# Students’ distributive reasoning with fractions and unknowns

## Abstract

To understand relationships between students’ quantitative reasoning with fractions and their algebraic reasoning, a clinical interview study was conducted with 18 middle and high school students. The study included six students with each of three different multiplicative concepts, which are based on how students create and coordinate composite units (units of units). Students participated in two 45-min semi-structured interviews and completed a written fraction assessment. This paper reports on how 12 students operating with the second and third multiplicative concepts demonstrated distributive reasoning in equal sharing problems and in taking fractions of unknowns. Students operating with the second multiplicative concept who demonstrated distributive reasoning appeared to lack awareness of the results of their reasoning, while students operating with the third multiplicative concept demonstrated this awareness and the construction of more advanced distributive reasoning when they worked with unknowns. Implications for relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and algebraic reasoning are explored.

### Keywords

Fractional knowledge Algebraic reasoning Distributive reasoning Distributive property Distributive partitioning scheme Multiplicative concepts Unknowns### References

- Bass, H. (1998). Algebra with integrity and reality. In G. Burrill & J. Ferrini-Mundy (Eds.),
*The nature and role of algebra in the K-14 curriculum*(pp. 9–15). Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar - Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T. R., & Lesh, R. (1993). Rational numbers: Toward a semantic analysis—Emphasis on the operator construct. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.),
*Rational numbers: An integration of research*(pp. 13–47). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Booth, L. R. (1984).
*Algebra: Children’s strategies and errors*. Windsor: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar - Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.),
*Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education*(pp. 547–589). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008). Experimenting to support and understand learning processes. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.),
*Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching*(pp. 68–95). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008).
*Basics of qualitative research*(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar - Ellis, A. B. (2007). Connections between generalizing and justifying: Students’ reasoning with linear relationships.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38*(3), 194–229.Google Scholar - Empson, S. B., Junk, D., Dominguez, H., & Turner, E. (2006). Fractions as the coordination of multiplicatively related quantities: A cross-sectional study of children’s thinking.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63*, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Empson, S. B., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. P. (2011). The algebraic nature of fractions: Developing relational thinking in elementary school. In J. Cai & E. J. Knuth (Eds.),
*Early algebraization*(pp. 409–428). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Students’ reasoning with reversible multiplicative relationships.
*Cognition and Instruction, 28*(4), 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2015). Relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and equation writing.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46*(2), 196–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hackenberg, A. J., & Tillema, E. S. (2009). Students’ whole number multiplicative concepts: A critical constructive resource for fraction composition schemes.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28*, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Izsák, A., Jacobson, E., de Araujo, Z., & Orrill, C. (2012). Measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching fractions with drawn quantities.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43*(4), 391–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.),
*Algebra in the early grades*(pp. 5–17). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Kieran, C. (2006). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.),
*Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education*(pp. 11–49). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar - Kilpatrick, J., & Izsák, A. (2008). A history of algebra in the school curriculum. In C. Greenes (Ed.),
*Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics: 2008 NCTM yearbook*(pp. 3–18). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar - Küchemann, D. (1981). Algebra. In K. Hart (Ed.),
*Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11–16*(pp. 102–119). London: John Murray.Google Scholar - Lamon, S. J. (1996). The development of unitizing: Its role in children’s partitioning strategies.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27*(2), 170–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning. In F. K. J. Lester (Ed.),
*Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 629–667). Charlotte: Information Age.Google Scholar - Linchevski, L., & Livneh, D. (1999). Structure sense: The relationship between algebraic and numerical contexts.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40*(2), 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Liss, D. R., II. (2015).
*Students’ construction of intensive quantity*[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Athens: University of Georgia.Google Scholar - MacGregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1997). Students’ understanding of algebraic notation: 11–15.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33*, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.),
*Mathematics teacher noticing*(pp. 35–50). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - National Mathematics Advisory Panel (NMAP). (2008).
*Report of the task group on conceptual skills and knowledge*. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar - Norton, A., & Boyce, S. (2015). Provoking the construction of a structure for coordinating
*n + 1*levels of units.*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40*, 211–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Norton, A., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2009). A quantitative analysis of children’s splitting operations and fraction schemes.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28*, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Olive, J., & Caglayan, G. (2008). Learners’ difficulties with quantitative units in algebraic word problems and the teacher’s interpretation of those difficulties.
*International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6*, 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Russell, S. J., Schifter, D., & Bastable, V. (2011). Developing algebraic thinking in the context of arithmetic. In J. Cai & E. J. Knuth (Eds.),
*Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives*(pp. 43–69). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Slavit, D. (1999). The role of operation sense in transitions from arithmetic to algebraic thought.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37*(3), 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Steffe, L. P. (1994). Children’s multiplying schemes. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.),
*The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics*(pp. 3–39). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar - Steffe, L. P., & Cobb, P. (1988).
*Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies*. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (2010).
*Children’s fractional knowledge*. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Streefland, L. (1991).
*Fractions in realistic mathematics education: A paradigm of developmental research*. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Thompson, P. W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25*, 165–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Thompson, P. W. (2010). Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling. In S. Chamberlin & L. L. Hatfield (Eds.),
*New perspectives and directions for collaborative research in mathematics education*(pp. 33–57). Laramie: University of Wyoming.Google Scholar - Vlassis, J. (2002). The balance model: Hindrance or support for the solving of linear equations with one unknown.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49*, 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - von Glasersfeld, E. (1995).
*Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning*(Vol. 6). London: Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar