Existing instruments designed to measure mathematics attitudes were too long, dated, or assessed with only western samples. To address this issue, a shortened version of the Attitudes Toward Mathematics Inventory (short ATMI) which measures four subscales—enjoyment of mathematics, motivation to do mathematics, self-confidence in mathematics, and perceived value of mathematics—was created. Its factor structure, reliability, and validity were assessed with 1,601 participants from Singapore. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the original four-factor structure. Within this structure, however, several items were found to correlate highly with others. Their removal either improved or did not impact the properties of the instrument. As a result, these items were removed to produce the short ATMI. Furthermore, a very high correlation (r = .96) was found between the enjoyment and motivation subscales. Results of further analysis suggested the removal of the motivation subscale. The short ATMI exhibited strong correlations with the original scale (mean r = .96), good overall internal consistencies, both for the full short version (α = .93) and for the individual subscales (mean α = .87), and satisfactory test–retest reliability over a 1-month period (mean r xx = .75). The validity of the short ATMI was further demonstrated through inter-correlations between its subscales, and through correlations with mathematics anxiety and achievement test scores. Participants were able to complete the short ATMI in less than 10 min, making it a viable option when survey administration time is limited. This time would reduce further with the removal of the motivation subscale.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aiken, L. R. (1974). Two scales of attitude toward mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 67–71.
Altonji, J. (1995). The effect of high school curriculum on education and labor market outcomes. The Journal of Human Resources, 30(3), 409–438.
Antonnen, R. G. (1969). A longitudinal study in mathematics attitude. The Journal of Educational Research, 62, 467–471.
Atkinson, J. W., & Raynor, J. (1974). Motivation and achievement. Washington, DC: Winston.
Ball, S. (Ed.). (1977). Motivation in education. New York: Academic.
Barkoukis, V., Tsorbatzoudis, H., Grouios, G., & Sideridis, G. (2008). The assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and amotivation: Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the academic motivation scale. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 39–55.
Bell, J. (1987). Doing your research project. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Bouchey, H. A., & Harter, S. (2005). Reflected appraisals, academic perceptions, and math/science performance during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 673–686.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–161). Newbury Park: Stage Publications.
Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer.
Chamberlin, S. A. (2010). A review of instruments created to assess affect in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 167–182.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Dossey, J. (1992). How school mathematics functions: Perspectives from the NAEP 1990 and 1992 assessments. Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED377057).
Fairbanks, P. J. (1992). Treating mathematics anxiety: The optional contract. Mathematics Teacher, 85(6), 428–430.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by males and females. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326.
Foire, G. (1999). Math-abused students: Are we prepared to teach them? Mathematics Teacher, 92, 403–407.
Gerardi, S. (1990). Academic self-concept as a predictor of academic success among minority and low-socioeconomic status students. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 402–407.
Goolsby, C. B. (1988). Factors affecting mathematics achievement in high-risk college students. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 4(2), 18–27.
Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 124–136.
Hackett, G. (1985). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 47–56.
Hauge, S. K. (1991). Mathematics anxiety: A study of minority students in an open admissions setting. Unpublished manuscript. Washington, DC: University of the District of Columbia. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED335229).
Houser, R. (1998). Counseling and educational research: Evaluation and application. London: Sage.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and application (pp. 76–99). London: Sage.
Joensen, J. S., & Nielsen, H. S. (2009). Is there a causal effect of high school mathematics on labor market outcomes? The Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 171–198.
Kenschaft, P. (Ed.). (1991). Winning women into mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Lim, S. Y., & Chapman, E. (2011). A psychometric investigation of the Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Anxiety Scale. Manuscript submitted for publication (Copy on file with authors).
Linn, M., & Hyde, J. (1989). Gender, mathematics, and science. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 17–27.
Longitudinal Study of American Youth (1990). The international center for the advancement of scientific literacy. Retrieved from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/30263?q=LSAY.
Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 26–47.
Minato, S. (1983). Some mathematical attitudinal data on eighth-grade students in Japan measured by a semantic differential. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 19–38.
Minato, S., & Yanase, S. (1984). On the relationship between students attitude towards school mathematics and their levels of intelligence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 313–320.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Porter, S. R. (Ed.). (2004). Overcoming survey research problems: New directions for institutional research (Vol. 121). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Randhawa, B. S., Beamer, J. E., & Lundberg, I. (1993). Role of the mathematics self-efficacy in the structural model of mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 41–48.
Rose, H., & Betts, J. (2004). The effect of high school courses on earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 497–513.
Samuelsson, J., & Granstrom, K. (2007). Important prerequisite for students’ mathematical achievement. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 3(2), 150–170.
Sherman, J., & Fennema, E. (1977). The study of mathematics by high school girls and boys: Related variables. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 159–168.
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.
Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Tapia, M. (1996, November). The attitudes toward mathematics instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-south Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, AL. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED404165).
Tapia, M., & II Marsh, G. E. (2000). Attitudes toward mathematics instrument: An investigation with middle school students. Bowling Green: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association.
Tapia, M., & II Marsh, G. E. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory. Chattanooga: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association.
Tapia, M., & II Marsh, G. E. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16–21.
Terwilliger, J., & Titus, J. (1995). Gender differences in attitudes and attitude changes among mathematically talented youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(1), 29–35.
Thorndike-Christ, T. (1991). Attitudes toward mathematics: Relationships to mathematics achievement, gender, mathematics course-taking plans, and career interests. Bellingham, WA: Western Washington University. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED347066).
Witherspoon, K. M., Speight, S. L., & Thomas, A. J. (1997). Racial identity attitudes, school achievement, and academic self-efficacy among African American high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 23, 344–357.
Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113–121.
About this article
Cite this article
Lim, S.Y., Chapman, E. Development of a short form of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory. Educ Stud Math 82, 145–164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9414-x