Communicational perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics: prologue
This special issue comprises five studies which vary in their focus and mathematical content, yet they all share an underlying communicational theoretical framework—commognition. Within this framework, learning mathematics is defined as a change in one’s mathematical discourse, that is, in the form of communication known as mathematical. Teaching can be defined as the communicational activity the motive of which is to bring the learners’ discourse closer to a canonic discourse. Reading the five research articles interconnected via their shared theoretical infrastructure has the potential to further develop insights about various aspects of teaching and learning mathematics.
KeywordsCommunicational perspective Learning mathematics Discourse analysis
- Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Prediger, S. (Eds.). (2015). Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of prison. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.Google Scholar
- Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2015). Vicious cycles of identifying and mathematizing: A case study of the development of mathematical failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–46. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.999270.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Roth, W. M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.Google Scholar
- Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse research in mathematics education: A critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 167–199.Google Scholar
- Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. Journal of Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565–613.Google Scholar
- Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sfard, A. (ed.) (2012). Developing mathematical discourse - Some insights from communicational research. International Journal of Educational Research, 51&52.Google Scholar
- Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2013). Development of mathematical discourse: Insights from “strong” discursive research. Research forum. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 155–180). Kiel: PME.Google Scholar
- Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2015). Classroom engagement towards definition mediated identification: The case of functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(2), 163–187. doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9624-0.
- Wetherell, M. (2001). Themes in discourse research: The case of Diana. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 14–28). London: Sage.Google Scholar