Ambrose, B. S. (2004). Investigating student understanding in intermediate mechanics: Identifying the need for a tutorial approach to instruction. American Journal of Physics, 72(4), 453.
Black, K. E. (2010, August). Multiple perspectives on student solution methods for air resistance problems. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Dissertation Express database. (UMI No. 3445855).
Black, K. E., & Wittmann, M. C. (2007). Epistemic games in integration: Modeling resource choice. In L. Hsu, C. Henderson, & L. McCullough (Eds.), AIP conference proceedings, 2007 physics education research conference (Vol. 951, pp. 53–56). Melville: AIP.
Black, K. E., & Wittmann, M. C. (2009). Procedural resource creation in intermediate mechanics. In M. Sabella, C. Henderson, & C. Singh (Eds.), AIP conference proceedings, 2009 physics education research conference (Vol. 1179, pp. 97–101). Melville: AIP.
Camacho-Machín, M., Perdomo-Díaz, J., & Santos-Trigo, M. (2012). An exploration of students’ conceptual knowledge built in a first ordinary differential equations course (Part I). The Teaching of Mathematics, XV(1), 1–20.
Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2011). The nature of gestures’ beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 140(1), 102–116.
Cook, S. W., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2009). Embodied communication: Speakers’ gestures affect listeners’ actions. Cognition, 113(1), 98–104.
Edwards, L. D. (2009). Gestures and conceptual integration in mathematical talk. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 127–141.
Emmorey, S., & Casey, K. (2001). Gesture, thought and spatial language. Gesture, 1(1), 35–50.
Erlwanger, S. H. (1973). Benny’s conception of rules and answers in IPI mathematics. Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behavior, 1(2), 7–26.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Feyereisen, P., & Havard, I. (1999). Mental imagery and production of hand gestures while speaking in younger and older adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23(2), 153–171.
Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., Kriz, S., & Keehner, M. (2005). The role of gestures in mental animation use of gestures in mental animation. Psychology, 5(4), 333–356.
Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288.
Hutchins, E., & Palen, L. (1997). Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Situated cognition and technologically supported environments (pp. 23–40). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 390–419). New York: Macmillan.
Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 707–762). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Kirshner, D., & Awtry, T. (2004). Visual salience of algebraic transformations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 224–257.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007). The alignment of ordering and space in arithmetic computation. In Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 437–442).
Lavergne, J., & Kimura, D. (1987). Hand movement asymmetry during speech: No effect of speaking topic. Neuropsychologia, 25(4), 689–693.
Matlock, T. (2004). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden & K. U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation [Cognitive Linguistics Research] (pp. 221–247). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding mathematics. In N. Patemen, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 105–109). Honolulu, Hawaii
Nemirovsky, R., & Ferrara, F. (2009). Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 159–174.
Núñez, R. E. (2004). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In F. Iida, R. Pfeifer, L. Steels, & Y. Kuniyoshi (Eds.), Embodied artificial intelligence (pp. 54–73). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Núñez, R. E. (2005). Creating mathematical infinities: Metaphor, blending, and the beauty of transfinite cardinals. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1717–1741.
Núñez, R. E. (2010). Enacting infinity: Bringing transfinite cardinals into being. In J. R. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 307–333). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126.
Radford, L., & Puig, L. (2007). Syntax and meaning as sensuous, visual, historical forms of algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 145–164.
Rasmussen, C. L. (2001). New directions in differential equations: A framework for interpreting students’ understandings. Educational Research, 20, 55–87.
Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7, 226–231.
Rowland, D. R., & Jovanoski, Z. (2004). Student interpretations of the terms in first-order ordinary differential equations in modelling contexts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35(4), 503–516.
Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20(4), 457–497.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on process and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.
Sfard, A. (1994). Reification as the birth of metaphor. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 44–55.
Soon, W., Lioe, L. T., & Mcinnes, B. (2011). Understanding the difficulties faced by engineering undergraduates in learning mathematical modelling. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(8), 1023–1039.
Staats, S., & Batteen, C. (2009). Stretching, sliding and strategy: Indexicality in algebraic explanations. Research in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 57–71.
Staats, S., & Batteen, C. (2010). Linguistic indexicality in algebra discussions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29, 41–56.
Stephan, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2002). Classroom mathematical practices in differential equations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 459–490.
Stjernfelt, F. (2000). Diagrams as Centerpiece of a Peircean Epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 36(3), 357–384.
Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 211–296). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(3), 183–204.
Wittmann, M. C., & Ambrose, B. S. (2007). Intermediate Mechanics Tutorials: http://perlnet.umaine.edu/imt/.