# Designing opportunities to learn mathematics theory-building practices

## Abstract

Mathematicians commonly distinguish two modes of work in the discipline: *Problem solving*, and *theory building*. Mathematics education offers many opportunities to learn problem solving. This paper explores the possibility, and value, of designing instructional activities that provide supported opportunities for students to learn mathematics theory-building practices. It begins by providing a definition of these theory-building practices on the basis of which to formulate principles for the design of such instructional activities. The paper offers theoretical arguments that theory-building practices serve not only the synthesizing role that they play in disciplinary mathematics, but they also have the potential to enrich learners’ reasoning powers and enhance their problem solving skills. Examples of problem sets designed for this purpose are provided and analyzed.

### Keywords

Theory building Problem solving Abstraction Instructional design### References

- Bass, H. (2016).
*Mathematical conections: Emergent, surprising, and intriguing. Submitted to The mathematics teacher*. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar - Bereiter, C. (2016). Theory building and education for understanding. In M. A. Peters. (Ed.),
*Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Education*. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-532-7370-1. - Columbia University Teachers College. (1967–69).
*Secondary School Mathematics Curriculum Improvement Study*. Retrieved from http://math.buffalostate.edu/~med600/SignedNumbrs/UnifiedMatematicsProject.pdf. - Davydov, V. V. (1999). What is real learning activity? In M. Hedegaard & J. Lompscher (Eds.),
*Learning activity and development*. Aarhus: University Press.Google Scholar - Dienes, Z. P., & Jeeves, M. A. (1965).
*Thinking in structures. Psychological monographs on cognitive processes*. London: Hutchinson Educational.Google Scholar - Gowers, W. T. (2000). The two cultures of mathematics. In V. I. Arnold, M. Atiyah, & B. W. Mazur (Eds.),
*Mathematics: frontiers and perspectives*(pp. 65–78). Providence: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar - Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B. B., & Dreyfus, T. (2001). Abstraction in context: epistemic actions.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32*(2), 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kondratieva, M. (2011). The promise of interconnecting problems for enriching students’ experiences in mathematics.
*The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 8*, 335–382.Google Scholar - Kruteskii, V. A. (1976).
*The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children*. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar - Lave, J. (1988).
*Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Leikin, R., & Levav-Waynberg, A. (2007). Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory-based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting tasks.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66*, 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lobato, J., & Siebert, D. (2002). Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21*, 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maher, C. A. (2010). The longitudinal study. In C. A. Maher, A. B. Powell, & E. B. Uptegrove (Eds.),
*Combinatorics and reasoning: Representing, justifying, and building isomorphisms*(pp. 3–8). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maher, C. A., Powell, A. B., & Uptegrove, E. (Eds.). (2010).
*Combinatorics and reasoning: Representing, justifying and building isomorphisms*. New York: Springer Publishers.Google Scholar - Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction as the result of a delicate shift of attention.
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 9*(2), 2–8.Google Scholar - Mason, J., Stephens, M., & Watson, A. (2009). Appreciating structure for all.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21*(2), 10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Piaget, J. (1994). Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning.
*Journal Research in Science Teaching, 1964*(2), 176–186.Google Scholar - Polya, G. (1957).
*How to solve it*. Garden City: Doubleday and Co., Inc.Google Scholar - Powell, A. B., Borge, I. C., Fioriti, G. I., Kondratieva, M., Koublanova, E., & Sukthankar, N. (2009). Chapter 4: Challenging tasks and mathematics learning. In E. J. Barbeau & P. J. Taylor (Eds.),
*Challenging Mathematics in and beyond the classroom*(pp. 133-170). New York: New ICMI Study Series 12, Springer.Google Scholar - Rittle-Johnson, B., Fyfe, E. R., McLean, L. E., & McEldoon, K. L. (2013). Emerging understanding of patterning in 4-year-olds.
*Journal of Cognition and Development, 14*(3), 376–396. doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.689897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sally, J. D., & Sally, P. J. (2007).
*Roots to research*. Providence: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Scheiner, T. (2016). New light on old horizon: Constructing mathematical concepts, underlying abstraction processes, and sense making strategies.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91*, 165–183. doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9665-4. - Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). Mathematical thinking and problem solving. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.),
*Studies in mathematical thinking and learning*. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar - Siegler, R. (1977). The twenty questions game as a form of problem solving.
*Child-Development, 48*(2), 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Silver, E. A. (1979). Student perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10*, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Silver, E. A. (Ed.). (1985).
*Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives*. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Simon, H., & Hayes, J. R. (1976). The understanding process: Problem isomorphs.
*Cognitive Psychology, 8*, 165–190.Google Scholar - Simpson, A., & Stehlíková, N. (2006). Apprehending mathematical structure: A case study of coming to understand a commutative ring.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61*, 347–371.Google Scholar - Usiskin, Z. (1968). Six nontrivial equivalent problems.
*The Mathematics Teacher, LXI*, 388–390.Google Scholar - Vygotsky, L. S. (1997).
*Educational psychology*. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar - Weiss, M. & Herbst, P. (2015). The role of theory-building in the teaching of secondary geometry.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89*: 205. doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9599-x.