Abstract
Using cultural–historical activity theory as my framework, I report an empirical study of how electrician apprentices learn to bend electrical conduits in college and on the job. The requirements for doing well in the two locations are very different: exhibiting knowledge of trigonometry, on the one hand, and doing a good job that makes bending and subsequent pulling of wires practical. Formal trigonometry is the reference in the classroom, whereas rules of practice are the main references on the job. In each case, the practices orient themselves to the Canadian codebook, which provides a description that the inspector uses as his/her reference when checking for approval. However, the sharp differences between the two forms of practice and the contradictions arising from them are reintegrated into the stories that are constitutive of the community of practice. Implications are discussed with respect to the concept of “boundary crossing” through the lens of cultural–historical activity theory and its concepts for the development of the individual: subjectification, which describes the changes within an activity system (school, work) and personality, the changes the individual undergoes as he/she moves repeatedly between systems of activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2003). Radii of bends in raceways, Rule 12-922(1) and Table 7. Retrieved 15 September 2010 from www.electrical-contractor.net/Forum/International/Subject2914.PDF.
Cox, R. A. (1982). Electricians guide to conduit bending. Spokane, WA: Pend Oreille.
Coy, M. W. (Ed.). (1989). Apprenticeship: From theory to method and back again. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Emad, G., & Roth, W.-M. (2008). Contradictions in practices of training for and assessment of competency: A case study from the maritime domain. Education and Training, 50, 260–272.
Greenlee Textron. (1998). Instruction manual: Site-rite hand benders 840, 841, 842, 843, 840H, 841H and 842H AND Site-Rite II handbenders 8840, 8841, 8842, 8843, 8840H, 8841H, and 8842H. Rockford, IL: Greenlee Textron.
Henry, M. (2005). Voir l’invisible: Sur Kandinsky [Seeing the invisible: On Kandinsky]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Holzkamp, K. (1993). Lernen: Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung [Learning: A subject-scientific foundation]. Frankfurt: Campus.
Knight, P. S. (2002). Electrical code simplified: Residential. Sechelt, BC: Author.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Y. J., & Roth, W.-M. (2004). They’ve gotta learn something unless they’re just out to lunch: Becoming an expert in a salmon hatchery. Anthropology of Work Review, XXV(1–2), 15–21.
Lee, Y.-J., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Learning about workplace learning and expertise from Jack: A discourse analytic study. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14, 205–219.
Lee, Y. J., & Roth, W.-M. (2007). The individual|collective dialectic in the learning organization. The Learning Organization, 14, 92–107.
Leontjew, A. N. (1982). Tätigkeit, Bewusstsein, Persönlichkeit [Activity, consciousness, personality]. Köln: Pahl-Rugenstein.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1962). Werke Band 23: Das Kapital. Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band [Works vol. 23: Capital. Critique of political economy]. Berlin: Dietz.
Nancy, J.-L. (1993). Éloge de la mêlée [In praise of the mêlée]. Transeuropéenne, 1, 8–18.
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). The visibility of meanings: Modelling the mathematics of banking. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1, 3–31.
Racca, R., Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W.-M. (2000). Learning scientific practices in the electrical trade: Implications for educational programs. Paper presented at the 2000 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved 15 September 2010 from www.educ.uvic.ca/faculty/mroth/conferences/CONF2000/RACCA3.pdf.
Rancière, J. (1999). Dis-agreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Roth, W.-M. (2005). Mathematical inscriptions and the reflexive elaboration of understanding: An ethnography of graphing and numeracy in a fish hatchery. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7, 75–109.
Roth, W.-M. (2012). Apprenticeship: Toward a reflexive method for researching “education in ‘non-formal’ settings”. In S. Delamont (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 195–208). Camberley: Edward Elgar.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (2001). Of disciplined minds and disciplined bodies. Qualitative Sociology, 24, 459–481.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232.
Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Saxe, G. B. (1991). Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schliemann, A. D., & Acioly, N. M. (1989). Mathematical knowledge developed at work: The contribution of practice versus the contribution of schooling. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 185–221.
Scribner, S. (1986). Thinking in action: Some characteristics of practical thought. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 13–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 53–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roth, WM. Rules of bending, bending the rules: the geometry of electrical conduit bending in college and workplace. Educ Stud Math 86, 177–192 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9376-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9376-4