In this paper, we offer a framework for teacher monitoring routines—a consequential yet understudied aspect of instruction when teachers oversee students’ working together. Using a comparative case study design, we examine eight lessons of experienced secondary mathematics teachers, identifying common interactional routines that they take up with variation. We present a framework that illuminates the common moves teachers make while monitoring, including how they initiate conversations with students, their forms of conversational entry, the focus of their interactions, when and how they exit the interaction as well as the conversation’s overall participation pattern. We illustrate the framework through our focal cases, highlighting the instructional issues the different enactments engage. By breaking down the complex work of groupwork monitoring, this study informs both researchers and teachers in understanding the teachers’ role in supporting students’ collaborative mathematical sensemaking.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aguirre, J., Mayfield-Ingram, K., & Martin, D. (2013). The impact of identity in K-8 mathematics: rethinking equity-based practices. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Bakker, A. (2018). Design research in education: a practical guide for early career researchers. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: introduction and review. ZDM, 47(7), 1047–1065.
Battey, D. (2013). “Good” mathematics teaching for students of color and those in poverty: the importance of relational interactions within instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 125–144.
Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: building on the knowledge of students and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(5), 457–470.
Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54.
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Ding, M., Li, X., Piccolo, D., & Kulm, G. (2007). Teacher interventions in cooperative-learning mathematics classes. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(3), 162–175.
Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268.
Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315.
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118.
Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225–256). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231.
González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2006). Funds of knowledge: theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.
Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524–549.
Horn, I. S. (2012). Strength in numbers: collaborative learning in secondary mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Horn, I. S. (2017). Motivated: designing math classrooms where students want to join in. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Horn, I. S. (2020). Supporting the development of pedagogical judgment: connecting instruction to contexts through classroom video with experienced mathematics teachers. In G. M. Lloyd (Ed.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (vol. 3, pp. 289–310). Leiden: Brill.
Horn, I. S., & Kane, B. D. (2015). Opportunities for professional learning in mathematics teacher workgroup conversations: relationships to instructional expertise. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 373–418.
Horn, I. S., & Kane, B. D. (2019). What we mean when we talk about teaching: The limits of professional language and possibilities for professionalizing discourse in teachers’ conversations. Teachers College Record, 121(6), 1–34.
Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181–217.
Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, M. M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kumashiro, K. K. (2001). “Posts” perspectives on anti-oppressive education in social studies, English, mathematics, and science classrooms. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 3–12.
Lampert, M., Boerst, T. A., & Graziani, F. (2011). Organizational resources in the service of school-wide ambitious teaching practice. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1361–1400.
Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225.
Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 107–124.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lavie, I., Steiner, A., & Sfard, A. (2019). Routines we live by: from ritual to exploration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(2), 153–176.
Leander, K. M. (2002). Silencing in classroom interaction: Producing and relating social spaces. Discourse Processes, 34(2), 193–235.
Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2013). Better than best practice: developing teaching and learning through dialogue. New York, NY: Routledge.
Liljedahl, P. (2019). Conditions for supporting problem solving: vertical non-permanent surfaces. In P. Liljedahl & M. Santos-Trigo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving (pp. 289–310). Cham: Springer.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
Lotan, R. A. (2003). Group-worthy tasks. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 72–75.
Louie, N. L. (2017). The culture of exclusion in mathematics education and its persistence in equity-oriented teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(5), 488–519.
Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528.
Moschkovich, J. (2007). Using two languages when learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(2), 121–144.
NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: a needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
Schoenfeld, A., Dosalmas, A., Fink, H., Sayavedra, A., Tran, K., Weltman, A., … Zuniga-Ruiz, S. (2019). Teaching for robust understanding with lesson study. In R. Huang, A. Takahashi, & J. P. da Ponte (Eds.), Theory and practice of lesson study in mathematics (pp. 135–159). Cham: Springer.
Shah, N., & Lewis, C. M. (2019). Amplifying and attenuating inequity in collaborative learning: toward an analytical framework. Cognition and Instruction, 37(4), 423–452.
Smith, M., & Sherin, M. G. (2019). The 5 practices in practice: successfully orchestrating mathematical discussion in your middle school classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Smith, M. S., Bill, V., & Hughes, E. K. (2007). Thinking through a lesson: the key to successfully implementing high-level tasks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(3).
Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: an analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., De, T., Chan, A. G., Freund, D., Shein, P., & Melkonian, D. K. (2009). ‘Explain to your partner’: teachers' instructional practices and students' dialogue in small groups. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 49–70.
Wegerif, R., Fujita, T., Doney, J., Linares, J. P., Richards, A., & Van Rhyn, C. (2017). Developing and trialing a measure of group thinking. Learning and Instruction, 48, 40–50.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
We are thankful to the participating teachers, as well as Nicole Louie and Anna Sfard who gave helpful feedback on earlier stages of work, Avital Ashtar for her help with the graphic representations, and the SIGMa research team: Patricia Buenrostro, Grace Chen, Brette Garner, Mariah Harmon, Lara Jasien, Samantha Marshall, Elizabeth Metts, Jessica Moses, Katherine Schneeberger McGugan, and Chi Xiao. Feedback from the three anonymous reviewers strengthened the final manuscript. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant #DRL-1620920. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or other collaborators.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Nadav Ehrenfeld and Ilana S. Horn contributed equally to this paper.
About this article
Cite this article
Ehrenfeld, N., Horn, I.S. Initiation-entry-focus-exit and participation: a framework for understanding teacher groupwork monitoring routines. Educ Stud Math 103, 251–272 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09939-2
- Mathematics teaching
- Collaborative learning