Abstract
In this article, I deal with the question of emancipation in education. In the first part of the article, I argue that contemporary concepts of emancipation are explicitly or implicitly related to the idea of the sovereign subject articulated by Kant and other philosophers of the Enlightenment. I contend that our modern enlightened concepts of emancipation rest on a dichotomy between an autonomous and self-sufficient subject and its sociocultural world. Referring to current research in mathematics education, I show how this dichotomy leads to intrinsic contradictions that haunt ongoing educational practices. These contradictions, I contend, are manifested in the hopeless efforts to bridge the gap between the deeds and thoughts of an autonomous individual and the regimes of reason and truth in which the individual finds itself subsumed. In particular, I argue that emancipation as understood in the enlightened modern sense remains a chimeric and unfulfillable dream. In the second part of the article, I suggest that emancipation can still be an orienting vector of educational practice and research, but it needs to be conceptualized differently: emancipation needs not be predicated in terms of individuals’ freedom and individualist autonomy, but in critical–ethical terms.

Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Let me attempt a translation here: “Didactic is coextensive with study. There is didactic as long as there is [something to] study. Whether or not there is a ‘teacher’ matters little.”
Yet, the point is very easy to overlook. Thus, Lather, in her attempt at deconstructing the subject of emancipation, depicts this subject as follows: “she is both victimized and capable of agency; while she has something approximating false consciousness, that consciousness is unified and capable of Freirean conscientization, knowing the world in order to set herself free from it” (1991, p. 141). The point is not to set yourself free from the world. For cultural–historical approaches, emancipation is not about being freed environmentally.
References
Adorno, T. W. (2001). Kant’s critique of pure reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Arendt, H. (1958a). The modern concept of history. The Review of Politics, 20(4), 570–590.
Arendt, H. (1958b). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Atkinson, E. (2000). The promise of uncertainty: Education, postmodernism and the politics of possibility. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 10(1), 81–89.
Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Baldino, R., & Cabral, T. (1998). Lacan and the school’s credit system. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education vol. 22 (pp. 56–63). Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch: PME.
Beaud, M. (2004). A history of capitalism. Delhi: Aakar Books.
Bingham, C., & Biesta, G. (2010). Jacques Rancière. Education, truth, emancipation. London: Continuum.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Brown, T. (2008). Lacan, subjectivity, and the task of mathematics education research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(3), 249–263.
Brown, T. (2010). Truth and the renewal of knowledge: The case of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(3), 329–343.
Camus, A. (1996). L’étranger [The stranger]. Paris: Gallimard.
Cavafy, C. (1976). The complete poems of Cavafy. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chevallard, Y. (1997). Familière et problématique, la figure du professeur [Familiar and enigmatic, the figure of the teacher]. Recherche en Didactique des Mathématiques, 17(3), 17–54.
Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 87–103.
Dearden, R. F. (1972). Autonomy and education. In R. F. Dearden, P. H. Hirst, & R. S. Peters (Eds.), Education and the development of reason. London: Routledge.
Donham, D. L. (1999). History, power, ideology: Central issues in marxism and anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Elias, N. (1991). La société des individus [The society of individuals]. Paris: Fayard.
Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses [The order of things]. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things. New York: Vintage.
Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of indignation. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm.
Fromm, E. (1961). Marx’s concept of man. New York: Frederick Ungar.
Giroux, H. (1987). Schooling and the politics of ethics: Beyond liberal and conservative discourses. Journal of Education, 169(2), 9–33.
Giroux, H. (1989). Schooling as a form of cultural politics: Towards a pedagogy of and for difference. In H. Giroux & P. McLaren (Eds.), Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle (pp. 125–151). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hegel, G. (1978). The phenomenology of spirit. Consciousness. In M. J. Petry (Ed.), Hegel’s philosophy of subjective spirit. Vol. 3: Phenomenology and psychology (pp. 3–77). Dordrecht: D. Reider.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford University Press.
Howe, C. (2009). The role of the teacher in the transformation of knowledge in classroom interaction. In M. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 93–104). London: Routledge.
Jacotot, J. (1829). Mathématiques [Mathematics]. http://www.joseph-jacotot.com/article-4882861.html. Accessed 28 May 2011.
Kanes, C. (2009). Governmentality as a fourth purpose of mathematics assessment. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 229–236). Thessaloniki: PME.
Kant, I. (1836). The metaphysics of ethics (J. W. Semple, Trans.). Edinburgh: Hamilton, Adams, & Co. (Original work published 1780)
Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits [Writings]. New York: Norton.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 133–150.
Lévinas, E. (2006). Totalité et infini. Essai sur l’exteriorité [Totality and infinity. An essay on exteriority]. Paris: Le livre de poche.
Lukács, G. (1963). The meaning of contemporary realism. London: Merlin.
Marshall, J. (1995). Michel Foucault: Governmentality and liberal education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 14, 23–34.
Marshall, J. (1996). Michel Foucault: Personal autonomy and education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Martin, J. (2004). The educational inadequacy of conceptions of self in educational psychology. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 35, 185–208.
Marx, K. (1970). A contribution to the critique of political economy (S. W. Ryazanskaya, Trans., M. Dobb, Ed.) New York: International Publishers.
Marx, K. (1998). The German ideology, including theses on Feuerbach and introduction to the critique of political economy. New York: Prometheus.
Mészáros, I. (2010). Social structure and forms of consciousness. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Olssen, M. (2005). Foucault, educational research and the issue of autonomy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(3), 365–387.
Pais, A. (2011). Mathematics education and the political: An ideology critique of an educational research field. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg, Denmark: Department of Learning and Philosophy. Aalborg University.
Pais, A. (2012). A Critique of ideology on the issue of transfer. Educational Studies in Mathematics (in press)
Peters, M. (2002). Governamentalidade neoliberal e educacao [Neoliberal governmentality and education]. In T. da Silva (Ed.), O sujeito da educaçao. Estudos foucaultianos [The subject of education. Foucauldian studies] (pp. 211–224). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.
Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. The future of education. New York: Grossman.
Piaget, J. (2004). The moral judgment of the child (M. Gabain, Trans.). Glencoe: The Free Press. (Original work published 1932)
Popkewitz, T. (2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 3–34.
Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 215–234). Rotterdam: Sense.
Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126.
Radford, L., Miranda, I., & Guzmán, J. (2008). Relative motion, graphs and the heteroglossic transformation of meanings: A semiotic analysis. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 30th North American Chapter (Vol. 4, pp. 161–168). Morelia: Cinvestav-UMSNH.
Radford, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). Intercorporeality and ethical commitment: An activity perspective on classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 227–245.
Rancière, J. (1987). Le maître ignorant [The ignorant schoolmaster]. Paris: Fayard.
Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural historical perspective on teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense.
Russon, J. (2010). Making a home for freedom: From agency to empire. (Excerpt from: Sites of exposure: A philosophical essay on politics, art, and the nature of experience, forthcoming). Paper presented at Laurentian University Culture and Thought Seminar, November 17, 2010.
Sartre, J.-P. (1943). L’être et le néant [Being and nothingness]. Paris: Gallimard.
Valero, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (Eds.). (2004). Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
Walkerdine, V. (1997). Redefining the subject in situated cognition theory. In D. Kirshner, & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition (pp. 57–70). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Walshaw, M. (2004). The pedagogical relations in postmodern times. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 121–139). Greenwich: Information Age.
Acknowledgments
This article is a result of a research program funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC/CRSH). I am most grateful to the three reviewers and the editors for their comments on a previous version of this paper. I would like to thank Steve Lerman for his thoughtful reaction to my paper during the Mathematics Education and Contemporary Theory Manchester Conference. My special thanks to Paola Valero for her suggestions in the final preparation of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radford, L. Education and the illusions of emancipation. Educ Stud Math 80, 101–118 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9380-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9380-8