Abstract
Learning experiences regarding the line of best fit are typically students’ first encounters with the fundamental topic of statistical association. Students bring with them into these learning experiences prior knowledge and experiences about mathematical lines and their properties, namely slope. This study investigated the role students’ conceptions of slope play in their conceptualization of the line of best fit and approaches to placing it informally (i.e., by eye). Task-based interviews concerning the meaning and placement of the line of best fit conducted with seven grade 8 students were analyzed for this study. The results showed that students’ conceptualizations of slope can play a significant role in their reasoning about the line of best fit, in both productive and unproductive ways. Analysis of associations between slope conceptualizations and students’ criteria for placing the line, accuracy of the placed line, and meaning of the line of best fit are presented. The discussion highlights implications of the study for the teaching of lines in both mathematical and statistical settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
Arbaugh, F., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Ramirez, N., Knuth, E., Kranendonk, H., & Quander, J. R. (2010). Linking research and practice: The NCTM research agenda conference report. Reston, VA: NCTM. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/news/content.aspx?id=25315
Bakker, A. (2004). Reasoning about shape as a pattern in variability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 64–83.
Casey, S. (2015). Examining student conceptions of covariation: A focus on the line of best fit. Journal of Statistics Education, 23(1).
Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 1–78.
Common Core Standards Writing Team. (2013). Progressions for the common core state standards in mathematics (draft). Front matter, preface, introduction. Grade 8, High School, Functions. Tucson, AZ: Institute for Mathematics and Education, University of Arizona. Retrieved from http://commoncoretools.me/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/ccss_progression_frontmatter_2013_07_30.pdf
Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI). (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Estepa, A., & Batanero, C. (1996). Judgments of correlation in scatterplots: Students’ intuitive strategies and preconceptions. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 4, 25–41.
Estepa, A., & Sanchez-Cobo, F. T. (2003). Evaluacion de la comprension de la correlacion y regression a partir de la resolucion de problemas. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(1), 54–68.
Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2005). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) report: A PreK-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
Garfield, J. B., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2004). Research on statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: Issues, challenges, and implications. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 397–409). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Groth, R. E. (2015). Working at the boundaries of mathematics education and statistics education communities of practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 4–16.
Konold, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2002). Data analysis as the search for signals in noisy processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 259–289.
Moore, D. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95–137). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Nagle, C., Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J., & Martin, K. (2013). Calculus students’ and instructors conceptualizations of slope: A comparison across academic levels. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 1491–1515.
Nolan, C., & Herbert, S. (2015). Introducing linear functions: An alternative statistical approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 401–421.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2007). The national curriculum 2007. Earlsdon Park, Coventry: Author.
Roschelle, J. (1995). Learning in interactive environments: Prior knowledge and new experience. In J. H. Falk & L. D. Dierking (Eds.), Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda (pp. 37–51). Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
Zaslavsky, O., Sela, H., & Leron, U. (2002). Being sloppy about slope: The effect of changing the scale. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 119–140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casey, S.A., Nagle, C. Students’ use of slope conceptualizations when reasoning about the line of best fit. Educ Stud Math 92, 163–177 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9679-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9679-y