# Turn vs. shape: teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle

Article

First Online:

## Abstract

This study is concerned with tensions between the two different perspectives on the concept of angle: angle as a static shape and angle as a dynamic turn. The goal of the study is to explore how teachers cope with these tensions. We analyze scripts of 16 in-service secondary mathematics teachers, which feature a dialogue between a teacher and students around the following statement: “The sum of the exterior angles of a polygon is 360°.” The findings show that while addressing a variety of intellectual needs of their student characters, in many cases, the teachers compromise the mathematical rigour of the concept of angle.

## Keywords

Angles Polygons Scriptwriting Intellectual needs Teacher knowledge Intuitive rules## References

- Abelson, H., & DiSessa, A. (1986).
*Turtle geometry: The computer as a medium for exploring mathematics*. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar - Akkoc, H. (2008). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ concept images of radian.
*International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39*(7), 857–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1990). The effects of Logo on children’s conceptualizations of angles and polygons.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21*(5), 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fi, C. (2003).
*Preservice secondary school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of trigonometry: Subject matter content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and envisioned pedagogy*(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar - Freudenthal, H. (1973).
*Mathematics as an educational task*. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar - Hadas, N., Hershkovitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2000). The role of contradiction and uncertainty in promoting the need to prove in dynamic geometry environments.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44*, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Harel, G. (2008). DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction, part II.
*Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 40*, 893–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Henderson, D. W., & Taimina, D. (2005).
*Experiencing geometry. Euclidean and non-Euclidean with history*. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar - Izard, V., O’Donnell, E., & Spelke, E. S. (2014). Reading angles in maps.
*Child Development, 85*(1), 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Koichu, B. (2008). On considerations of parsimony in mathematical problem solving. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepulova (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 32nd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 3, pp. 273–280). Monterrey, Mexico: PME.Google Scholar - Koichu, B. (2012). Enhancing an intellectual need for defining and proving: A case of impossible objects.
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 32*(1), 2–7.Google Scholar - Koichu, B., & Zazkis, R. (2013). Decoding a proof of Fermat’s little theorem via script writing.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32*, 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Krainer, K. (1991). Consequences of a low level of acting and reflecting in geometry learning-findings of interviews on the concept of angle. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the 15th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 2, pp. 254–261). Genoa, Italy: PME.Google Scholar - Krippendorff, K. (1980).
*Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology*. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar - Lakatos, I. (1976).
*Proofs and refutations*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mitchelmore, M. C. (1998). Young students’ concepts of turning and angle.
*Cognition and Instruction, 16*(3), 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mitchelmore, M. C., & White, P. (2000). Development of angle concepts by progressive abstraction and generalization.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41*, 209–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed?
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66*, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Piaget, J. (1985).
*The equilibration of cognitive structures: the central problem of intellectual development*. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar - Polygon. (n.d.). In
*Wikipedia*. Retrieved December 13 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygon - Ryan, R. M., & Deci, D. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.
*American Psychologist, 55*(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Smith, C. P., King, B., & Hoyte, J. (2014). Learning angles through movement: Critical actions for developing understanding in an embodied activity.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36*, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000).
*How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics: Intuitive rules*. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar - Talk: polygon. (n.d.). In
*Wikipedia*. Retrieved December 13 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Polygon - Usiskin, Z. (2008).
*The classification of quadrilaterals: A study of definition*. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar - Zazkis, D. (2014). Proof-scripts as a lens for exploring students’ understanding of odd/even functions.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35*, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zazkis, R., Sinclair, N., & Liljedahl, P. (2013).
*Lesson play in mathematics education: A tool for research and professional development*. Springer.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016