This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Czocher, J. A., & Moss, D. L. (2017). Are students’ prior experiences important? Mathematics Teacher, 111(9), 664–660.
D’Ambrosio, U. (1990). The role of mathematics education in building a democratic and just society. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(3), 20–23.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Bloomsbury.
Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25.
González, G., & Herbst, P. (2013). An oral proof in a geometry class: How linguistic tools can help map the content of a proof. Cognition and Instruction, 31(3), 271–313.
Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21(1), 6–13.
Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21.
Lange, M. (2009). Why proofs by mathematical induction are generally not explanatory. Analysis, 69(2), 203–211.
Larsen, S., & Zandieh, M. (2008). Proofs and refutations in the undergraduate mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 205–216.
Mancosu, P. (2001). Mathematical explanation: Problems and prospects. Topoi, 20(1), 97–117.
Rasmussen, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2015). Examining individual and collective level mathematical progress. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(2), 259–281.
Schwarz, B. B., & Linchevski, L. (2007). The role of task design and argumentation in cognitive development during peer interaction: The case of proportional reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 510–531.
Stylianides, G. J., Sandefur, J., & Watson, A. (2016). Conditions for proving by mathematical induction to be explanatory. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 20–34.
Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Weber, K. (2017). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 237–266). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.
Zazkis, D., Weber, K., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2016). Bridging the gap between graphical arguments and verbal-symbolic proofs in a real analysis context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(2), 155–173.
Zhen, B., Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2016). Mathematics majors’ perceptions of the admissibility of graphical inferences in proofs. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–29.
I am grateful to Jenn Czocher for providing many helpful comments on an earlier draft of this review.
A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9792-1.
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, K. Book review: Baruch B. Schwarz and Michael J. Baker (Eds) (Foreword by L. B. Resnick with F. Schantz) (2017) Dialogue, Argumentation and Education: History, Theory and Practice . Educ Stud Math 97, 111–118 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9780-5