The role of perceptual similarity, context, and situation when selecting attributes: considerations made by 5–6-year-olds in data modeling environments

Abstract

Classroom data modeling involves posing questions, identifying attributes of phenomena, measuring and structuring these attributes, and then composing, revising, and communicating the outcomes. Selecting attributes is a fundamental component of data modeling, and the considerations made when selecting attributes is the focus of this paper. A teaching experiment involving 2 teacher educators and 25 pre-service teachers (PSTs) was carried out with 24 young children (5–6-year-olds) as part of a 4-day data modeling investigation. Although perceptual features of the data influenced initial approaches to attribute selection, considerations of the problem situation influenced a shift from the perceptual and towards consideration of attributes such as taxonomy, habitat, behavior, and diet. Expertise in the data context (animal kingdom) and ability to collaborate and negotiate within groups supported children in their ability to switch attributes, attend to multiple situations presented by the problem, and modify and extend their categorizations of data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The children appeared unaware that polar bears are arctic animals and penguins reside in a number of regions (typically the southern hemisphere, sometimes Antarctic, and sometimes residing in tropical islands). They are not all cold weather birds.

References

  1. Blair, M., & Somerville, S. C. (2009). The importance of differentiation in young children’s acquisition of expertise. Cognition, 112, 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chi, M. T. H., & Koeske, R. D. (1983). Network representation of a child’s dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21(1), 1–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Darmody, M., & Smyth, E. (2012). Exploring school and classroom environments in Irish primary schools. Children, Youth and Environments, 22(1), 178–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DiSessa, A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Metarepresentational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10(1), 117–160.

    Google Scholar 

  8. English, L. D. (2010). Young children’s early modelling with data. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 24–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. English, L. D. (2012). Data modelling with first-grade students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81, 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ertle, B., Chokshi, S., & Fernandez, C. (2001). Lesson planning tool. Retrieved November 28 2016, from www.tc.columbia.edu/centers/lessonstudy/doc/Lesson_Planning_Tool.pdf

  11. Fletcher-Janzen, E., Strickland, T. L., & Reynolds, C. (2000). Handbook of cross-cultural neuro-psychology. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615- 4219-3

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gelman, S. A. (2006). Early conceptual development. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of early childhood development (pp. 149–166). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gelman, S. A., Chesnick, R., & Waxman, S. R. (2005). Mother-child conversations about pictures and objects: Referring to categories and individuals. Child Development, 76, 1129–1143.

  14. Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23, 183–209.

  15. Gentner, D., & Namy, L. L. (1999). Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development, 14, 487–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hancock, C., Kaput, J. T., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 337–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanner, S., James, E., & Rohlfing, M. (2002). Classification models across grades. In R. Lehrer & L. Schauble (Eds.), Investigating real data in the classroom (pp. 99–117). New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. M. (2016). Practical problems: Introducing statistics to kindergarteners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(5), 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, K. E., & Mervis, C. B. (1994). Microgenetic analysis of first steps in children’s acquisition of expertise on shorebirds. Developmental Psychology, 30, 418–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kinnear, V. (2013). Young children’s statistical reasoning: A tale of two contexts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

  21. Kinnear, V., & Clarke, J. (2016). Young children’s abductive reasoning about data. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Hamburg, July 24–31. Retrieved from http://icme13.org/files/ICME13-Programme356_low36.pdf

  22. Leavy, A. M. (2015). Looking at practice: Revealing the knowledge demands of teaching data handling in the primary classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(3), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0138-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leavy, A. M., & Hourigan, M. (2015). Motivating inquiry in statistics and probability in the primary classroom. Teaching Statistics, 37(2), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12062

    Google Scholar 

  24. Leavy, A. M., & Hourigan, M. (2016a). Crime scenes and mystery players! Using interesting contexts and driving questions to support the development of statistical literacy. Teaching Statistics, 38(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12088

  25. Leavy, A. M., & Hourigan, M. (2016b). Using lesson study to support knowledge development in initial teacher education: Insights from early number classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.002

  26. Lehrer, R., Kim, M., & Schauble, L. (2007). Supporting the development of conceptions of statistics by engaging students in measuring and modeling variability. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12, 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Inventing data structures for representational purposes: Elementary grade students’ classification models. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 21(1&2), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2007). Contrasting emerging conceptions of distribution in contexts of error and natural variation. In M. C. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 149–176). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (Eds.). (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 197–230). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2003). Mathematical learning. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology  (Vol. 7, pp. 357–390). New York: John Wiley.

  32. Paparistodemou, E., & Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M. (2008). Enhancing reasoning about statistical inference in 8 year-old students. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Petersen, L. A., & McNeil, N. M. (2013). Effects of perceptually rich manipulatives on preschoolers’ counting performance: Established knowledge counts. Child Development, 84(3), 1020–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B. (2005). They call it like they see it: Spontaneous naming and attention to shape. Developmental Science, 8, 182–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Uzzell, B. P., Ponton, M., & Ardila, A. (Eds.). (2013). International handbook of cross-cultural neuropsychology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  36. Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry (with discussion). International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the work of all reviewers and editors of this manuscript who invested their time and energy in providing insightful and constructive feedback on earlier versions of this paper.

Funding

The research was supported by a faculty seed-funding grant [SF16-101] from Mary Immaculate College.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aisling Leavy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leavy, A., Hourigan, M. The role of perceptual similarity, context, and situation when selecting attributes: considerations made by 5–6-year-olds in data modeling environments. Educ Stud Math 97, 163–183 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9791-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Data modeling
  • Attribute selection
  • Statistical inquiry
  • Young children
  • Teaching mathematics
  • Statistics
  • Elementary education