Correction to: Educational Psychology Review
The originally published version of this article contained mistakes and the author would like to correct them.
In the right panel of Fig. 1, the gray circles representing source credibility of the example sources were mislabeled as “high” credibility. The correct labels should indicate “low” credibility because those sources (Fox News, Buzzfeed, and Huffington Post) are relatively low credibility compared to the sources included in the left panel. The corrected image appears as follows:
KReC-MD Documents model in scenario 1: high-credibility sources (left) and scenario 2: low-credibility sources (right). Black circles represent concepts in the situations model. The large dotted circle represents the intertext model, and smaller white circles represent the documents. Gray circles represent source credibility tags. Double-headed arrows represent source-source links. Single-headed arrows represent intertext links
The original article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09603-y.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butterfuss, R., Kendeou, P. Correction to: KReC-MD: Knowledge Revision with Multiple Documents. Educ Psychol Rev 34, 475–476 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09634-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09634-5