Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conceptual and procedural teaching: does one teaching approach moderate the relationship between the other teaching approach and algebra achievement?

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In mathematics education, researchers often contrast conceptual and procedural teaching approaches, although labels and conceptualizations often vary across studies. Prior research has extensively examined empirical relationships between the two teaching approaches and mathematics achievement. In our study, we aimed to extend this research by exploring whether one teaching approach moderates the relationship between the other teaching approach and algebra achievement. Specifically, we investigated whether the relationship between one teaching approach and algebra achievement differs depending on the degree to which the other teaching approach is implemented. We used data from the High School Longitudinal Study (HSLS:2009) that was conducted in the USA. In our study, procedural teaching was measured as the amount of emphasis that teachers placed on objectives related to procedures and computational skills, whereas conceptual teaching was measured as the amount of emphasis that teachers placed on objectives related to understanding, application, and motivation. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was used to analyze the data, thus accounting for clustering of students within classes and classes within teachers. We found a statistically non-significant interaction effect. This result suggests that the association between one teaching approach and algebra achievement is similar across the degrees of the other teaching approach. Furthermore, we found a statistically significant association between conceptual teaching and algebra achievement. Specifically, conceptual teaching was positively related to algebra achievement. For procedural teaching, we found a statistically non-significant association. Hence, we did not find evidence that procedural teaching is related to algebra achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data are publicly available on the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) website: https://nces.ed.gov/.

References

  • Bietenbeck, J. (2014). Teaching practices and cognitive skills. Labour Economics, 30, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, P. F., Nishio, M., Smith, T. M., Clark, L. M., Conant, D. L., Rust, A. H., DePiper, J. N., Frank, T. J., Griffin, M. J., & Choi, Y. (2014). The relationship between teachers’ mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge, teachers’ perceptions, and student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45, 419–459. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. B., Brendefur, J. L., Hughes, G. R., & Thiede, K. (2015). Developing a mathematical instructional practice survey: Considerations and evidence. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 4, 93–118. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.4.1.0093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gales, M. J., & Yan, W. (2001, April). Relationship between constructivist teacher beliefs and instructional practices to students’ mathematical achievement: Evidence from TIMMS. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. Retrieved June 9, 2019, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED456133

  • Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., Stecher, B. M., Klein, S. P., Robyn, A., & Bugliari, D. (2003). Studying large-scale reforms of instructional practice: An example from mathematics and science. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025001001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo-Cabrillana, A., & Lopez-Mayan, C. (2018). Teaching styles and achievement: Student and teacher perspectives. Economics of Education Review, 67, 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSLS:09. (n.d.). Retrieved July 24, 2017, from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/hsls09/

  • Ingels, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Herget, D. R., Burns, L. J., Dever, J. A., Ottem, R., Rogers, J. E., Jin, Y., & Leinwand, S. (2011). High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09). Base-year data file documentation (NCES 2011–328). National Center for Education Statistics.

  • Ji, J. J. (2020). Relationship among U.S. mathematics teachers’ beliefs, teaching strategies and performance of ninth grade ethnically diverse students [Thesis]. Retrieved June 17, 2022, from https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/handle/2346/86665

  • Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. T., & Lubienski, C. (2006). School sector and academic achievement: A multilevel analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 651–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado, S. I. (2016). The impact of mathematical literacy practices on Latina/os’ achievement [UC Santa Cruz]. Retrieved November 20, 2018, from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5rr417mz

  • Matthews, P., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2009). In pursuit of knowledge: Comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, D. F., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Klein, S. P., Bugliari, D., & Robyn, A. (2001). Interactions among instructional practices, curriculum, and student achievement: The case of standards-based high school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 493–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/749803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuillen, G. (2016). Conceptually- and procedurally-oriented mathematics instruction, achievement, and equity: Results from the High School Longitudinal Study (HSLS:2009). Retrieved June 9, 2019, from https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/33797241

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Muthén & Muthén.

  • Osborne, M. (2021). Teacher instructional practices and student mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(1), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2021.11.1.25

  • Pampaka, M., & Williams, J. (2016). Mathematics teachers’ and students’ perceptions of transmissionist teaching and its association with students’ dispositions. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 35(3), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrw007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Teacher’s pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0601_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, T., Wang, C., & Harbaugh, A. P. (2013). Relationships between student, teacher, and school characteristics and mathematics achievement. School Science & Mathematics, 113, 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pong, S.-L. (1997). Family structure, school context, and eighth-grade math and reading achievement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 734–746. https://doi.org/10.2307/353957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., & Cheong, Y. F. (1993). Higher order instructional goals in secondary schools: Class, teacher, and school influences. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 523–553. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312030003523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In R. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1118–1134). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2018). SAS/STAT® 15.1 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc.

  • Sharpe, S. T., & Marsh, D. D. (2022). A systematic review of factors associated with high schoolers’ algebra achievement according to HSLS:09 results. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10130-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosniak, L. A., Ethington, C. A., & Varelas, M. (1991). Teaching mathematics without a coherent point of view: Findings from the IEA Second International Mathematics Study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23, 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027910230202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy–value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Kunter, M., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krause, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 249–271). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, R., & Singh, K. (2018). Teacher support, instructional practices, student motivation, and mathematics achievement in high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 111, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1204260

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daria Gerasimova.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was completed while Margret Hjalmarson was serving as a program director at the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gerasimova, D., Miller, A.D. & Hjalmarson, M.A. Conceptual and procedural teaching: does one teaching approach moderate the relationship between the other teaching approach and algebra achievement?. Educ Stud Math 114, 181–198 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10219-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10219-y

Keywords

Navigation