# Fine grain assessment of students’ mathematical understanding: participatory and anticipatory stagesin learning a new mathematical conception

- 507 Downloads
- 15 Citations

## Abstract

This study addressed a twofold problem – the soundness of a theoretical stage-distinction regarding the process of constructing a new (to the learner) mathematical conception and how such distinction contributes to fine grain assessment of students’ mathematical understandings. As a context for the study served the difficult-to-grasp concept of ‘inverse’ order relationship among unit fractions, that is, the larger the number of parts the smaller the size of each part (e.g., 1/7 > 1/10 although 10 > 7). I conducted this study as a whole-class teaching experiment in a third grade classroom at a public school in Israel. The qualitative analysis of tasks presented to students and students’ responses to those tasks, as well as a quantitative measurement of percents of student responses to assessment questions, indicated that the distinction between a participatory and an anticipatory stage is sound and useful in guiding the teacher’s selection of tasks to assess/teach students’ mathematical thinking. In particular, this analysis demonstrates that in a classroom where the vast majority of students *appear* to understand a new concept, a substantial portion of the class – those who formed the new conception only at the participatory stage – may be at risk of being left behind. This study also highlights a new way of organizing assessment to minimize such unfortunate situations, including three levels of assessment rigor a teacher can use in regular classroom settings.

## Keywords

Anticipation Activity-effect relationship Assessment Children’s conceptions Constructivist theory Fractions Problem situations Tasks Teaching activities Teaching experiment## Notes

### Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the US *National Academy of Education-The Spencer Foundation*. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.

## References

- Australian Council of Deans of Education 2001.
*New learning: A charter for Australian education*. Canberra, Australia (available at http://www.jennylittle.com/Resources/CharterforAustralianEd.pdf). - Balacheff, N. (1990). Towards a problématique for research on mathematics teaching.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21*(4), 258–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1992). Rational number, ratio, and proportion. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.),
*Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 296–333). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar - Behr, M. J., Wachsmuth, I., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1984). Order and equivalence of rational numbers: A clinical teaching experiment.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15*, 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Brousseau, G. (1997).
*Theory of didactical situations in mathematics (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland and V. Warfield, Trans.)*. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.),
*Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education*(pp. 307–333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Confrey, J. (1990).
*Splitting, similarity, and rate of change: A new approach to multiplication and exponential functions*. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA. (April)Google Scholar - Confrey, J. (1994). Splitting, similarity, and rate of change: A new approach to multiplication and exponential functions. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.),
*The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics*(pp. 291–330). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar - Confrey, J. (1998).
*Building mathematical structure within a conjecture driven teaching experiment on splitting*. In S. Berenson, K. Dawkins. M. L. Blanton, W. Coulombe, J. Kolb, K. S. Norwood & L. Stiff (Eds.),*Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (Vol. 1)*, (pp. 39–50). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar - Dewey, J. (1933).
*How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process*. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar - Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.),
*Advanced mathematical thinking*(pp. 95–123). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Gravemeijer, K. (1994).
*Developing realistic mathematics education*. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.Google Scholar - Kamii, C., & Clark, F. B. (1995). Equivalent fractions: Their difficulty and educational implications.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14*, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kieren, T. E. (1993).
*The learning of fractions: Maturing in a fraction world*. Athens, GA: Working Group on Fraction Learning and Instruction. (January)Google Scholar - Lompscher, J. (2002). The category of activity as a principal constituent of cultural–historical psychology. In D. Robbins & A. Stetsenko (Eds.),
*Voices within Vygotsky’s non-classical psychology: Past, present, future*(pp. 79–99). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000).
*Principles and standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar - Olive, J. (1993). Children’s construction of fractional schemes in computer microworlds, Part II: Constructing multiplicative operations with fractions.
*The 71st annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics*, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar - Olive, J. (1999). From fractions to rational numbers of arithmetic: A reorganization hypothesis.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1*, 279–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Olive, J. (2003). Nathan’s strategies for simplifying and adding fractions in third grade. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty & J. Zilliox (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3)*(pp. 421–428). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar - Piaget, J. (1971).
*Biology and knowledge*(B. Walsh, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar - Piaget, J. (1985).
*The equilibration of cognitive structures: The problem of intellectual development*(T. Brown and K.J. Thampy, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar - Piaget, J. (2001).
*Studies in reflecting abstraction*(R.L. Campbell, Trans.). Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar - Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1960).
*The child’s conception of geometry*(E.A. Lunzer, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar - Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieren, T. E. (1992). Creating constructivist environments and constructing creative mathematics.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23*, 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieren, T. E. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it?
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26*(2–3), 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pitkethly, A., & Hunting, R. P. (1996). A review of recent research in the area of initial fraction concepts.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30*(1), 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22*(4), 405–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26*, 114–145.Google Scholar - Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6*(2), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Simon, M. A., Tzur, R., Heinz, K., & Kinzel, M. (2004). Explicating a mechanism for conceptual learning: Elaborating the construct of reflective abstraction.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35*(3), 305–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Steffe, L. P. (1993).
*Children’s construction of iterative fraction schemes*. Seattle, Washington: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (April)Google Scholar - Steffe, L. P. (1994). Children’s multiplying schemes. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.),
*The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics*(pp. 3–39). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar - Steffe, L. P. (2002). A new hypothesis concerning children’s fractional knowledge.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20*, 1–41.Google Scholar - Steffe, L. P., & Cobb, P. (1988).
*Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies*. New York: Springer.Google Scholar - Steffe, L. P., von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., & Cobb, P. (1983).
*Children’s counting types*(1st ed.). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar - Steffe, L. P., & Wiegel, H. G. (1992). On reforming practice in mathematics education.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23*, 445–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),
*Handbook of qualitative research*(pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar - Streefland, L. (1991).
*Fractions in realistic mathematics education: A paradigm of developmental research*. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - The Royal Ministry of Education, Research, and Church Affairs (1999).
*The curriculum for the 10-year compulsory school in Norway (L97)*. Oslo, Norway: Author.Google Scholar - Tzur, R. (1996).
*Interaction and children’s fraction learning, UMI dissertation services*(Bell & Howell). Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar - Tzur, R. (1999). An integrated study of children’s construction of improper fractions and the teacher’s role in promoting that learning.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30*(4), 390–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tzur, R. (2000). An integrated research on children’s construction of meaningful, symbolic, partitioning-related conceptions, and the teacher’s role in fostering that learning.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18*(2), 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tzur, R. (2004). Teacher and students’ joint production of a reversible fraction conception.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23*, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tzur, R., & Simon, M. A. (2004). Distinguishing two stages of mathematics conceptual learning.
*International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2*, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tzur, R., Simon, M. A., Heinz, K., & Kinzel, M. (2001). An account of a teacher’s perspective on learning and teaching mathematics: Implications for teacher development.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4*(3), 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - von Glasersfeld, E. (1995).
*Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning*. Washington, D.C.: Falmer.Google Scholar - Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).
*Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar