Abstract
Arithmetic word problems are a staple in mathematical curricula yet give individuals of all ages difficulty. Successful word problem solving requires translating the problem into a symbolic arithmetic format. However, the linguistic component may make problem solving more complex and increase cognitive load, specifically the processes that interact with reading comprehension, such as working memory and inhibitory control. This comprehensive review examines the overall relationship between comprehension and word problem success, and how different linguistic factors and related cognitive processes impact word problem performance. We highlight the importance of cognitive processes by proposing models that spotlight the roles of inhibitory control and working memory in word problem performance. Furthermore, we emphasize the need for researchers and practitioners to rethink the strategies that are utilized in the development of word problem-solving skills.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1403_2
Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 30–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30
Alibali, M. W., Knuth, E. J., Hattikudur, S., McNeil, N. M., & Stephens, A. C. (2007). A longitudinal examination of middle school students’ understanding of the equal sign and equivalent equations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060701360902
Awofala, A. O. (2016). Effect of personalisation of instruction on students’ motivation to learn mathematics word problems in Nigeria. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 7(3), 486–486. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.267339
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359
Barbu, O. C., & Beal, C. R. (2010). Effects of linguistic complexity and math difficulty on word problem solving by English learners. International. Journal of Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v2i2.508
Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The effects of instruction on children’s understanding of the “equals” sign. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1086/461356
Barrouillet, P., Camos, V., Perruchet, P., & Seron, X. (2004). Adapt: A developmental, asemantic, and procedural model for transcoding from verbal to Arabic numerals. Psychological Review, 111(2), 368–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.111.2.368
Bassok, M. (2001). Semantic alignments in mathematical word problems. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 401–433). MIT Press.
Bassok, M., Chase, V. M., & Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Alignment of semantic and formal knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 99–134. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0675
Bassok, M., Pedigo, S. F., & Oskarsson, A. T. (2008). Priming addition facts with semantic relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.343
Bassok, M., Wu, L. L., & Olseth, K. L. (1995). Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer. Memory & Cognition, 23(3), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197236
Bjork, I. M., & Bowyer-Crane, C. (2013). Cognitive skills used to solve mathematical word problems and numerical operations: A study of 6- to 7-year-old children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1345–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0169-7
Boonen, A. J. H., Koning, B. B. D., Jolles, J., & Schoot, M. V. D. (2016). Word problem solving in contemporary math education: A plea for reading comprehension skills training. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00191
Boonen, A. J. H., van der Schoot, M., van Wesel, F., de Vries, M. H., & Jolles, J. (2013). What underlies successful word problem solving? A path analysis in sixth grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.05.001
Briars, D. J., & Larkin, J. H. (1984). An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 1(3), 245–296. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0103_1
Burkhardt, H. (1994). Mathematical applications in school curriculum. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 3621–3624). Pergamon Press.
Busse, A. (2005). Individual ways of dealing with the context of realistic tasks—First steps towards a typology. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 37(5), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-005-0023-3
Callejo, M. L., & Vila, A. (2009). Approach to mathematical problem solving and students’ belief systems: Two case studies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9195-z
Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90075-2
Campbell, J. I. D., & Clark, J. M. (1992). Chapter 12 cognitive number processing: An encoding-complex perspective. The Nature and Origins of Mathematical Skills, 457–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)60894-8
Campbell, J. I. D., & Epp, L. J. (2005). Architectures for arithmetic. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 347–360). Psychology Press.
Carpenter, T. P., Corbitt, M. K., Kepner, H. S., Lindquist, M. M., & Reys, R. E. (1980). Solving verbal problems: Results and implications from national assessment. The Arithmetic Teacher, 28(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.5951/at.28.1.0008
Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1982). The development of addition and subtraction problem-solving skills. In P. T (Ed.), addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 9–24). Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003046585-2
Chan, W. W., & Kwan, J. L. (2021). Pathways to word problem solving: The mediating roles of schema construction and mathematical vocabulary. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101963
Chapman, O. (2006). Classroom practices for context of mathematics word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-7834-1
Clement, J., Lochhead, J., & Soloway, E. (1979). Translating between symbol systems: Isolating a common difficulty in solving algebra word problems (TR 79-19). University of Massachusetts, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Cognitive Development Project.
Cummins, D. D. (1991). Childrens interpretations of arithmetic word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 8(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0803_2
Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 405–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(88)90011-4
Damian, M. F. (2004). Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words. Memory & Cognition, 32(1), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195829
Daroczy, G., Meurers, D., Heller, J., Wolska, M., & Nürk, H.-C. (2020). The interaction of linguistic and arithmetic factors affects adult performance on arithmetic word problems. Cognitive Processing, 21(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00948-5
Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 06. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
Davis-Dorsey, J., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1991). The role of rewording and context personalization in the solving of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.61
De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). The effect of semantic structure on first graders’ strategies for solving addition and subtraction word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(5), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.18.5.0363
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & de Win, L. (1985). Influence of rewording verbal problems on children’s problem representations and solutions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.4.460
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Depaepe, F. (2008). Unraveling the relationship between students’ mathematics-related beliefs and the classroom culture. European Psychologist, 13(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.1.24
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Pauwels, A. (1990). Influence of the semantic structure of word problems on second graders’ eye movements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.359
DeCaro, M. S., Van Stockum, C. A., & Wieth, M. B. (2016). When higher working memory capacity hinders insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000152
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1-2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-n
Dehaene, S., & Akhavein, R. (1995). Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.314
Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers’ approaches towards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.016
Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2014). Students’ non-realistic mathematical modeling as a drawback of teachers’ beliefs about and approaches to word problem solving (pp. 137–156). From Beliefs to Dynamic Affect Systems in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06808-4_7
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Dowker, A., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2016). Editorial: Linguistic influences on mathematics. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01035
Feola, B., Sand, L., Atkins, S., Bunting, M., Dougherty, M., & Bolger, D. J. (2023). Overlapping and unique brain responses to cognitive and response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 166, 105958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2023.105958
Fias, W. (2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Psychological Research, 65(4), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260100065
Fias, W., Reynvoet, B., & Brysbaert, M. (2001). Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task? Psychological Research, 65(4), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260100064
Friso-van den Bos, I., van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Luit, J. E. H. (2013). Working memory and mathematics in primary school children: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 10, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.003
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Hamlett, C. L., & Wang, A. Y. (2015). Is word-problem solving a form of text comprehension? Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1005745
Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2019). Addressing the role of working memory in mathematical word-problem solving when designing intervention for struggling learners. ZDM, 52(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01070-8
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., & Craddock, C. (2019). Improving language comprehension to enhance word-problem solving. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1666760
Fuchs, L. S., Gilbert, J. K., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., & N Martin, B. L. (2017). Text comprehension and oral language as predictors of word-problem solving: Insights into word-problem solving as a form of text comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1398259
Fuchs, L. S., Seethaler, P. M., Sterba, S. K., Craddock, C., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Geary, D. C., & Changas, P. (2021). Closing the word-problem achievement gap in first grade: Schema-based word-problem intervention with embedded language comprehension instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000467
Fuchs, L. S., Zumeta, R. O., Schumacher, R. F., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (2010). The effects of schema-broadening instruction on second graders’ word-problem performance and their ability to represent word problems with algebraic equations: A randomized control study. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1086/651191
Gamo, S., Sander, E., & Richard, J.-F. (2010). Transfer of strategy use by semantic recoding in arithmetic problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.001
Gasco, J., Villarroel, J. D., & Zuazagoitia, D. (2014). Different procedures for solving mathematical word problems in high school. International Education Studies, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p77
Gerofsky, S. (2009). Genre, simulacra, impossible exchange, and the real: How postmodern theory problematizes word problems. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren, & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 21–38). Sense.
Gibson, E., & Warren, T. (2004). Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax, 7(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-0005.2004.00065.x
Goulet-Lyle, M.-P., Voyer, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2019). How does imposing a step-by-step solution method impact students’ approach to mathematical word problem solving? ZDM, 52(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01098-w
Gros, H., Sander, E., & Thibaut, J.-P. (2019). When masters of abstraction run into a concrete wall: Experts failing arithmetic word problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1738–1746. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01628-3
Gros, H., Thibaut, J.-P., & Sander, E. (2020). Semantic congruence in arithmetic: A new conceptual model for word problem solving. Educational Psychologist, 55(2), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1691004
Gros, H., Thibaut, J.-P., & Sander, E. (2021). What we count dictates how we count: A tale of two encodings. Cognition, 212, 104665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104665
Haghverdi, M., & Wiest, L. R. (2016). The effect of contextual and conceptual rewording on mathematical problem-solving performance. The Mathematics Educator, 25(1), 56–73.
Hecht, S. A. (2002). Counting on working memory in simple arithmetic when counting is used for problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 30(3), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194945
Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Green, C. E. (1992). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students’ eye fixations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.76
Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Monk, C. A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.18
Heilman, M., Zhao, L., Pino, J., & Eskenazi, M. (2008). Retrieval of reading materials for vocabulary and reading practice. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications - EANL ’08. https://doi.org/10.3115/1631836.1631846
Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem solving: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 242–273. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.23.3.0242
Hendijani, R., Bischak, D. P., Arvai, J., & Dugar, S. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, external reward, and their effect on overall motivation and performance. Human Performance, 29(4), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2016.1157595
Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01284528
Hudson, T. (1983). Correspondences and numerical differences between disjoint sets. Child Development, 54(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129864
Humberstone, J., & Reeve, R. A. (2018). The conceptual overlap between arithmetic and algebraic referential mapping. Learning and Instruction, 54, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.001
Ibarra, C. G., & Lindvall, C. M. (1982). Factors associated with the ability of kindergarten children to solve simple arithmetic story problems. The Journal of Educational Research, 75(3), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1982.10885372
Jaffe, J. B., Gharibani, T., & Bolger, D. J. (2023). “Acquired” Equals addition? associating verbs with arithmetic operations impacts word problem performance. Mind, Brain, and Education, 17(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12355
Jaffe, J., Bolger, D., Gharibani, T., & Nudelman, S. (2021) “2” vs. “Two”: Does the presentation of numbers matter? [Poster Presentation]. 31st Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse.
Jiménez, L. (2012). La Aplicación del conocimiento contextualizado en la Resolución de Problemas Matemáticos un estudio sobre las dificultades de los niños en la resolución de problemas no rutinarios. Cultura y Educación, 24(3), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564012802845640
Jiménez, L., & Ramos, F. J. (2011). El Impacto Negativo del contrato didáctico en la Resolución Realista de problemas. un estudio con alumnos de 2° y 3° de educación primaria. Electronic Journal of Research in Education. Psychology, 9(25), 1155–1182. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v9i25.1499
Jiménez, L., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). Development of children’s solutions of non-standard arithmetic word problem Solving. Journal of Psychodidactics, 19(1), 93–123. https://doi.org/10.1387/revpsicodidact.7865
Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., Haria, P., Leh, J., Adams, A., & Kaduvettoor, A. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.115
Jogi, A.-L., & Kikas, E. (2016). Calculation and word problem-solving skills in primary grades – Impact of cognitive abilities and longitudinal interrelations with task-persistent behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12096
Khng, K. H., & Lee, K. (2009). Inhibiting interference from prior knowledge: Arithmetic intrusions in algebra word problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.01.004
Kikas, E., Mädamürk, K., & Palu, A. (2019). What role do comprehension-oriented learning strategies have in solving math calculation and word problems at the end of middle school? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(S1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12308
Kintsch, W. (1992). A cognitive architecture for comprehension (pp. 143–163). Conceptual and Methodological Issues. https://doi.org/10.1037/10564-006
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.92.1.109
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.363
Kouba, V. L., Brown, C. A., Carpenter, T. P., Lindquist, M. M., Silver, E. A., & Swafford, J. O. (1988). Results of the fourth NAEP assessment of mathematics: Number, operations, and word problems. The Arithmetic Teacher, 35(8), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.5951/at.35.8.0014
Ku, H.-Y., & Sullivan, H. J. (2000). Personalization of mathematics word problems in Taiwan. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02319857
Kyttälä, M., & Björn, P. M. (2014). The role of literacy skills in adolescents’ mathematics word problem performance: Controlling for visuo-spatial ability and mathematics anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.010
Lee, K., Ng, S. F., & Bull, R. (2018). Learning and solving algebra word problems: The roles of relational skills, arithmetic, and executive functioning. Developmental Psychology, 54(9), 1758–1772. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000561
Lee, K., Ng, E. L., & Ng, S. F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive unctioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013843
Lee, K., Ng, S.-F., Ng, E.-L., & Lim, Z.-Y. (2004). Working memory and literacy as predictors of performance on algebraic word problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.07.001
Lenzner, T., Kaczmirek, L., & Lenzner, A. (2009). Cognitive burden of survey questions and response times: A psycholinguistic experiment. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(7), 1003–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1602
Lewis, A. B., & Mayer, R. E. (1987). Students’ miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.363
Li, X., Ding, M., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Sources of differences in children’s understandings of mathematical equality: Comparative analysis of teacher guides and student texts in China and the United States. Cognition and Instruction, 26(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000801980845
Lin, X. (2020). Investigating the unique predictors of word-problem solving using meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1097–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09554-w
Littlefield, J., & Rieser, J. J. (1993). Semantic features of similarity and children’s strategies for identifying relevant information in mathematical story problems. Cognition and Instruction, 11(2), 133–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1102_2
Lorenat, J., Arbogast, E., Baer, E., Bazan, C., Bettinger, R., Carpenter, E., Davis, H., Grant, D., Howe, O., Kelley, N., Minier, M., Orozco-Valdivia, N., Peck, A., Saavedra, C., Shiwakoty, S., Sidel, H., Stripp, C., Terrien, J., Wolynski, S., & Yearwood, L. (2020). From carriage wheels to interest rates: The evolution of word problems in algebra textbooks from 1901 to today. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 10(1), 181–213. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.202001.09
Lubin, A., Rossi, S., Lanoë, C., Vidal, J., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2016). Expertise, inhibitory control and arithmetic word problems: A negative priming study in mathematics experts. Learning and Instruction, 45, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.06.004
Lubin, A., Vidal, J., Lanoë, C., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2013). Inhibitory control is needed for the resolution of arithmetic word problems: A developmental negative priming study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032625
Lutz, S., & Huitt, W. (2003). Information processing and memory: Theory and applications. Educational Psychology Interactive (pp. 1–17). Valdosta State University Available online at http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/papers/infoproc.pdf
Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0402_2
Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78(2), 333–368. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.2.70783570r1111t32
Marzocchi, G. M., Lucangeli, D., De Meo, T., Fini, F., & Cornoldi, C. (2002). The disturbing effect of irrelevant information on arithmetic problem solving in inattentive children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 21(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2101_4
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
McNeil, N. (2004). Don’t teach me 2 + 2 equals 4: Knowledge of arithmetic operations hinders equation learning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 26(26), 938–943. Lawrence Erlbaum.
McNeil, N. M. (2008). Limitations to teaching children 2 + 2 = 4: Typical arithmetic problems can hinder learning of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 79(5), 1524–1537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01203.x
McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Knowledge change as a function of mathematics experience: All contexts are not created equal. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0602_6
McNeil, N. M., Rittle-Johnson, B., Hattikudur, S., & Petersen, L. A. (2010). Continuity in representation between children and adults: Arithmetic knowledge hinders undergraduates’ algebraic problem solving. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(4), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.516421
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228
Moeller, K., Zuber, J., Olsen, N., Nuerk, H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2015). Intransparent German number words complicate transcoding -A translingual comparison with Japanese. Frontiers in Psychology, 06. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00740
Moleko, M. M. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on addressing linguistic factors affecting visualisation of mathematics word problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(11). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11248
Múñez, D., Orrantia, J., & Rosales, J. (2013). The effect of external representations on compare word problems: Supporting mental model construction. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.715095
Ng, J., Lee, K., & Khng, K. H. (2017). Irrelevant information in math problems need not be inhibited: Students might just need to spot them. Learning and Individual Differences, 60, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.09.008
Ng, W.-S., Wong, T. T.-Y., & Fong, C. Y.-C. (2021). Contributions of reading comprehension subskills to arithmetic word-problem solving among Chinese primary school students. Journal of Cognition and Development, 22(4), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2021.1916498
Noel, M. P., & Seron, X. (1993). Arabic number reading deficit: A single case study or when 236 is read (2306) and judged superior to 1258. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10(4), 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299308253467
Nunes, T., Dorneles, B. V., Lin, P.-J., & Rathgeb-Schnierer, E. (2016). Teaching and learning about whole numbers in primary school. Topical Surveys, ICME-13, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45113-8_1
Olkun, S., Toluk, Z., & Izzet, A. (2002). Textbooks, word problems, and student success on addition and subtraction. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1501/0003635
Orrantia, J., Múñez, D., Romualdo, S. S., & Verschaffel, L. (2015). Effects of numerical surface form in arithmetic word problems. Psicológica, 36(2), 265–281.
Paas, F. G., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122
Páchová, A., & Vondrová, N. (2021). The effect of semantic cues on the difficulty of word problems and the interplay with other complicating variables. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1867229
Pape, S. J. (2003). Compare word problems: Consistency hypothesis revisited. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 396–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-476x(02)00046-2
Passolunghi, M. C., Cornoldi, C., & De Liberto, S. (1999). Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers. Memory & Cognition, 27(5), 779–790. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198531
Passolunghi, M. C., De Blas, G. D., Carretti, B., Gomez-Veiga, I., Doz, E., & Garcia-Madruga, J. A. (2022). The role of working memory updating, inhibition, fluid intelligence, and reading comprehension in explaining differences between consistent and inconsistent arithmetic word-problem-solving performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 224, 105512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105512
Passolunghi, M. C., Marzocchi, G. M., & Fiorillo, F. (2005). Selective effect of inhibition of literal or numerical irrelevant information in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or arithmetic learning disorder (ALD). Developmental Neuropsychology, 28(3), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2803_1
Passolunghi, M. C., & Pazzaglia, F. (2005). A comparison of updating processes in children good or poor in arithmetic word problem-solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(4), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.03.001
Passolunghi, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Short-term memory, working memory, and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2000.2626
Pearce, D. L., Bruun, F., Skinner, K., & Lopez-Mohler, C. (2013). What teachers say about student difficulties solving mathematical word problems in grades 2-5. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/271
Peng, P., Lin, X., Ünal, Z. E., Lee, K., Namkung, J., Chow, J., & Sales, A. (2020). Examining the mutual relations between language and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(7), 595–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000231
Peng, P., Namkung, J., Barnes, M., & Sun, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000079
Pongsakdi, N., Kajamies, A., Veermans, K., Lertola, K., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2019). What makes mathematical word problem solving challenging? Exploring the roles of word problem characteristics, text comprehension, and arithmetic skills. ZDM, 52(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01118-9
Powell, S. R., Berry, K. A., & Barnes, M. A. (2019). The role of pre-algebraic reasoning within a word-problem intervention for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. ZDM, 52(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01093-1
Powell, S. R., Berry, K. A., & Benz, S. A. (2020). Analyzing the word-problem performance and strategies of students experiencing mathematics difficulty. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100759
Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2018). Effective word-problem instruction: Using schemas to facilitate mathematical reasoning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918777250
Powell, S. R., Namkung, J. M., & Lin, X. (2022). An investigation of using keywords to solve word problems. The Elementary School Journal, 122(3), 452–473. https://doi.org/10.1086/717888
Prather, R., & Alibali, M. W. (2011). Children’s acquisition of arithmetic principles: The role of experience. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12(3), 332–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.542214
Reusser, K. (1989). Textual and situational factors in solving mathematical word problems. University of Bern.
Reusser, K. (1990). From text to situation to equation: Cognitive simulation of understanding and solving mathematical word problems. In H. Mandl, E. De Corte, N. Bennet, & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Learning and instruction: European research in an international context (Vol. II, pp. 477–498). Pergamon Press.
Reusser, K., & Stebler, R. (1997). Every word problem has a solution—The social rationality of mathematical modeling in schools. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(97)00014-5
Reynvoet, B., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Cross-notation number priming investigated at different stimulus onset asynchronies in parity and naming tasks. Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.2.81
Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5(1), 49–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0501_2
Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children’s problem solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsberg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking. Academic Press.
Rosales, J., Vicente, S., Chamoso, J. M., Muñez, D., & Orrantia, J. (2012). Teacher–student interaction in joint word problem solving. The role of situational and mathematical knowledge in mainstream classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.007
Schlager, S., Kaulvers, J., & Büchter, A. (2017). Effects of linguistic variations of word problems on the achievement in high stakes tests. [Paper presentation]. 10th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
Schoen, R. C., Champagne, Z., Whitacre, I., & McCrackin, S. (2021). Comparing the frequency and variation of additive word problems in United States first-grade textbooks in the 1980s and the Common Core era. School Science and Mathematics, 121(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12447
Schumacher, R. F., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). Does understanding relational terminology mediate effects of intervention on compare word problems? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(4), 607–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.12.001
Seifi, M., Haghverdi, M., & Azizmohamadi, F. (2012). Recognition of students’ difficulties in solving mathematical word problems from the viewpoint of teachers. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research., 2(3), 2923–2928.
Shum, H. Y., & Chan, W. W. (2020). Young children’s inhibition of keyword heuristic in solving arithmetic word problems. Human Behaviour and Brain. https://doi.org/10.37716/hbab.2020010202
Simmons, F. R., & Singleton, C. (2008). Do weak phonological representations impact on arithmetic development? A review of research into arithmetic and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 14(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.341
Simon, H. A. (1978). Information-processing theory of human problem solving. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (pp. 271–295). Erlbaum.
Simon, H. A. (1979). Information processing models of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 30(1), 363–396. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002051
Spiegel, J. A., Goodrich, J. M., Morris, B. M., Osborne, C. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2021). Relations between executive functions and academic outcomes in elementary school children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000322
Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90155-5
Stern, E. (1993). What makes certain arithmetic word problems involving the comparison of sets so difficult for children? Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.7
Stern, E., & Lehrndorfer, A. (1992). The role of situational context in solving word problems. Cognitive Development, 7(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(92)90014-i
Stevens, E. A., & Powell, S. R. (2015). Focus on inclusive education: Unpacking word problems for diverse learners: A guide to using schemas. Childhood Education, 92(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2016.1134253
Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(00)00052-4
Swanson, H. L. (2006). Cross-sectional and incremental changes in working memory and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.265
Swanson, H. L., Jerman, O., & Zheng, X. (2008). Growth in working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 343–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.343
Swanson, H. L., Lussier, C. M., & Orosco, M. J. (2013). Cognitive strategies, working memory, and growth in word problem solving in children with math difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413498771
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Thevenot, C. (2010). Arithmetic word problem solving: Evidence for the construction of a mental model. Acta Psychologica, 133(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.10.004
Thevenot, C. (2017). Arithmetic word problem solving: The role of prior knowledge (pp. 47–66). Acquisition of Complex Arithmetic Skills and Higher-Order Mathematics Concepts. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-805086-6.00003-5
Tiego, J., Testa, R., Bellgrove, M. A., Pantelis, C., & Whittle, S. (2018). A hierarchical model of inhibitory control. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339
Träff, U., Desoete, A., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2017). Symbolic and non-symbolic number processing in children with developmental dyslexia. Learning and Individual Differences, 56, 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.010
Träff, U., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2015). Mathematical skills in children with dyslexia. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.024
Van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., & Van der Ven, S. H. G. (2021). Why and for whom does personalizing math problems enhance performance? Testing the mediation of enjoyment and cognitive load at different ability levels. Learning and Individual Differences, 87, 101982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101982
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
Van Dooren, W., & Inglis, M. (2015). Inhibitory control in mathematical thinking, learning and problem solving: A survey. ZDM, 47(5), 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0715-2
van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
Verschaffel, L. (1994). Using retelling data to study elementary school children’s representations and solutions of compare problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.25.2.0141
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Swets & Zeitlinger.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2002). Everyday knowledge and mathematical modeling of school word problems. Symbolizing, Modeling and Tool Use in Mathematics Education, 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3194-2_16
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W., Greer, B., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010). Reconceptualising word problems as exercises in mathematical modelling. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-010-0007-x
Vicente, S., & Manchado, E. (2016). Arithmetic word problem solving. Are authentic word problems easier to solve than standard ones? Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39(2), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2016.1138717
Vicente, S., Orrantia, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Influence of situational and conceptual rewording on word problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907x178200
Vicente, S., Orrantia, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). Influence of situational and mathematical information on situational difficult word problems. Studia Psychologica, 50(4), 337–356.
Vicente, S., Verschaffel, L., Sánchez, R., & Múñez, D. (2022). Arithmetic word problem solving. Analysis of Singaporean and Spanish textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111(3), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10169-x
Vilenius-Tuohimaa, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701708228
Vlahović-Štetić, V., Rovan, D., & Mendek, Ž. (2004). The role of students’ age, problem type and situational context in solving mathematical word problems. Review of Psychology, 11(1-2), 25–33.
Vondrová, N., Novotná, J., & Havlíčková, R. (2018). The influence of situational information on pupils’ achievement in additive word problems with several states and transformations. ZDM, 51(1), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0991-8
Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G. T., & Spilich, G. J. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(6), 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90343-6
Voyer, D. (2011). Performance in mathematical problem solving as a function of comprehension and arithmetic skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1073–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9239-y
Walkington, C., Clinton, V., Ritter, S. N., & Nathan, M. J. (2015). How readability and topic incidence relate to performance on mathematics story problems in computer-based curricula. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000036
Walkington, C., Clinton, V., & Shivraj, P. (2017). How readability factors are differentially associated with performance for students of different backgrounds when solving mathematics word problems. American Educational Research Journal, 55(2), 362–414. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217737028
Walkington, C., Clinton, V., & Sparks, A. (2019). The effect of language modification of mathematics story problems on problem-solving in online homework. Instructional Science, 47(5), 499–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09481-6
Wang, A. Y., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2016). Cognitive and linguistic predictors of mathematical word problems with and without irrelevant information. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.015
Wang, Z., Lukowski, S. L., Hart, S. A., Lyons, I. M., Thompson, L. A., Kovas, Y., Mazzocco, M. M., Plomin, R., & Petrill, S. A. (2015). Is math anxiety always bad for math learning? The role of math motivation. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1863–1876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615602471
Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. F. (2012). How working memory capacity affects problem solving. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 185–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-394393-4.00006-6
Wolf, M. K., & Leon, S. (2009). An investigation of the language demands in content assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 14(3-4), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190903425883
Wood, T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1995). Reflections on learning and teaching mathematics in elementary school. In Constructivism in education (pp. 401–422). Chapter, Routledge.
Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489–525.
Xin, Y. P. (2007). Word problem solving tasks in textbooks and their relation to student performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(6), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.100.6.347-360
Xin, Y. P. (2018). The effect of a conceptual model-based approach on ‘additive’ word problem solving of elementary students struggling in mathematics. ZDM, 51(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-1002-9
Zheng, X., Swanson, H. L., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Working memory components as predictors of children’s mathematical word problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jaffe, J.B., Bolger, D.J. Cognitive Processes, Linguistic Factors, and Arithmetic Word Problem Success: a Review of Behavioral Studies. Educ Psychol Rev 35, 105 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09821-6
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09821-6