Skip to main content
Log in

Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to examine the effects that audiobook listening and print reading have on comprehension performance and the role that learner characteristics, text features, and contextual factors play in reported outcomes. The review, which included 32 documents, covered elementary, secondary, and college students who processed narrative and expository texts aurally via audiobooks and visually on paper or screen. Analysis showed that the majority of studies were conducted in classrooms where audiobooks were co-presented with printed texts. It was also shown that audiobooks by themselves tended to facilitate comprehension better than print when students were younger (g = .28 to g = .58). For identified populations, such as struggling readers and EFLs, the co-presentation of audiobooks with print proved better for comprehension than print alone (g = .32 to g = 1.67). There was a paucity of studies that directly compared audiobook listening to print reading; targeted older students with no identified learning needs; or focused on exposition. Implications for instructional practice and future research are forwarded, based on the patterns that emerged from this review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

*Indicates studies included in the systematic review

  • Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcantud Díaz, M., & Gregori-Signes, C. (2014). Audiobooks: Improving fluency and instilling literary skills and education for development. Tejuelo, 20, 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285–310). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Alexander, P. A., & Knight, S. L. (1993). Dimensions of the interplay between learning and teaching. The Educational Forum, 57(3), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131729309335422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903029006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., & the Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722511

  • *Alsamadani, H. A. (2017). The effect of talking story books on Saudi young EFL learners' reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n5p204

  • Alter, A. (2018, June 2). Want to read Michael Lewis’s next work? you’ll be able to listen to it first. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/02/books/audible-michael-lewis-audiobooks.html

  • Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312014004367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, T. K. F., Chan, W. W., Cheng, L., Siegel, L. S., & Tso, R. V. Y. (2015). Can non–interactive language input benefit young second–language learners? Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000913000627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audio Publishers Association. (2018, June 12). Another banner year of robust growth for the audiobook industry [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.audiopub.org/uploads/pdf/2018–Consumer–Sales–Survey–Final–PR.pdf

  • Audio Publishers Association. (2019, July 17). U.S. publishers report nearly $1 billion in sales as strong industry growth continues [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.audiopub.org/uploads/pdf/APA–Sales–Survey–Press–Release–July–2019–with–2018–Data.pdf

  • Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20(4), R136–R140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Berger, N. S., & Perfetti, C. A. (1977). Reading skill and memory for spoken and written discourse. Journal of Reading Behavior 9(1):7-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862967709547200

  • *Boeglin–Quintana, B., & Donovan, L. (2013). Storytime using iPods: Using technology to reach all learners. TechTrends, 57(6), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0701x

  • Boyle, E. A., Rosenberg, M. S., Connelly, V. J., Washburn, S. G., Brinckerhoff, L. C., & Banerjee, M. (2003). Effects of audio texts on the acquisition of secondary–level content by students with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(3), 203–214 . https://doi.org/10.2307/1593652

  • Bramlett, R., Cates, G. L., Savina, E., & Lauinger, B. (2010). Assessing effectiveness and efficiency of academic interventions in school psychology journals: 1995–2005. Psychology in the Schools, 47(2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading–while–listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 136–163.

  • Byrom, G. (1998). If you can’t read it then audio read it. Reading, 32(2), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.00081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., Waters, G., Bertram, J., Ostrowski, A., & Michaud, J. (2016). Effects of written and auditory language-processing skills on written passage comprehension in middle and high school students. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(1), 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbo, M. (1978). Teaching reading with talking books. The Reading Teacher, 32(3), 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casbergue, R. M., & Harris, K. (1996). Listening and literacy: Audiobooks in the reading program. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 37(1), 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., Baldwin, L. E., & Chall, J. S. (2009). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Harvard University Press.

  • Chafe, W., & Danielewitz, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 83–113). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chang, A. C., & Millett, S. (2014). The effect of extensive listening on developing L2 listening fluency: Some hard evidence. ELT Journal, 68(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct052

  • *Chang, A. C. S., & Millett, S. (2015). Improving reading rates and comprehension through audio–assisted extensive reading for beginner learners. System, 52, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.05.003

  • Cheetham, D. (2019). Multi–modal language input: A learned superadditive effect. Applied Linguistics Review, 10(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, C. (1976). After decoding: What? Language Arts, 53(3), 288–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Conte, R., & Humphreys, R. (1989). Repeated readings using audiotaped material enhances oral reading in children with reading difficulties. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(89)90007-5

  • Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2010). They hear, but do not listen: Retention for podcasted material in a classroom context. Teaching of Psychology, 37(3), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.488542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta–analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deniz, F., Nunez-Elizalde, A. O., Huth, A. G., & Gallant, J. L. (2019). The representation of semantic information across human cerebral cortex during listening versus reading is invariant to stimulus modality. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(39), 7722–7736. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWeaver, M. J. (1979). Listening comprehension by nonblind handicapped students at three rates of speed. Exceptional Children, 46(3), 202–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Diakidoy, I. A. N., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C., & Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology, 26(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710590910584

  • Diergarten, A. K., & Nieding, G. (2015). Children’s and adults’ ability to build online emotional inferences during comprehension of audiovisual and auditory texts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16(2), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2013.848871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore, D. L., Loughlin, S. M., Parkinson, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2015). The effects of persuasive and expository text on metacognitive monitoring and control. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). PPVT-4: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Pearson Assessments.

  • Dunkel, P. (1991). Listening in the native and second/foreign language: Toward an integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 431–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Dyni, L. M. (2007). Promoting vocabulary acquisition among grade one and two ESL students with word explanation and repeated reading using audiotaped books (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

  • Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader–text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteves, K. J., & Whitten, E. (2011). Assisted reading with digital audiobooks for students with reading disabilities. Reading Horizons, 51(1), 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenesi, B., Sana, F., Kim, J. A., & Shore, D. I. (2015). Reconceptualizing working memory in educational research. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9286-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., & Alexander, P. A. (2009). Text comprehension: A retrospective, perspective, and prospective. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 227–239). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, A., Gilman, M., Johnson, M., & Demeke, A. (2017). Does reading-while-listening enhance students’ reading fluency? preliminary results from school experiments in rural Uganda. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(7), 82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Benson, I., & Gunter, B. (1987). Memory for television commercials as a function of the channel of communication. Social Behaviour, 2(2), 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Furnham, A., Gunter, B., & Green, A. (1990). Remembering science: The recall of factual information as a function of the presentation mode. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350040305

  • Garner, R. (1987). Strategies for reading and studying expository text. Educational Psychologist, 22(3–4), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1987.9653054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R., Hare, V. C., Alexander, P., Haynes, J., & Winograd, P. (1984). Inducing use of a text lookback strategy among unsuccessful readers. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021004789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies. The Falmer Press.

  • Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Gose, M. D. (1987). Research on the read–a–long format. Teacher Education Quarterly, 14(1) 98–101. 

  • Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Have, I., & Stougaard Pedersen, B. (2016). Digital audiobooks: New media, users, and experiences. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Have, I., & Stougaard Pedersen, B. (2020). Reading audiobooks. In L. Elleström (Ed.), Beyond media borders, Volume 1: Intermedial relations among multimodal media (pp. 197–216). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49679-1_6

  • Hildyard, A., & Olson, D. R. (1978). Memory and inference in the comprehension of oral and written discourse. Discourse Processes, 1(2), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638537809544431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hawkins, R. O., Marsicano, R., Schmitt, A. J., McCallum, E., & Musti–Rao, S. (2015). Comparing the efficiency of repeated reading and listening–while–reading to improve fluency and comprehension. Education & Treatment of Children, 38(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2015.0005

  • Haymore, S. (2017, December 2). Making audiobooks more personable: A UI/UX case study. Medium. https://medium.com/@sarahanne.haymore/case-study-myshelf-native-ios-app-409ce3903329

  • *Hickey, T. (1991). Leisure reading in a second language: An experiment with audio‐tapes in Irish. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 4(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908319109525098

  • *Jablonski, D. (2019). Repeated listening as a method to improve reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 20(2), 2–24 .

  • Jenkins, J. J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak & F. L. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 429–446). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. J. (1986). A functional approach to studies of comprehension. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 167–188). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60137-0

  • Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kartal, G., & Simsek, H. (2017). The effects of audiobooks on EFL students’ listening comprehension. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 17(1), 112–123.

  • Kendeou, P., Lynch, J. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., & Kremer, K. E. (2005). Developing successful readers: Building early comprehension skills through television viewing and listening. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-005-0030-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M. A., & Symons, S. E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text: Effects on children’s reading of informational material. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-003-8128-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kintsch, W., & Kozminsky, E. (1977). Summarizing stories after reading and listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(5), 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.69.5.491

  • Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta–analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Le Fevre, D. M., Moore, D. W., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2003). Tape‐assisted reciprocal teaching: Cognitive bootstrapping for poor decoders. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709903762869905

  • Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 111–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90006-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • *McGill, A. H. (2016). Audio books with struggling readers at the elementary school level (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw–Hill College.

  • *Milliner, B. (2019). Comparing extensive reading to extensive reading–while–listening on smartphones: Impacts on listening and reading performance for beginning students. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 19(1), 1–19.

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G., & The Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

  • Montali, J., & Lewandowski, L. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949602900305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J., & Cahill, M. (2016). Audiobooks: Legitimate “reading” material for adolescents? School Library Research, 19, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Moyer, J. E. (2011). What does it really mean to" read" a text?. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(3), 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.00031

  • Murphy, P. K., Knight, S. L., & Dowd, A. C. (2017). Familiar paths and new directions: Inaugural call for manuscripts. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317691764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Nakashima, K., Stephens, M., & Kamata, S. (2018). The interplay of silent reading, reading–while–listening and listening–only. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 18(1), 104–123.

  • Noland, T. (2020, October 26). Helping students with dyslexia experience learning success. Learning Ally. https://learningally.org/Solutions-for-School/Educator-Blog/helping-students-with-dyslexia-experience-learning-success

  • Noyes, J. M., & Garland, K. J. (2008). Computer–vs. paper–based tasks: Are they equivalent?. Ergonomics, 51(9), 1352–1375.

  • Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four–year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy. Methuen Publishing.

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & Hamilton, E. E. (2009). The development of children’s reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 32–53). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicer-Sánchez, A., Tragant, E., Conklin, K., Rodgers, M., Serrano, R., & Llanes, A. (2020). Young learners’ processing of multimodal input and its impact on reading comprehension: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2019, September 25). One–in–five Americans now listen to audiobooks. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org

  • Porion, A., Aparicio, X., Megalakaki, O., Robert, A., & Baccino, T. (2016). The impact of paper based versus computerized presentation on text comprehension and memorization. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND. https://doi.org/10.1222/0833031058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renandya, W. A., & Farrell, T. S. (2011). Teacher, the tape is too fast! Extensive Listening in ELT. ELT Journal, 65(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2015). Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037478

  • *Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2016). Does modality matter? The effects of reading, listening, and dual modality on comprehension. SAGE Open, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016669550

  • Rubery, M. (Ed.). (2011). Audiobooks, literature, and sound studies. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, M. (2016). The untold story of the talking book. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1994). Toward an interactive model of reading. In. R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 864–894). International Reading Association.

  • Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2009). To scroll or not to scroll: Scrolling, working memory capacity, and comprehending complex texts. Human Factors, 51(5), 730–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809352788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G. J., Cho, E., Williams, K. J., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S. R., & Carroll, M. (2016). A century of progress: Reading interventions for students in grades 4–12, 1914–2014. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 756–800. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316652942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • School-to-School International. (2017). Technology-based innovations to improve early grade reading outcomes in developing countries. All Children Reading: A Grand Challenge for Development (ACR GCD). https://allchildrenreading.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Summative-EdTech-for_Literacy-Web-2.pdf

  • Scherer, G.A. (1950). The psychology of teaching reading through listening. German Quarterly, 151–160.

  • Siciliano, P. C., Jenks, M. A., Dana, M. N., & Talbert, B. A. (2011). The impact of audio technology on undergraduate instruction in a study abroad course on English gardens. NACTA Journal, 55(2), 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidi, Y., Ophir, Y., & Ackerman, R. (2016). Generalizing screen inferiority—Does the medium, screen versus paper, affect performance even with brief tasks? Metacognition and Learning, 11(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9150-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017a). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017b). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer Trakhman, L. M., Alexander, P. A., & Silverman, A. B. (2018). Profiling reading in print and digital mediums. Learning and Instruction, 57, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., & Alexander, P.A. (2021). Reading and digital listening habits of college students [Manuscript in preparation]. Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland.

  • Skinner, C. H., Robinson, D. H., Adamson, K. L., Atchison, L. A., & Woodward, J. R. (1998). Effects of different listening–while–reading rates on comprehension in secondary students with reading deficits. Special Services in the Schools, 13(1/2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v13n01_08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Smiley, S. S., Oakley, D. D., Worthen, D., Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1977). Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(4), 381–387.. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.69.4.381

  • Stephens, M. (2011). The primacy of extensive listening. ELT Journal, 65(3), 311–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Stepien–Bernabe, N. N., Lei, D., McKerracher, A., & Orel–Bixler, D. (2019). The impact of presentation mode and technology on reading comprehension among blind and sighted individuals. Optometry and Vision Science, 96(5), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001373

  • Stevens, E. A., Walker, M. A., & Vaughn, S. (2017). The effects of reading fluency interventions on the reading fluency and reading comprehension performance of elementary students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research from 2001 to 2014. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(5), 576–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416638028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Støle, H., Mangen, A., & Schwippert, K. (2020). Assessing children’s reading comprehension on paper and screen: A mode–effect study. Computers & Education, 151, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Stone–Harris, S. (2008). The benefit of utilizing audiobooks with students who are struggling readers (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

  • Sticht, T. G. (1974). Auding and Reading: A Developmental Model. https://doi.org/10.1037/e457482004-001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surber, J. R., & Schroeder, M. (2007). Effect of prior domain knowledge and headings on processing of informative text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press.

  • Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90005-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tragant Mestres, E., & Vallbona, A. (2018). Reading while listening to learn: Young EFL learners’ perceptions. ELT Journal, 72(4), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Tragant Mestres, E., Llanes Baró, À., & Pinyana Garriga, À. (2019). Linguistic and non–linguistic outcomes of a reading–while–listening program for young learners of English. Reading and Writing, 32(3), 819–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9886-x

  • Tuttle, D. W. (1972). A comparison of three reading media for the blind: Braille, normal recording, and compressed speech. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 4(2), 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Atteveldt, N., Roebroeck, A., & Goebel, R. (2009). Interaction of speech and script in human auditory cortex: Insights from neuro–imaging and effective connectivity. Hearing Research, 258(1–2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2009.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Varao Sousa, T. L., Carriere, J. S., & Smilek, D. (2013). The way we encounter reading material influences how frequently we mind wander. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 892. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00892

  • Verlaan, W., Pearce, D. L., & Zeng, G. (2017). Revisiting Sticht: The changing nature of the relationship between listening comprehension and reading comprehension among upper elementary and middle school students over the last 50 years. Literacy Research and Instruction, 56(2), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2016.1275070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. A., & Kintsch, W. (1991). Expository text. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 230–245). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • *Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. (2015). Second language vocabulary learning through extensive reading with audio support: How do frequency and distribution of occurrence affect learning?. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814559800

  • *Wheeler, K. (2014). Comprehension and motivation levels in conjunction with the use of ebooks with audio: A quasi–experimental study of post–secondary remedial reading students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

  • Winn, B. D., Skinner, C. H., Oliver, R., Hale, A. D., & Ziegler, M. (2006). The effects of listening while reading and repeated reading on the reading fluency of adult learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(3), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.3.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittkower, D.E. (2011). A provisional phenomenology of the audiobook. In M. Rubery (Ed.), Audiobooks, literature, and sound studies (Vol. 12, pp. 216–231).Routledge.

  • Wise, J. C., Sevcik, R. A., Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M., Kuhn, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. (2010). The relationship between different measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension in second-grade students who evidence different oral reading fluency difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(3), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0093)

  • Wolfe, M. B. W. (2005). Memory for narrative and expository text: Independent influences of semantic associations and text organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, G. (2008). Using audiobooks to meet the needs of adolescent readers. American Secondary Education 36(2), 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham, J., Huffman, S., Christensen, R., & McAllister, T. (2013). Use of audiobooks in a school library and positive effects of struggling readers’ participation in a library-sponsored audiobook club. School Library Research, 16, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Woodall, B. (2010). Simultaneous listening and reading in ESL: Helping second language learners read (and enjoy reading) more efficiently. TESOL Journal, 1(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.5054/tj.2010.220151

  • Yeung, K. L., Carpenter, S. K., & Corral, D. (2021). A comprehensive review of educational technology on objective learning outcomes in academic contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 1–48,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09592-4

  • Zhang, X. (2013). Foreign language listening anxiety and listening performance: Conceptualizations and causal relationships. System, 41(1), 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anisha Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, A., Alexander, P.A. Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Educ Psychol Rev 34, 677–715 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09653-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09653-2

Keywords

Navigation