks (2000)Matlab, version 6. 1. Natick, Massachusetts.

  • Nychka, D., Yang, Q., and Royle, J. A. (1997)Constructing spatial designs using regression subset selection, in Statistics for the Environment Barnett V. and Turkman K. F. (eds. ), Vol. 3 Pollutation Assessment and Control. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olea, R. A. (1984)Sampling design optimization for spatial functions. Mathematical Geology, 16, 369-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Jr. D. L. and Olsen, A. R. (1999)Spatially restricted surveys over time for aquatic resources. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Vol. 4 (4), pp. 415-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Jr. D. L. and Olsen, A. R. (2000)Spatially-restricted Random sampling Designs for Design-based and Model-based estimation. In Accuracy 2000:Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Delft University Press, The Netherlands. pp. 609-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Jr. D. L. and Olsen, A. R. (2004)Spatially balanced sampling of natural resources. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99 (465), 262-278 (17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Groenigen, J. W. (2000)The influence of variogram parameters on optimal sampling scheme for mapping by kriging. Geoderma, 97, 223-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Groenigen, J. W. and Stein, A. (1998)Spatial Simulated Annnealing for constrained optimization of spatial sampling schemes, Journal of Environmental Quality, 27, 1078-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, I. and Rogerson, P. (2003)An empirical comparison of edge effects correction methods applied to K-function analysis. Geographical Analaysis. 35, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yfantis, E. A., Flatman, G. T., and Behar, J. V. (1987)Effciency of kriging estimation for square, triangular, and hexagonal grids. Mathematical Geology, 19, 183-205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zio, S.D., Fontanella, L. & Ippoliti, L. Optimal spatial sampling schemes for environmental surveys. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 11, 397–414 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-004-4186-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-004-4186-9