Abstract
This paper reports on gender and participation in one inquiry-oriented undergraduate mathematics course. While there is evidence that inquiry can better support all learners, especially women, less is known about the distribution of participation in inquiry classrooms. Here, we focus on how men and women participated in both public spaces (in plenary with the whole class) and private spaces (with their group members). We found that while many women provided a large number of high-level “why” contributions in their groups, this did not necessary translate to participation in plenary discussions. We thus argue that women’s competence was hidden to the whole class, which contributes to the systematic marginalization of women in mathematics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this class, homogeneous coordinate notation consisted of points represented by a triple (X,Y,Z) and lines represented by a triple [X,Y,Z]. Furthermore, both points and lines belong to equivalence classes, and as such, can be represented by more than one triple—in which case the line or point is being represented on a different plane. The criterion for a point to be on a line is if the dot product of the triple representing the point and the triple representing the line is zero.
Lines of talk that are omitted from the transcript are times at which the group is focused on the mathematical task, or instances in which the group is off topic, but in a non-gender-problematic way.
References
Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(5), 1860–1863.
Boaler, J. (1997). Reclaiming school mathematics: The girls fight back. Gender and Education, 9(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259721268
Boaler, J. (2002). Paying the price for “sugar and spice”: Shifting the analytical lens in equity research. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 127–144.
Boaler, J. (2006). How a detracked mathematics approach promoted respect, responsibility, and high achievement. Theory Into Practice, 45(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4501_6
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 171–200). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Brandell, G. (2008). Progress and stagnation of gender equity: Contradictory trends within mathematics research and education in Sweden. ZDM, 40(4), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0127-7
Brown, C. S., & Leaper, C. (2010). Latina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescence. Sex Roles, 63(11–12), 860–870.
Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249–254.
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory into practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Daro, P. (2019). The 5x8 card. Retrieved February 8, 2019, from https://math.serpmedia.org/5x8card/.
Dasgupta, N., Scircle, M. M., & Hunsinger, M. (2015). Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16), 4988–4993. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422822112
Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLOS ONE, 11(7), e0157447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447
Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0288
Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L. M., Oslund, J. A., Parks, A. N., & Wood, M. B. (2011). Smarter together! Collaboration and equity in the elementary math classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Foyn, T., Solomon, Y., & Braathe, H. J. (2018). Clever girls’ stories: The girl they call a nerd. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9801-4
Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Brisson, B. M., Häfner, I., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Fostering adolescents’ value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1226–1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000028
Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Toward a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 145–187.
Hand, V., & Gresalfi, M. (2015). The joint accomplishment of identity. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075401
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Shah, N. (2019). Detecting and reducing bias in questioning patterns. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 24(5), 282–289.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94.
Houssart, J. (2001). Rival classroom discourses and inquiry mathematics: “The whisperers”. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(3), 2–8.
Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.595881
Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1148529
Laursen, S. L., Hassi, M. L., Kogan, M., & Weston, T. J. (2014). Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics: A multi-institution study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 406–418.
Laursen, S. L., & Rasmussen, C. (2019). I on the prize: Inquiry approaches in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00085-6
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 3(3), 149–164.
Leder, G. C. (2015). Gender and mathematics education revisited. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 145–170). Springer International Publishing.
Leyva, L. A. (2017). Unpacking the male superiority myth and masculinization of mathematics at the intersections: A review of research on gender in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 397–433. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0397
Lubienski, S. T., & Ganley, C. M. (2017). Research on gender and mathematics. In J. Cai (Ed.), First compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 649–666). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Martin, D. B. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth: The roles of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.
Masanja, V. G. (2010). Increasing women’s participation in science, mathematics and technology education and employment in Africa. In United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women: Expert group meeting: Gender, science, and technology. Butare, Huye, Rwanda: National University of Rwanda & University of Dar es Salaam.
Mathematical Association of America. (2018). Instructional practices guide. Retrieved from https://www.dropbox.com/s/42oiptp46i0g2w2/MAA_IP_Guide_V1-2.pdf?dl=0. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
McAfee, M. (2014). The kinesiology of race. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 468–491. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.u3ug18060x847412
Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing ‘good at maths’. Gender and Education, 17(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025042000301465
Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297.
Nasir, N. S. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 213–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_6
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematics success for all. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Science Board. (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators (NSB-2018-1). Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/nsb20181.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
Piatek-Jimenez, K. (2015). On the persistence and attrition of women in mathematics. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 5(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201501.03
Pierce, C. (1970). Offensive mechanisms. In F. B. Barbour (Ed.), The Black 70’s (pp. 265–282). Boston, MA: Porter Sargent.
Reinholz, D. L., Bradfield, K., & Apkarian, N. (2019). Using analytics to support instructor reflection on student participation in a discourse-focused undergraduate mathematics classroom. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education., 5, 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00084-7
Reinholz, D. L., & Shah, N. (2018). Equity analytics: A methodological approach for quantifying participation patterns in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 140–177.
Robinson-Cimpian, J. P., Lubienski, S. T., Ganley, C. M., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ mathematics proficiency may exacerbate early gender gaps in achievement. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1262–1281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035073
Rodd, M., & Bartholomew, H. (2006). Invisible and special: Young women’s experiences as undergraduate mathematics students. Gender and Education, 18(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500195093
Sadker, D., Sadker, M., & Zittleman, K. R. (2009). Still failing at fairness: How gender bias cheats girls and boys in school and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Sax, L. J., Kanny, M. A., Riggers-Piehl, T. A., Whang, H., & Paulson, L. N. (2015). “But I’m not good at math”: The changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education, 56(8), 813–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9375-x
Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences (Vol. 12). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(1), 42–76.
Shah, N. (2017). Race, ideology, and academic ability: A relational analysis of racial narratives in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–42.
Shah, N., & Lewis, C. M. (2019). Amplifying and attenuating inequity in collaborative learning: Toward an analytical framework. Cognition and Instruction, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1631825
Sharpe, D. (2015). Your chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(8), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=8
Solomon, Y. (2007). Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in undergraduate mathematics? Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601099473
Solomon, Y. (2012). Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9384-z
Solomon, Y., Lawson, D., & Croft, T. (2011). Dealing with ‘fragile identities’: Resistance and refiguring in women mathematics students. Gender and Education, 23(5), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2010.512270
Solomon, Y., Radovic, D., & Black, L. (2016). “I can actually be very feminine here”: Contradiction and hybridity in becoming a female mathematician. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9649-4
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28.
Staats, C., Capatosto, K., Wright, R. A., & Jackson, V. W. (2016). State of the science: Implicit bias review 2016. Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/implicit-bias-2016.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Sumpter, L. (2016a). ‘Boys press all the buttons and hope it will help’: Upper secondary school teachers’ gendered conceptions about students’ mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(8), 1535–1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9660-3
Sumpter, L. (2016b). Investigating upper secondary school teachers’ conceptions: Is mathematical reasoning considered gendered? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9634-5
Walkerdine, V. (1998). Counting girls out: Girls and mathematics. London, UK: Falmer Press.
Walshaw, M. (2001). A Foucauldian gaze on gender research: What do you do when confronted with the tunnel at the end of the light? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.2307/749802
Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366–389.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ernest, J.B., Reinholz, D.L. & Shah, N. Hidden competence: women’s mathematical participation in public and private classroom spaces. Educ Stud Math 102, 153–172 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09910-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09910-w