Skip to main content

Relation Between the Essential Components of Reading and Reading Comprehension in Monolingual Spanish-Speaking Children: a Meta-analysis

Abstract

This meta-analysis aims to quantitatively synthesize the relation between the essential components of reading and reading comprehension in children whose first language is Spanish and who are learning to read in Spanish in a monolingual setting. Searches were conducted in WOS, Scopus, and ERIC from 2000 to 2021. We used a random effects model and Fisher’s z as an index of effect size. We found 33 studies involving 146 effect sizes between the essential components of reading and reading comprehension. The essential components included phonological awareness, morphological awareness, alphabetic principle, fluency, vocabulary, and oral comprehension. Results of the meta-analysis revealed that (1) most studies have focused on understanding the relation between phonological awareness or alphabetic principle and reading comprehension, (2) the largest effect sizes were between phonological awareness and reading comprehension, and between fluency and reading comprehension, and (3) there is a large heterogeneity across studies which is explained, in part, by factors such as age, country where the study was conducted, and the reading comprehension tests used. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alliende, F., Condemarín, M., & Milicic, N. (2007). Prueba de comprensión lectora de complejidad lingüística progresiva (CLP) formas paralelas. Universidad Católica de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. L., Basaraba, D., & Polanco, P. (2016). Connecting the present to the past: Furthering the research on bilingualism and bilingual education. Review of Research in Education Centennial, 40(1), 821–883. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16660691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. L., Biancarosa, G., Park, B. J. S., Bousselot, T., Smith, J., Baker, S. K., Kame’enui, E. J., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2015). Validity of CBM measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension on high-stakes reading assessments in grades 7 and 8. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(1), 57–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9505-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. L., Cummings, K., & Smolkowski, K. (2022a). Diagnostic accuracy of Spanish and English screeners with Spanish and English criterion measures for bilingual students in grades 1 and 2. Journal of School Psychology, 92, 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. L., Park, Y., & Andress, T. T. (2022b). Longitudinal predictors of bilingual language proficiency, decoding, and oral reading fluency on reading comprehension in Spanish and in English. School Psychology Review, 1-14.https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.2021447

  • Baker, D. L., Park, Y., & Baker, S. K. (2012). The reading performance of English learners in grades 1 to 3: The role of initial status and growth on reading fluency in Spanish and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 251–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9261-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. L., Stoolmiller, M., Good, R. H., & Baker, S. K. (2011). Effects of reading comprehension on passage fluency in Spanish and English for second-grade English language learners. School Psychology Review, 40(3), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. L., García, I., Monzalve, M., Crespo, P., & Gutiérrez-Ortega, M. (2021). El desarrollo lector de niños hispanohablantes monolingües: una síntesis sistemática. [The reading development of Spanish monolingual children: a systematic review]. American Education Research Association 106 Annual Conference.

  • Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlitz. (2022, March). The most spoken languages in the world. https://www.berlitz.com/blog/most-spoken-languages-world. Accessed 7/11/2022

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • *Calet, N., Gutiérrez-Palma, N., & Defior, S. (2015). A cross-sectional study of fluency and reading comprehension in Spanish primary school children. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Calet, N., Flores, M., Jiménez-Fernández, G., & Defior, S. (2016). Habilidades fonológicas suprasegmentales y desarrollo lector en niños de educación primaria. Anales de Psicología, 32(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.216221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Calet, N., López-Reyes, R., & Jiménez-Fernández, G. (2020). Do reading comprehension assessment tests result in the same reading profile? A study of Spanish primary school children. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mikulajová, M., Defior, S., Seidlová-Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2019). A cross-linguistic, longitudinal study of the foundations of decoding and reading comprehension ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(5), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1580284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citoler, S. D., Fonseca, L. E., Gottheil, B., & Rosa, P. U. L. G. (2006). LEE. Test de lectura y escritura en español. Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Clinton, A., Christo, C., & Shriberg, D. (2013). Learning to read in Spanish: Contributions of phonological awareness, orthographic coding, and rapid naming. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 1, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2013.780195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colautti, S. (2015). La construcción del lector. Educación, Formación e Investigación, 1(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, P. (2014). Modelo de respuesta a la intervención: nivel 2 de prevención de las dificultades de aprendizaje en lectura en la comunidad autónoma de canarias [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidad de la Laguna.

  • Crespo, P., Jiménez, J. E., Rodríguez, C., Baker, D., & Park, Y. (2018). Differences in growth reading patterns for at-risk Spanish-monolingual children as a function of a tier 2 intervention. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21(E4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuetos, F. (2010). Psicología de la lectura. Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2007). Prolec-r. Evaluación de los procesos lectores–revisado. TEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *D’Alessio, M. J., Jaichenco, V., & Wilson, M. A. (2019). The relationship between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in Spanish-speaking children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(6), 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *De la Calle, A. M., Aguilar, M., & Navarro, J. I. (2016). Desarrollo evolutivo de la conciencia fonológica: ¿cómo se relaciona con la competencia lectora posterior? Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, 6(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.5209/rlog.58553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *De Mier, M. V., Borzone, A. M., & Cupani, M. (2012). La fluidez lectora en los primeros grados: relación entre habilidades de decodificación, características textuales y comprensión. Un estudio piloto con niños hablantes de español. Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, 4(1). https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=439542720003

  • Defior-Citoler, S., Fonseca, L., Gottheil, B., Aldrey, A., Jiménez Fernández, G., Pujals, R., et al. (2006). LEE. Test de lectura y escritura en español. Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, M., Juni, P., Bartlett, C., Holenstein, F., & Sterne, J. (2003). How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical Study. Health Technology Assessment, 7(1), 1–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Escobar, J. P., & Rosas, R. (2018). Los componentes de la velocidad de denominación y su relación con la comprensión lectora en español. Ocnos Revista de Estudios Sobre Lectura, 17(2), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2018.17.2.1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, V., & Rosas, R. (2019). Diferencias iniciales en el proceso de acceso al lenguaje escrito, según nivel socioeconómico. Perspectiva Educacional, 58(3), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-vol.58-iss.3-art.955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ferroni, M. (2020). Impacto del léxico mental en la comprensión lectora en niños de nivel socioeconómico bajo. Actualidades en Psicología, 34(129), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v34i129.37043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Figueroa-Sepúlveda, S., & Gallego-Ortega, J. L. (2021). Relationship between vocabulary and reading comprehension: A transversal study in primary education. Revista Signos, 54(106), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342021000200354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Fumagalli, J. C., Barreyro, J. P., & Jaichenco, V. I. (2017). Fluidez lectora en niños: cuáles son las habilidades subyacentes. Ocnos. Revista de Estudios Sobre Lectura, 16(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2017.16.1.1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Gómez-Velázquez, F. R., González-Garrido, A. A., Zarabozo, D., & Amano, M. (2010). La velocidad de denominación de letras: El mejor predictor temprano del desarrollo lector en español. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 15(46), 823–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottardo, A., Chen, X., & Ru Yun Huo, M. (2021). Understanding within- and cross-language relations among language, preliteracy skills, and word reading in bilingual learners: Evidence from the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Gutiérrez, N., Jiménez, J. E., De León, S. C., & Seoane, R. C. (2020). Assessing foundational reading skills in kindergarten: A curriculum-based measurement in Spanish. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419893649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2018). Choosing between random effects models in meta-analysis: Units of analysis and the generalizability of obtained results. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(10), e12414. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B., Diamond, L., & Gutlohn, L. (2018). Teaching reading sourcebook (3rd ed.). Consortium on Reading Excellence in Education.

  • Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Infante, M., Coloma, C. J., & Himmel, E. (2012). Comprensión lectora, comprensión oral y decodificación en escolares de 2º y 4º básico de escuelas municipales. Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia), 38(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052012000100009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Jiménez, J. E., & Ortiz, M. R. (2000). Conciencia metalingüística y adquisición lectora en la lengua española. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600005527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Jiménez, J. E., Gove, A., Crouch, L., & Rodríguez, C. (2014). Internal structure and standardized scores of the Spanish adaptation of the EGRA (early grade reading assessment) for early reading assessment. Psicothema, 26(4), 531–537. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kim, Y. S., & Pallante, D. (2012). Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lázaro, M., Ruiz Gallego-Largo, T., Escalonilla, A., & Simón, T. (2021). Relación entre conciencia morfológica y destreza lectora: Un estudio con niños hispanohablantes. Revista Signos, 54(105), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342021000100032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lopez-Escribano, C. (2007). Evaluation of the double-deficit hypothesis subtype classification of readers in Spanish. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(4), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400040301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *López-Escribano, C. (2012). Reading acquisition in monolingual Spanish-speaking first grade children. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioral Science, 2(3), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjesbs/2012/1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *López-Escribano, C., & Katzir, T. (2008). Are phonological processes separate from the processes underlying naming speed in a shallow orthography? Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 16, 641–666. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v6i16.1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *López-Escribano, C., De Juan, M. R. E., Gómez-Veiga, I., & García-Madruga, J. A. (2013). A predictive study of reading comprehension in third-grade Spanish students. Psicothema, 25(2), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *López-Escribano, C., Ivanova, A., & Shtereva, K. (2018). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and vocabulary are significant predictors of reading in consistent orthographies: A comparison of reading acquisition procedures in bulgarian and Spanish. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 16(44), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v16i44.1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matute, E., Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., & Ostrosky, F. (2007). Evaluación neuropsicológica infantil ENI. Manual Moderno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. (2022). Alumnado extranjero por titularidad/financiación, comunidad autónoma/provincia y área geográfica de nacionalidad. Estadística de las enseñanzas no universitarias.

  • MINEDUC. (2018). Estadísticas de la educación 2018. Ministerio de Educación de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F., Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., Mather, N., & Ardoino, G. (2009). Batería III Woodcock-Muñoz. Ciencias Psicológicas, 3(2), 245–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: report of the national early literacy panel. National Institute for Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: reports of the subgroups. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, P., Lee, K., Luo, J., Li, S., Joshi, R. M., & Tao, S. (2021). Simple view of reading in chinese: A one-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Review of Educational Research, 1, 3–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320964198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Pérez-Pereira, M., Martínez-López, Z., & Maneiro, L. (2020). Longitudinal relationships between reading abilities, phonological awareness, language abilities and executive functions: Comparison of low risk preterm and full-term children. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown & P. Haggort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Puyuelo, M., Renom, J., Solanas, A. & Wiig, E. H. (2007). Evaluación del lenguaje. BLOC-screening R (BLOC-SR) [Language assessment BLOC-SR]. Masson.

  • Riffo, B., Véliz, M., Castro, G., Reyes, F., Figueroa, B., Salazar, O., & Herrera, M. O. (2011). LECTUM. Prueba de comprensión lectora. CONICYT.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Riffo, B., Caro, N., & Sáez, K. (2018). Conciencia lingüística, lectura en voz alta y comprensión lectora. RLA. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 56(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832018000200175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripoll-Salceda, J. C., Aguado-Alonso, G., & Castilla-Earls, A. P. (2014). The simple view of reading in elementary school: A systematic review. Revista de Logoterapia, Foniatría y Audiología, 34(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2013.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripoll-Salceda, J. C., Tapia Montesinos, M., & Aguado-Alonso, G. (2020). Reading rate in Spanish-speaking students: A meta-analysis. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 25(2), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2020.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rodríguez-Ortiz, I. R., Moreno-Pérez, F. J., Simpson, I. C., Valdés-Coronel, M., & Saldaña, D. (2021). The influence of syntactic knowledge on reading comprehension varies as a function of oral vocabulary in Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Research in Reading, 44, 695–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rodriguez-Vega, Y., Rodríguez Torres, A. M., & Rivas Campos, M. D. C. (2017). Metamorphological skills and their incidence on reading comprehension. Signos, 50(95). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342017000300453

  • *Rosselli, M., Matute, E., & Ardila, A. (2006). Predictores neuropsicológicos de la lectura en español. Revista de Neurología, 42(4), 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RTI International. (2009). The early grade reading assessment: applications and interventions to improve basic literacy. Research Triangle Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Meca, J. (2010). Cómo realizar una revisión sistemática y un meta-análisis. Aula Abierta, 38(2), 53–64. http://hdl.handle.net/11162/5126

  • Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., Collaboration with COST Action A8 Network. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in european orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis (pp. 99–110). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • *Simpson, I. C., Moreno-Pérez, F. J., De los Reyes Rodríguez-Ortiz, I., Valdés-Coronel, M., & Saldaña, D. (2020). The Effects of morphological and syntactic knowledge on reading comprehension in Spanish speaking children. Reading and Writing, 33(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09964-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individualdifferences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.21.4.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toro, J., & Cervera, M. (1980). Test de análisis de la lectoescritura. Aprendizaje Visor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W. & Hoover, W. (2019). The cognitive foundations of learning to read: A framework for preventing and remediating reading difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2019.1614081

  • U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (2002). No child left behind: A desktop reference. United States Department of Education.

  • *Vargas, I. M., Cueva Ibarguen, F. E., Rivera-Samudio, J., & Lévano-Francia, L. (2020). Phonological awareness and reading comprehension of second grade students in regular basic education. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 12(1), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.9756/INT-JECSE/V12|1.201021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Vergara, D., Strasser, K., & del Río, M. F. (2016). Más que palabras por minuto: las otras habilidades que afectan la comprensión en 1º básico. Calidad en la Educación, 44, 46–67. https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n44.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vissani, L.E., Scherman, P., & Fantini, N.D. (2017). Emilia Ferreiro y Ana Teberosky. Los sistemas de escritura en el desarrollo del niño. IX Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

  • Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Zevallos-Polo, D., Arcos Araujo, N., & Ripoll Salceda, J. (2017). La concepción simple de la lectura en alumnos de 4º de primaria de una escuela fiscal de Quito. Alteridad, 12(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v12n1.2017.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mónica Gutiérrez-Ortega.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 4

Table 4 Characteristics of Reading Comprehension Measures Identified in the Studies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baker, D.L., Alberto, P.C., Macaya, M.M. et al. Relation Between the Essential Components of Reading and Reading Comprehension in Monolingual Spanish-Speaking Children: a Meta-analysis. Educ Psychol Rev 34, 2661–2696 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09694-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09694-1

Keywords

  • Comprehension
  • Meta-analysis
  • Phonological awareness
  • Alphabetic principle
  • Vocabulary
  • Fluency
  • Spanish