Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Education and the illusions of emancipation

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, I deal with the question of emancipation in education. In the first part of the article, I argue that contemporary concepts of emancipation are explicitly or implicitly related to the idea of the sovereign subject articulated by Kant and other philosophers of the Enlightenment. I contend that our modern enlightened concepts of emancipation rest on a dichotomy between an autonomous and self-sufficient subject and its sociocultural world. Referring to current research in mathematics education, I show how this dichotomy leads to intrinsic contradictions that haunt ongoing educational practices. These contradictions, I contend, are manifested in the hopeless efforts to bridge the gap between the deeds and thoughts of an autonomous individual and the regimes of reason and truth in which the individual finds itself subsumed. In particular, I argue that emancipation as understood in the enlightened modern sense remains a chimeric and unfulfillable dream. In the second part of the article, I suggest that emancipation can still be an orienting vector of educational practice and research, but it needs to be conceptualized differently: emancipation needs not be predicated in terms of individuals’ freedom and individualist autonomy, but in critical–ethical terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Let me attempt a translation here: “Didactic is coextensive with study. There is didactic as long as there is [something to] study. Whether or not there is a ‘teacher’ matters little.”

  2. For an account of postmodern emancipation and its ubiquitous link to the project of the Enlightenment, see, for instance, Rancière (1987) and Bingham and Biesta (2010).

  3. Yet, the point is very easy to overlook. Thus, Lather, in her attempt at deconstructing the subject of emancipation, depicts this subject as follows: “she is both victimized and capable of agency; while she has something approximating false consciousness, that consciousness is unified and capable of Freirean conscientization, knowing the world in order to set herself free from it” (1991, p. 141). The point is not to set yourself free from the world. For cultural–historical approaches, emancipation is not about being freed environmentally.

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (2001). Kant’s critique of pure reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958a). The modern concept of history. The Review of Politics, 20(4), 570–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958b). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, E. (2000). The promise of uncertainty: Education, postmodernism and the politics of possibility. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 10(1), 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldino, R., & Cabral, T. (1998). Lacan and the school’s credit system. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education vol. 22 (pp. 56–63). Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaud, M. (2004). A history of capitalism. Delhi: Aakar Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, C., & Biesta, G. (2010). Jacques Rancière. Education, truth, emancipation. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2008). Lacan, subjectivity, and the task of mathematics education research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(3), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2010). Truth and the renewal of knowledge: The case of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(3), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1996). L’étranger [The stranger]. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavafy, C. (1976). The complete poems of Cavafy. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard, Y. (1997). Familière et problématique, la figure du professeur [Familiar and enigmatic, the figure of the teacher]. Recherche en Didactique des Mathématiques, 17(3), 17–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, R. F. (1972). Autonomy and education. In R. F. Dearden, P. H. Hirst, & R. S. Peters (Eds.), Education and the development of reason. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donham, D. L. (1999). History, power, ideology: Central issues in marxism and anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1991). La société des individus [The society of individuals]. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses [The order of things]. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). New York: Pantheon.

  • Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of indignation. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1961). Marx’s concept of man. New York: Frederick Ungar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1987). Schooling and the politics of ethics: Beyond liberal and conservative discourses. Journal of Education, 169(2), 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1989). Schooling as a form of cultural politics: Towards a pedagogy of and for difference. In H. Giroux & P. McLaren (Eds.), Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle (pp. 125–151). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. (1978). The phenomenology of spirit. Consciousness. In M. J. Petry (Ed.), Hegel’s philosophy of subjective spirit. Vol. 3: Phenomenology and psychology (pp. 3–77). Dordrecht: D. Reider.

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford University Press.

  • Howe, C. (2009). The role of the teacher in the transformation of knowledge in classroom interaction. In M. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 93–104). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacotot, J. (1829). Mathématiques [Mathematics]. http://www.joseph-jacotot.com/article-4882861.html. Accessed 28 May 2011.

  • Kanes, C. (2009). Governmentality as a fourth purpose of mathematics assessment. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 229–236). Thessaloniki: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1836). The metaphysics of ethics (J. W. Semple, Trans.). Edinburgh: Hamilton, Adams, & Co. (Original work published 1780)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits [Writings]. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, E. (2006). Totalité et infini. Essai sur l’exteriorité [Totality and infinity. An essay on exteriority]. Paris: Le livre de poche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (1963). The meaning of contemporary realism. London: Merlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (1995). Michel Foucault: Governmentality and liberal education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 14, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (1996). Michel Foucault: Personal autonomy and education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2004). The educational inadequacy of conceptions of self in educational psychology. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 35, 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1970). A contribution to the critique of political economy (S. W. Ryazanskaya, Trans., M. Dobb, Ed.) New York: International Publishers.

  • Marx, K. (1998). The German ideology, including theses on Feuerbach and introduction to the critique of political economy. New York: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mészáros, I. (2010). Social structure and forms of consciousness. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M. (2005). Foucault, educational research and the issue of autonomy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(3), 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A. (2011). Mathematics education and the political: An ideology critique of an educational research field. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg, Denmark: Department of Learning and Philosophy. Aalborg University.

  • Pais, A. (2012). A Critique of ideology on the issue of transfer. Educational Studies in Mathematics (in press)

  • Peters, M. (2002). Governamentalidade neoliberal e educacao [Neoliberal governmentality and education]. In T. da Silva (Ed.), O sujeito da educaçao. Estudos foucaultianos [The subject of education. Foucauldian studies] (pp. 211–224). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. The future of education. New York: Grossman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (2004). The moral judgment of the child (M. Gabain, Trans.). Glencoe: The Free Press. (Original work published 1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. (2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 215–234). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L., Miranda, I., & Guzmán, J. (2008). Relative motion, graphs and the heteroglossic transformation of meanings: A semiotic analysis. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 30th North American Chapter (Vol. 4, pp. 161–168). Morelia: Cinvestav-UMSNH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). Intercorporeality and ethical commitment: An activity perspective on classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1987). Le maître ignorant [The ignorant schoolmaster]. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural historical perspective on teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Russon, J. (2010). Making a home for freedom: From agency to empire. (Excerpt from: Sites of exposure: A philosophical essay on politics, art, and the nature of experience, forthcoming). Paper presented at Laurentian University Culture and Thought Seminar, November 17, 2010.

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1943). L’être et le néant [Being and nothingness]. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valero, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (Eds.). (2004). Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1997). Redefining the subject in situated cognition theory. In D. Kirshner, & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition (pp. 57–70). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshaw, M. (2004). The pedagogical relations in postmodern times. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 121–139). Greenwich: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is a result of a research program funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC/CRSH). I am most grateful to the three reviewers and the editors for their comments on a previous version of this paper. I would like to thank Steve Lerman for his thoughtful reaction to my paper during the Mathematics Education and Contemporary Theory Manchester Conference. My special thanks to Paola Valero for her suggestions in the final preparation of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Radford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radford, L. Education and the illusions of emancipation. Educ Stud Math 80, 101–118 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9380-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9380-8

Keywords

Navigation