Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 92, Issue 3, pp 347–359 | Cite as

At the intersection between the subject and the political: a contribution to an ongoing discussion

Article

Abstract

The issue of subjectivity has recently occasioned a lively discussion in this journal opposing socioculturalism and Lacanian psychoanalysis. By confronting Luis Radford’s cultural theory with Jacques Lacan’s psychoanalysis, Tony Brown sought to show the limitations of socioculturalism. This article takes advantage of that discussion to develop a critique of Radford’s theory of objectification, taken as an exemplary sociocultural theorization of the teaching and learning of mathematics. It does so by extending the criticism made by Brown at the level of the subject, namely by showing what is lost in socioculturalism when it reduces the Hegelian notion of dialectics to a relation between constituted entities; but mostly by exploring the possibility opened by contemporary theory to posit the discussion around subjectivity in the political. While socioculturalism assumes the possibility of a synthesis between person and culture thus making education possible, it will be argued that a theory which assumes the impossibility of education is in a better position to, on the one hand, conceptualize the resistance of many towards the learning of mathematics, and on the other hand, to address the ongoing political failure in achieving the desired goal of “mathematics for all”.

Keywords

Cultural theory of objectification Socioculturalism Dialectics Subject Political School’s credit system Lacan Marx Žižek 

References

  1. Althusser, L. (2005). For Marx. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Baldino, R., & Cabral, T. (2005). Situations of psychological cognitive no-growth. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME29) (Vol. 2, pp. 105–112). Melbourne, Australia: PME.Google Scholar
  3. Baldino, R., & Cabral, T. (2013). The productivity of students’ schoolwork: An exercise on Marxist rigour. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 11(4), 1–15.Google Scholar
  4. Baldino, R., & Cabral, T. (2015). Profitability of qualified-labour-power production. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 13(1), 67–82.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, T. (2008a). Lacan, subjectivity, and the task of mathematics education research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, T. (2008b). Signifying “students”, “teachers” and “mathematics”: A reading of a special issue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(3), 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, T. (2012). Subjectivity and cultural adjustment in mathematics education: A response to Wolff-Michael Roth. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(3), 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobb, P. (2007). Putting philosophy to work: Coping with multiple theoretical perspectives. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics and learning. New York: Information Age.Google Scholar
  9. Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2007). Culture, identity, and equity in the mathematics classroom. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Diversity, equity, and access to mathematical ideas. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eagleton, T. (2001). Ideology, discourse, and the problems of ‘post-Marxism’. In S. Malpas (Ed.), Postmodern debates. Palgrave: Basingstoke, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Gutiérrez, R. (2010). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 1–32.Google Scholar
  12. Jablonka, E., Wagner, D., & Walshaw, M. (2013). Theories for studying social, political and cultural dimensions of mathematics education. In M. A. K. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education. New York and London: Springer Science + Business Media B.V. Google Scholar
  13. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lacan, J. (2000). The psychoses: The seminar of Jacques Lacan book III. London: Routledge. (Original work published 1981).Google Scholar
  15. Lacan, J. (2007). The other side of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan book XVII. New York: Norton & Company. (Original work published 1991).Google Scholar
  16. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Lundin, S. (2012). Hating school, loving mathematics: On the ideological function of critique and reform in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marx, K. (1976). Capital, volume 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Original work published 1867).Google Scholar
  20. Özselçuk, C., & Madra, Y. (2010). Enjoyment as an economical factor: Reading Marx with Lacan. Subjectivity, 3(3), 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pais, A. (2013). An ideology critique of the use-value of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pais, A. (2014). Economy: The absent centre of mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0625-8 Google Scholar
  23. Pais, A. (2015). Symbolising the real of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(3), 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2012). Researching research: Mathematics education in the political. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Presmeg, N., & Radford, L. (2008). On semiotics and subjectivity: A response to Tony Brown’s “signifying ‘students’, ‘teachers’, and ‘mathematics’: A reading of a special issue”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Radford, L. (2006a). The anthropology of meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Radford, L. (2006b). Elements of a Cultural Theory of Objectification. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, Special Issue on Semiotics, Culture and Mathematical Thinking, 103–129.Google Scholar
  28. Radford, L. (2008a). Culture and cognition: Towards an anthropology of mathematical thinking. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (2nd ed., pp. 439–464). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  29. Radford, L. (2008b). Theories in mathematics education: A brief inquiry into their conceptual differences. Working paper prepared for the ICMI10 Survey Team 7: The notion and role of theory in mathematics education research. (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  30. Radford, L. (2008c). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom and culture. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Radford, L. (2012). Education and the illusions of emancipation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Radford, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). Intercorporeality and ethical commitment: An activity perspective on classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roth, W.-M. (2012). Re/writing the subject: A contribution to post-structuralist theory in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(3), 451–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silver, E., & Herbst, P. (2007). Theory in mathematics education scholarship. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics and Learning. New York: Information Age.Google Scholar
  36. Souza, A., Linardi, P., & Baldino, R. (2002). Pesquisa-ação diferencial. Zetetiké, 10(17–18), 28–42.Google Scholar
  37. Sriraman, B., & English, L. (2010). Surveying theories and philosophies of mathematics education. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stech, S. (2008). School mathematics as a developmental activity. In A. Watson & P. Winbourne (Eds.), New directions for situated cognition in mathematics education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Vinner, S. (1997). From intuition to inhibition—mathematics education and other endangered species. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21th conference of the International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 63–78). Helsinki: Lahti Research and Training Centre, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  40. von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Aspects of radical constructivism and its educational recommendations. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.Google Scholar
  41. Walkerdine, V. (1998). Redefining the subject in situated cognitive theory. In D. Kirshner & J. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic and psychological perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  42. Walshaw, M. (2004). The pedagogical relation in postmodern times: Learning with Lacan. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern. USA: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Walshaw, M., Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., & Valero, P. (2011). Identity as the cornerstone of quality and equitable mathematical experiences. In Quality and equity in mathematics education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Watson A., & Winbourne, P. (Eds.). (2008). New Directions for Situated Cognition in Mathematics Education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Žižek, S. (2006). The parallax view. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Žižek, S. (2012). Less than nothing. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  47. Žižek, S. (2004). The ongoing “soft revolution”. Critical Inquiry, 30(2). Retrieved from http://criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu/issues/v30/30n2.Žižek.html
  48. Žižek, S. (2008a). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso. (Original work published 1981).Google Scholar
  49. Žižek, S. (2008b). For they know not what they do: Enjoyment as a political factor. London: Verso. (Original work published 1991).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations