We present the results of a meta-analytic synthesis of the literature on the association between the use of frequent low-stakes quizzes in real classes and students’ academic performance in those classes. Data from 52 independent samples from real classes (N = 7864) suggests a moderate association of d = .42 between the use of quizzes and academic performance. Effects are even stronger in psychology classes (d = .47) and when quiz performance contributed to class grades (d = .51). We also find that performance on quizzes is strongly correlated with academic performance (k = 19, N = 3814, r = .57) such that quiz performance is relatively strongly predictive of later exam performance. We also found that the use of quizzes is associated with a large increase in the odds of passing a class (k = 5, N = 1004, odds ratio = 2.566).
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
References with an asterisk next to them are studies included in the meta-analysis.
*Achord, R. L. K. (2015). The effect of frequent quizzing on student populations with differing preparation and motivation in the high school biology classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA.
Adesope, O., Trevisan, D., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests: a meta-analysis of practice testing. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659–701.
Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. L., & Bushman, B. J. (1999). Research in the laboratory: truth or triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 3–9.
Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2013). Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 39(3), 940–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029199.
*Azzi, A. J., Ramnanan, C. J., Smith, J., Dionne, E., & Jalali, A. (2015). To quiz or not to quiz: formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8(5), 413–420.
*Bachman, L., & Bachman, C. (2011). A study of classroom response system clickers: increasing student engagement and performance in a large undergraduate lecture class on architectural research. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 22.
Basol, G., & Johanson, G. (2009). Effectiveness of frequent testing over achievement: a meta analysis study. International Journal of Human Sciences, 6(2), 99–121.
*Batsell, Jr., W. R., Perry, J. L., Hanley, E., & Hostetter, A. B. (2017). Ecological validity of the testing effect: the use of daily quizzes in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 18–23.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(2), 89–99.
*Beaulieu, R. P., & Utecht, K. M. (1990). Weekly administered formative tests of a modified format and student performance. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 17(2), 55–58.
*Beaulieu, R. P., & Utecht, K. M. (1987). Frequently administered formative tests and student achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 14, 195–200.
Bell, M. C., Simone, P. M., & Whitfield, L. C. (2015). Failure of online quizzing to improve performance in introductory psychology courses. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(2), 163–171.
*Bjork, E. L., Little, J. L., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Multiple-choice testing as a desirable difficulty in the classroom. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 165-170. http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.002.
Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(4), 657–668.
*Bojnova, E. D., & Oigara, J. N. (2011). Teaching and learning with clickers: are clickers good for students. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7, 169–184.
Boot, W. R., Simons, D. J., Stothart, C., & Stutts, C. (2013). The pervasive problem with placebos in psychology: why active control groups are not sufficient to rule out placebo effects. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(4), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613491271.
*Brothen, T., & Wambach, C. (2001). Effective student use of computerized quizzes. Teaching of Psychology, 28(4), 292–294.
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273.
Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017021.
Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1547–1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024140.
Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 268–276.
Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202713.
Chan, J. C. K., Manley, K. D., Davis, S. D., & Spunzar, K. K. (2018a). Testing potentiates new learning across a retention interval and a lag: a strategy change perspective. Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 83–96.
Chan, J. C. K., Meissner, C. A., & Davis, S. D. (2018b). Retrieval potentiates new learning: a theoretical and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(11), 1111–1146. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000166.
Credé, M., Roch, S., & Kieszczynska, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: a meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 272–295.
*Czekanski, A. J., & Roux, D. M. P., (2009). The use of clicker technology to evaluate short and long-term concept retention (unpublished thesis). United States Military Academy, West Point, NY.
Dahlke, J. A., & Wiernik, B. M. (2019). psychmeta: an R package for psychometric meta-analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43(5), 515–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621618795933.
*Daniel, D., & Broida, J. (2004). Using web-based quizzing to improve exam performance: lessons learned. Teaching of Psychology, 31(3), 207–208.
*Deeter, C. L. (2008). The effect of online quizzes on student achievement in high school chemistry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.
*Dobson, J. L. (2008). The use of formative online quizzes to enhance class preparation and scores on summative exams. Advances in Physiology Education, 32(4), 297–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.90162.2008.
*Downs, S. D. (2015). Testing in the college classroom: do testing and feedback influence grades throughout an entire semester? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(2), 172–181.
Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., Lynam, D. R., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2011). Role of test motivation in intelligence testing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(19), 7716–7720. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018601108.
*Fenderson, B. A., Fishback, J., & Damjanov, I. (1996). Weekly mini-examinations (quizzes) based on extended-matching questions as a means for monitoring medical student performance. Croatian Medical Journal, 37(4).
*Fitzpatrick, K., Finn, K., & Campisi, J. (2011). Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(3), 280–289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00036.2011.
Godden, D., & Baddeley, A. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 325–331.
*Geiger, O. G., & Bostow, D. E. (1976). Contingency-managed college instruction: effects of weekly quizzes on performance on examination. Psychological Reports, 39, 707–710, 3.
*Gholami, V., & Moghaddam, M. (2013). The effect of weekly quizzes on students’ final achievement score. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(1), 36–41.
*Graham, R. B. (1999). Unannounced quizzes raise test scores selectively for mid-range students. Teaching of Psychology, 26(4), 271–273.
*Haberyan, K. (2003). Do weekly quizzes improve student performance on general biology exams? The American Biology Teacher, 65(2), 110–114.
*Haigh, M. (2007). Sustaining learning through assessment: an evaluation of the value of a weekly class quiz. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(4), 457–474.
*Hattikudur, S., Postle, B. R. (2011). Effects of test-enhanced learning in a cognitive psychology course. Journal of Behavior and Neuroscience Research, 9(2), 151–157.
*Hertzberg, O. E., Heilman, J. D., & Leuenberger, H. W. (1932). The value of objective tests as teaching devices in educational psychology classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 23(5), 371-380. http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1037/h0072896.
*Hirschman, B. (2017). The effects of daily quizzes on student achievement in a chemistry class (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Montana State University, Bozeman, MN.
*Iwamoto, D. H., Hargis, J., Taitano, E. J., & Vuong, K. (2017). Analyzing the efficacy of the testing effect using kahoot™ on student performance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 80–93. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/docview/1941340750?accountid=10906
Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Daniels, K. A., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: depth of retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 852–857.
Jang, Y., & Huber, D. E. (2008). Context retrieval and context change in free recall: recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-73184.108.40.206.
*Johnson, B. C., & Kiviniemi, M. T. (2009). The effect of online chapter quizzes on exam performance in an undergraduate social psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 33–37, 1.
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 151–162 http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004.
*Klass, G., & Crothers, L. (2000). An experimental evaluation of web-based tutorial quizzes. Social Science Computer Review, 18(4), 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930001800413.
*Krasne, S., Wimmers, P. F., Relan, A., & Drake, T. A. (2006). Differential effects of two types of formative assessment in predicting performance of first-year medical students. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-5290-9.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79–97.
*Kulesza, A. E., Clawson, M. E., & Ridgway, J. S. (2014). Student success indicators associated with clicker-administered quizzes in an honors introductory biology course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(4), 73–79.
*Landrum, R. E. (2007). Introductory psychology student performance: weekly quizzes followed by a cumulative final exam. Teaching of Psychology, 34(3), 177–180.
Little, J. L., Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A., & Angello, G. (2012). Multiple choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1337–1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443370.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.
*Lyle, K. B., & Crawford, N. A. (2011). Retrieving essential material at the end of lectures improves performance on statistics exams. Teaching of Psychology, 38(2), 94–97.
*Mach, G. R. (1963). A comparative study of student performance in an intermediate calculus class as a result of different evaluation programs (Unpublished dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
*Marshall, L. L., & Varnon, A. W. (2012). An empirical investigation of clicker technology in financial accounting principles. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 7–17.
Martinez, M. E. (1999). Cognition and the question of test item format. Educational Psychologist, 34(4), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3404_2.
*Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., . . . Zhang, H. (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 51-57. http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002.
*McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, Henry L. I, II (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: the effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 399–414. http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1037/a0021782
*McDaniel, M. A., Wildman, K. M., & Anderson, J. L. (2012). Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: an experimental study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(1), 18–26 http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.10.001.
*Michaels, J. L. (2017). Quizzes benefit freshman and sophomore students more than junior and senior students in introductory psychology classes with noncumulative exams. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(4), 272-283. http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1037/stl0000098.
*Morling, B., McAuliffe, M., Cohen, L., & DiLorenzo, T. M. (2008). Efficacy of personal response systems (“clickers”) in large, introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 45–50, 1.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(5), 519–533.
*Narloch, R., Garbin, C. P., & Turnage, K. D. (2006). Benefits of prelecture quizzes. Teaching of Psychology, 33(2), 109-112. http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1207/s15328023top3302_6.
*Nevid, J. S., & Mahon, K. (2009). Mastery quizzing as a signaling device to cue attention to lecture material. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 29–32, 1.
*Nystrom, N. K. (1969). An experimental study to compare the relative effects of two methods of instruction on learning of intermediate algebra (Unpublished dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Pashler, H., Rohrer, D., Cepeda, N. J., & Carpenter, S. K. (2007). Enhanced learning and retarded forgetting: choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(2), 187–193.
Pastötter, B., Schicker, S., Niedernhuber, J., & Bäuml, K. T. (2011). Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021801.
Pustejovsky, J. E., & Rodgers, M. A. (2019). Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1332
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2010). Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330(6002), 335.
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Why is test–restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026166.
Redick, T. (2019). The hype cycle of working memory training. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419848668.
Rickard, T. C., & Pan, S. C. (2018). A dual memory theory of the testing effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 847–859. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1298-4.
Roediger, H. L., Agarwal, P. K., McDaniel, M. A., & McDermott, K. B. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: long-term improvements from quizzing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 382–395.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.
*Ross, C. C., & Henry, L. K. (1939). The relation between frequency of testing and progress in learning psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(8), 604-611. http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1037/h0055717.
Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463.
*Ruscio, J. (2001). Administering quizzes at random to increase students' reading. Teaching of Psychology, 28(3), 204-206. http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1207/S15328023TOP2803_08.
Schwieren, J., Barenberg, J., & Dutke, S. (2017). The testing effect in the psychology classroom: a meta-analytic perspective. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 179–196 http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.iastate.edu/10.1177/1475725717695149.
*Selakovich, D. (1962). An experiment attempting to determine the effectiveness of frequent testing as an aid to learning in beginning college courses in American government. The Journal of Educational Research, 55(4), 178–180.
Sisk, V. E., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & MacNamara, B. N. (2017). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704.
Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests. Memory, 22(7), 784–802.
Thijssen, D. H. J., Hopman, M. T. E., van Wijngaarden, M. T., Hoenderop, J. G. J., Bindels, R. J. M., & Eijsvogel, T. M. J. (2019). The impact of feedback during formative testing on study behaviour and performance of (bio) medical students: a randomised controlled study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 97 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1534-x.
*Trumbo, M. C., Leiting, K. A., McDaniel, M. A., & Hodge, G. K. (2016). Effects of reinforcement on test-enhanced learning in a large, diverse introductory college psychology course. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(2), 148–160.
*Tuckman, B. W. (1996). The relative effectiveness of incentive motivation and prescribed learning strategy in improving college students’ course performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64(3), 197–210.
Vanhove, A. J., & Harms, P. D. (2015). Reconciling the two disciplines of organisational science: a comparison of findings from lab and field research. Applied Psychology, 64(4), 637–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12046.
*Wellington, W., Hutchinson, D., & Faria, A. J. (2015). The effectiveness of online quizzing as a repetitive learning tool in a marketing class: a field study of the testing effect. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 42, 42–49.
Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2011). The interim test effect: testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(6), 1140–1147. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0140-7.
*Zarei, A. A. (2008). The effect of quiz frequency on course performance and its relationship with class attendance. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 162–180.
Zaromb, F. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2010). The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes. Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 995–1008. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.995.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Sotola, L.K., Crede, M. Regarding Class Quizzes: a Meta-analytic Synthesis of Studies on the Relationship Between Frequent Low-Stakes Testing and Class Performance. Educ Psychol Rev 33, 407–426 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09563-9
- Testing effect
- Test-potentiated new learning
- Class quizzes