Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 82, Issue 3, pp 439–453 | Cite as

Examining the discourse on the limit concept in a beginning-level calculus classroom



Existing research on limits documents many difficulties students encounter when learning about the concept. There is also some research on teaching of limits but it is not yet as extensive as the research on student learning about limits. This study explores the discourse on limits in a beginning-level undergraduate calculus classroom by focusing on one instructor’s and his students’ discourses through a communicational approach to cognition. The findings indicate that some of the limit-related contexts in which students struggled coincided with those in which the instructor shifted his elements of discourse on limits. The instructor did not attend to the shifts in his discourse, making them implicit for the students. The study highlights that the discrepancies among participants’ discourses signal communicational breakages and suggests that future studies should examine whether teachers’ explicit attention to the elements of their discourse can enhance communication in the classrooms.


Limits Commognitive framework Teacher discourse Student discourse 


  1. Bagni, G. T. (2005). The historical roots of the limit notion: Cognitive development and development of representation registers. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 5(4), 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergsten, C. (2007). Investigating quality of undergraduate mathematics lectures. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(3), 48–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bezuidenhout, J. (2001). Limits and continuity: Some conceptions of first-year students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(4), 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D. O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153–166). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Edwards, C. H. (1979). The historical development of the calculus. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kjeldsen, T. H., & Blomhøj, M. (2012). Beyond motivation: history as a method for learning meta-discursive rules in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(3), 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kline, M. (1972). Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nardi, E. (2007). Amongst mathematicians: Teaching and learning mathematics at the university level. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Parameswaran, R. (2007). On understanding the notion of limits and infinitesimal quantities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sfard, A. (1992). Operational origin of mathematical objects and the quandary of reification—the case of function. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 59–84). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  13. Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1/3), 13–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses and mathematizing. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sfard, A., Forman, E., & Kieran, C. (2001). Guest editorial: Learning discourse: Sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1/3), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sierpińska, A. (1987). Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(4), 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tall, D. (1980). Mathematical intuition, with special reference to limiting processes. In Proceedings of the fourth International Congress on Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 170–176). CA: Berkeley.Google Scholar
  18. Tall, D., & Schwarzenberger, R. (1978). Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits. Mathematics Teaching, 82, 44–49.Google Scholar
  19. Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Williams, S. R. (1991). Models of limit held by college calculus students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams, S. R. (2001). Predications of the limit concept: An application of repertory grids. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kaput Center for Research and Innovation in STEM EducationUniversity of Massachusetts DartmouthFairhavenUSA

Personalised recommendations