Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 82, Issue 3, pp 455–479 | Cite as

Teaching prospective teachers about fractions: historical and pedagogical perspectives

Article

Abstract

Research shows that students, and sometimes teachers, have trouble with fractions, especially conceiving of fractions as numbers that extend the whole number system. This paper explores how fractions are addressed in undergraduate mathematics courses for prospective elementary teachers (PSTs). In particular, we explore how, and whether, the instructors of these courses address fractions as an extension of the whole number system and fractions as numbers in their classrooms. Using a framework consisting of four approaches to the development of fractions found in history, we analyze fraction lessons videotaped in six mathematics classes for PSTs. Historically, the first two approaches—part–whole and measurement—focus on fractions as parts of wholes rather than numbers, and the last two approaches—division and set theory—formalize fractions as numbers. Our results show that the instructors only implicitly addressed fraction-as-number and the extension of fractions from whole numbers, although most of them mentioned or emphasized these aspects of fractions during interviews.

Keywords

Whole numbers Fractions Rational numbers Part–whole Measurement and ratio Division Pre-service teacher education Elementary Mathematics K–12 

References

  1. Austin, D. (2007). Pulling digits out of pi. Feature column: Montly Essays on Mathematical Topics. http://www.ams.org/samplings/feature-column/fcarc-pi. Accessed 18 Sept 2010
  2. Ball, D. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Unpublished dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgart, J. K. (1969). Historical topics for the mathematics classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  5. Beckmann, S. (2005). Mathematics for elementary teachers. Boston: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Beckmann, S. (2008). Mathematics for elementary teachers (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  7. Behr, M., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1993). Rational numbers: Toward a semantic analysis—emphasis on the operator construct. In T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 13–47). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Berlinghoff, W. P., & Gouvea, F. Q. (2004). Math through the ages, Expanded edition. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America, Farmington, ME: Oxton House Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Cajori, F. (1928). A history of mathematical notation—Notations in elementary mathematics. Illinois: The Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  11. Childs, L. (1995). A concrete introduction to higher algebra. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, K. M. (2011). History of mathematics: illuminating understanding of school mathematics concepts for prospective mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics. http://www.springerlink.com/content/k5mv6814246755l5/. Accessed 26 Nov 2011
  13. Dantzig, T. (1954). Number: The language of science. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Dorier, J. (1998). The role of formalism in the teaching of the theory of vector spaces. Linear Algebra and Its Application, 275–276, 114–160.Google Scholar
  15. Dorier, J., Robert, A., Robinet, J., & Rogalski, M. (2000). On a research programme concerning the teaching and learning of linear algebra in the first-year of a French science university. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(1), 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erlwanger, S. H. (1973). Benny’s conception of rules and answers in IPI mathematics. Journal of Childrens Mathematical Behavior, 1(2), 7–26. Reprinted in Carpenter, T. P., Dossey, J. A., & Koehler, J. L. (Eds.). (2004). Classics in mathematics education research. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  17. Even, R. (2008). Facing the challenge of educating educators to work with practicing mathematics teachers. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education, vol 4. The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 57–74). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  18. Fauvel, J., & van Maanen, J. (Eds.). (2000). History in mathematics education: The ICMI study. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Fischbein, E., Jehiam, R., & Cohen, C. (1995). The concept of irrational number in high-school students and prospective teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hart, K. (1987). Children’s mathematics frameworks: part 2. What are equivalent fractions? Mathematics in School, 16(4), 5–7.Google Scholar
  21. Heath, T. L. (1956). The thirteen books of Euclid’s elements, vols. 1–3 (2nd ed.). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  22. Jankvist, J. T. (2009). A categorization of the “whys” and “hows” of using history in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 235–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kerslake, D. (1986). Fractions: Children’s strategies and errors. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  24. Kieren, T. E. (1992). Rational and fractional numbers as mathematical and personal knowledge: Implications for curriculum and instruction. In G. Leinhardt, R. Putnam, & R. A. Hattrup (Eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 323–372). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Klein, J. (1968). Greek mathematical thought and the origin of algebra. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lamon, S. L. (2001). Presenting and representing: From fractions to rational numbers. In A. Cuoco & F. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representations in school mathematics (2001), Yearbook, Reston: NCTM, (pp. 146–165).Google Scholar
  27. Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (2007), Information Age Publishing, Charlotte NC, (pp. 629–667).Google Scholar
  28. Ma, L. (1998). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Mack, N. K. (1990). Learning fractions with understanding: Building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mack, N. K. (1993). Learning rational numbers with understanding. The case of informal knowledge. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 85–105). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of elementary preservice teachers’ knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1080–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Osana, H. P., & Royea, D. A. (2011). Obstacles and challenges in preservice teachers’ explorations with fractions: A view from a small-scale intervention study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30, 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parker, T. H., & Baldridge, S. J. (2003). Elementary mathematics for teachers. Okemos: Sefton-Ash Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Pitkethly, A., & Hunting, R. (1996). A review of recent research in the area of initial fraction concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pogliani, L., Randic, M., & Trinajstic, N. (1998). Much ado about nothing—an introductory inquiry about zero. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 29, 729–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Post, T. R., Harel, G., Behr, M. J., & Lesh, R. (1988). Intermediate teachers knowledge of rational number concepts. In E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter, & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 177–198). New York: State University of NY Press.Google Scholar
  37. Post, T. R., Cramer, K. A., Lesh, R., Harel, G., & Behr, M. (1993). Curriculum implications of research on the learning, teaching and assessing of rational number concepts. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 327–362). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Radford, M. (1995). Before the other unknowns were invented: Didactic inquires on the method and programs of medieval Italian algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 28–38.Google Scholar
  39. Radford, M., Barolini-Bussi, M. G., Bekken, O., Boero, P., Dorier, J., Katz, V., Rogers, L., Sierpinska, A., & Vasco, C. (2002). Historical formation and student understanding of mathematics. New ICMI Study Series, 6, 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rizvi, N. F., & Lawson, M. J. (2007). Prospective teachers’ knowledge: Concept of division. International Education Journal, 8(2), 377–392.Google Scholar
  41. Seife, C. (2000). Zero, the biography of a dangerous idea. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  42. Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, D. E. (1923). History of mathematics, volume I. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, D. E. (1925). History of mathematics, volume II. New York: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
  45. Sowder, J. T., Bedzuk, N., & Sowder, L. K. (1993). Using principles from cognitive psychology to guide rational number instruction for prospective teachers. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 239–259). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Sowder, J., Philipp, R., Armstrong, B., & Schappelle, B. (1998). Middle-grade teachers’ mathematical knowledge and its relationship to instruction: A research monograph. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  47. Stafylidou, S., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 14, 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Streefland, L. (1993). Fractions: A realistic approach. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 289–325). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tirosh, D., Fischbein, E., Graeber, A. O., & Wilson, J. W. (1999). Prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of rational numbers. http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/texts.folder/tirosh/pros.el.tchrs.html. Accessed 11 Jun 2004
  51. Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). How many numbers are there in a rational number interval? Constraints, synthetic models and the effect of the number line. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 265–282). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  52. Weil, A. (1978). History of mathematics: Why and how. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Helsinki (pp. 227–236) 1978. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
  53. Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2009). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion. Canadian Journal of Science, 9(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
  54. Wilson, S., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.Google Scholar
  55. Wu, H. (2010). Learning school algebra in the U.S. In Y. Li & Z. Huan (Eds.), Mathematics education: Perspectives and practices in the East and West. Special Issue of Mathematics Bulletin (pp. 101–114). Beijing, China: Chinese Mathematical Society, Beijing Normal University.Google Scholar
  56. Zhou, Z., Peverly, S. T., & Xin, T. (2006). Knowing and teaching fractions: A cross-cultural study of American and Chinese mathematics teachers. Comtemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Kaput Center for Research and Innovation in STEM EducationUniversity of Massachusetts DartmouthFairhavenUSA
  3. 3.Teacher EducationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations