Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 92, Issue 3, pp 361–377 | Cite as

Where form and substance meet: using the narrative approach of re-storying to generate research findings and community rapprochement in (university) mathematics education

Article

Abstract

Storytelling is an engaging way through which lived experience can be shared and reflected upon, and a tool through which difference, diversity—and even conflict—can be acknowledged and elaborated upon. Narrative approaches to research bring the richness and vibrancy of storytelling into how data is collected and interpretations of it shared. In this paper, I demonstrate the potency of the narrative approach of re-storying for a certain type of university mathematics education research (non-deficit, non-prescriptive, context-specific, example-centred and mathematically focused) conducted at the interface of two communities: mathematics education and mathematics. I do so through reference to Amongst Mathematicians (Nardi, 2008), a study carried out in collaboration with 20 university mathematicians from six UK mathematics departments. The study deployed re-storying to present data and analyses in the form of a dialogue between two fictional, yet entirely data-grounded, characters—M, mathematician, and RME, researcher in mathematics education. In the dialogues, the typically conflicting epistemologies—and mutual perceptions of such epistemologies—of the two communities come to the fore as do the feasibility-of, benefits-from, obstacles-in and conditions-for collaboration between these communities. First, I outline the use of narrative approaches in mathematics education research. Then, I introduce the study and its use of re-storying, illustrating this with an example: the construction of a dialogue from interview data in which the participating mathematicians discuss the potentialities and pitfalls of visualisation in university mathematics teaching. I conclude by outlining re-storying as a vehicle for community rapprochement achieved through generating and sharing research findings—the substance of research—in forms that reflect the fundamental principles and aims that underpin this research. My conclusions resonate with sociocultural constructs that view mathematics teacher education as contemporary praxis and the aforementioned inter-community discussion as taking place within a third space.

Keywords

Narrative inquiry Re-storying Dialogic format Mathematicians University mathematics education 

References

  1. Andrews, M. (2006). Exploring cross-cultural boundaries. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 489–511). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Artigue, M. (1998). Research in mathematics education through the eyes of mathematicians. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics Education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 477–490). Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, M. S., & Stauffer, S. L. (2009). Narrative inquiry: From story to method. In M. S. Barrett & S. L. Stauffer (Eds.), Narrative inquiry in music education: Troubling certainty (pp. 7–17). NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateson, M. C. (1994). Peripheral visions: Learning along the way. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  5. Biza, I., Jaworski, B., & Hemmi, K. (2014). Communities in university mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biza, I., Nardi, E., & Zachariades, T. (2007). Using tasks to explore teacher knowledge in situation-specific contexts. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burton, L. (2002). Children’s mathematical narratives as learning stories. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 10(2), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantú, N. (2012). Getting there cuando no hay camino (when there is no path): Paths to discovery testimonios by chicanas in STEM. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(3), 472–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr, D. (1986). Time, narrative, and history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 509–535). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Chase, S. E. (2011). Narrative inquiry: Still a field in the making. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 421–434). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Clandinin, D. J., Pushor, D., & Orr, A. M. (2007). Navigating sites for narrative inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2005). Narrative inquiry. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in educational research (pp. 477–489). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  18. Darragh, L. (2013). Constructing confidence and identities of belonging in mathematics at the transition to secondary school. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Frayn, M. (1998). Copenhagen. London: Methuen Drama.Google Scholar
  21. Frost, J. H. (2010). Looking through the lens of a teacher’s life: The power of prototypical stories in understanding teachers’ instructional decisions in mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldin, G. A. (2003). Developing complex understandings: On the relation of mathematics education research to mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 171–202.Google Scholar
  23. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano‐López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Healy, L., & Sinclair, N. (2007). If this is our mathematics, what are our stories? International Journal of Computers in Mathematical Learning, 12, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hernandez-Martinez, P. (2013). Teaching mathematics to engineers: Modelling, collaborative learning, engagement and accountability in a Third Space. Retrieved from www.esri.mmu.ac.uk/mect2/papers_13/hernandez.pdf
  27. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moreau, M. P., Mendick, H., & Epstein, D. (2010). Constructions of mathematicians in popular culture and learners’ narratives: A study of mathematical and non‐mathematical subjectivities. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nardi, E. (2008). Amongst Mathematicians: Teaching and learning mathematics at university level. USA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nardi, E. (2015). The many and varied crossing paths of Mathematics and Mathematics Education. Mathematics Today (Special Issue: Windows on Advanced Mathematics). In press.Google Scholar
  31. Nardi, E. & Iannone, P. (2003) Mathematicians on concept image construction: Single ‘landscape’ vs ‘your own tailor-made brain version’. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Psychology in Mathematics Education III (pp. 365–372). Honolulu: USA.Google Scholar
  32. Nardi, E., Ryve, A., Stadler, E., & Viirman, O. (2014). Commognitive analyses of the learning and teaching of mathematics at university level: The case of discursive shifts in the study of Calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 182–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nolan, K. (2010). Praxis. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), SAGE encyclopedia of case study research (Vol. 2, pp. 725–727). UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Ollerenshaw, J. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2002). Narrative research: A comparison of two restorying data analysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pais, A. (2013). An ideology critique of the use-value of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84, 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ralston, A. (2004). Research mathematicians and mathematics education: A critique. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 51, 403–411.Google Scholar
  37. Ricoeur, P. (1984, 1985, 1988). Time and narrative (Vols. I-III). Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schafer, R. (1981). Narration in the psychoanalytic dialogue. In W. J. T. Mitchell (Ed.), On narrative (pp. 25–50). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sfard, A. (1998). A mathematician's view of research in mathematics education: An interview with Shimshon A. Amitsur. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics Education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 445–458). Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. Human development, the growth of discourse, and mathematizing. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Solomon, Y. (2012). Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stoppard, T. (1993). Arcadia. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  43. Tall, D. O., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Webster, L., & Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method. UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education and Lifelong LearningUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations