Previous studies have investigated the characteristics, influencing factors, and working strategies of highly successful educational psychologists. These studies, however, have focused mainly on male scholars. Consequently, little is known about how successful female educational psychologists go about their work and are so productive. In the present study, we addressed this gap by interviewing five leading female educational psychologists (Patricia Alexander, Carol Dweck, Jacquelynne Eccles, Mareike Kunter, and Tamara van Gog) about factors that have aided their success and about their gender-related experiences. The five female scholars revealed their trademark characteristics, the important people and places that influenced their careers, and their time- and research-management strategies. They also provided unique insights about their experiences and perspectives as women in the field of educational psychology. Findings offer guidance for budding scholars, particularly women.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Max Planck Institutes are independent research institutions in Germany and abroad that are operated by the Max Planck Society.
We counted the presenting authors and discussants at the EARLI 2019 conference. There were 1266 women, 651 men, and 23 names not clearly classified as male or female.
Habilitation is a postdoctoral qualification that used to be a prerequisite for a professorship in many European countries.
Adler, M., & Lenz, K. (2016). Father involvement in the early years: An International comparison of policy and practice. Policy Press.
Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680574.
Alexander, P. A. (2018). Information management versus knowledge building: Implications for learning and assessment in higher education. In O. Zlatkin- Troitschanskaia & H. A. Pant (Eds.), Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education: Cross national comparisons and perspectives (pp. 43–56). New York: Springer.
Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 375–404. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004375.
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1994). The influence of topic knowledge, domain knowledge, and interest on the comprehension of scientific exposition. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(4), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(94)90001-9.
Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903029006.
Alexander, P. A., Winters, F. I., Loughlin, S. M., & Grossnickle, E. M. (2012). Students’ conceptions of knowledge, information, and truth. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.004.
American Educational Research Association. (2019). AERA by the numbers. http://www.aera.net/About-AERA/Who-We-Are/AERA-By-The-Numbers
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x.
Brown, L., & Watson, P. (2010). Understanding the experiences of female doctoral students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(3), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2010.484056.
Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(3), 415–449. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1103.
Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. (2017). Familienreport 2017: Leistungen, Wirkungen, Trends. [Family report 2017: Achievements, effects, trends]. https://www.bmfsfj.de/blob/119524/f51728a14e3c91c3d8ea657bb01bbab0/familienreport-2017-data.pdf.
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006.
Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0091.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). New York: Sage.
Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2012). A critical discussion of deep and surface processing: What it means, how it is measured, the role of context, and model specification. Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 499–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9198-7.
Dong, Y., Johnson, R. A., Yang, Y., & Chawla, N. V. (2015). Collaboration signatures reveal scientific impact. In J. Pei, F. Silvestri, & J. Tang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (pp. 480–487). ACM Press. https://ericdongyx.github.io/papers/ASONAM15_collaboration_signature.pdf
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. London: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124(6), 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082.
Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). New York: W.H. Freeman.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Studying gender and ethnic differences in participation in math, physical science, and information technology. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.146.
Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832368.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.
Ecklund, E. H., & Lincoln, A. E. (2011). Scientists want more children. PLoS One, 6(8), e22590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022590.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363.
European Commission, Directorate-general for research and Innovation. (2019). She figures 2018. https://doi.org/10.2777/936.
European Parliament. (2019). Equality between men and women. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_2.3.8.pdf.
Evers, A., & Sieverding, M. (2015). Academic career intention beyond the PhD: Can the theory of planned behavior explain gender differences? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(3), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12285.
Flanigan, A. E., Kiewra, K. A., & Luo, L. (2018). Conversations with four highly productive German educational psychologists: Frank Fischer, Hans Gruber, Heinz Mandl, and Alexander Renkl. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9392-0.
Fong, C. J., Yoo, J. H., Jones, S. J., Torres, L. G., & Decker, M. L. (2009). Trends in female authorships, editorial board memberships, and editorships in educational psychology journals from 2003 to 2008. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9108-9.
Fotaki, M. (2013). No woman is like a man (in academia): The masculine symbolic order and the unwanted female body. Organization Studies, 34(9), 1251–1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613483658.
Furstenberg, F. F., Cook, T. D., Eccles, J. S., & Elder, G. H. (2000). Managing to make it: Urban families and adolescent success. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garner, R., & Alexander, P. (1982). Strategic processing of text: An investigation of the effects on adults’ question-answering performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 75(3), 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1982.10885371.
Goulden, M., Mason, M. A., & Frasch, K. (2011). Keeping women in the science pipeline. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211416925.
Greenbaum, H. K., Meyer, L., Smith, M. C., Barber, A., Henderson, H., Riel, D., & Robinson, D. H. (2016). Individual and institutional productivity in educational psychology journals from 2009 to 2014. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9360-8.
Greenbaum, H. K., Goodsir, H. L., Smith, M. C., & Robinson, D. H. (2018). Female participation as top-producing authors, editors, and editorial board members in educational psychology journals from 2009 to 2016. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1283–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9452-8.
Haas, M., Koeszegi, S. T., & Zedlacher, E. (2016). Breaking patterns? How female scientists negotiate their token role in their life stories. Gender, Work and Organization, 23(4), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12124.
Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1.
Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Parents’ views of failure predict children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets. Psychological Science, 27(6), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616639727.
Halperin, E., Russell, A. G., Trzesniewski, K. H., Gross, J. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science, 333(6050), 1767–1769. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202925.
Halpern, D. F. (2008). Nurturing careers in psychology: Combining work and family. Educational Psychology Review, 20(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9060-5.
Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 135–145). New York: Springer.
Heijltjes, A., van Gog, T., Leppink, J., & Paas, F. (2015). Unraveling the effects of critical thinking instructions, practice, and self-explanation on students’ reasoning performance. Instructional Science, 43(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9347-8.
Hill, E. J. R., & Giles, J. A. (2014). Career decisions and gender: The illusion of choice? Perspectives on Medical Education, 3(3), 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-014-0128-x.
Hoogerheide, V., van Wermeskerken, M., Loyens, S. M. M., & van Gog, T. (2016). Learning from video modeling examples: Content kept equal, adults are more effective models than peers. Learning and Instruction, 44, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.004.
Howe-Walsh, L., & Turnbull, S. (2016). Barriers to women leaders in academia: Tales from science and technology. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.929102.
Hsieh, P.-H., Acee, T., Chung, W.-H., Hsieh, Y.-P., Kim, H., Thomas, G. D., You, J., & Robinson, D. H. (2004). An alternate look at educational psychologist’s productivity from 1991 to 2002. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.03.002.
Ito, J. K., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2007). Predicting individual research productivity: More than a question of time. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37(1), 1–25.
Jarodzka, H., van Gog, T., Dorr, M., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2013). Learning to see: Guiding students’ attention via a model’s eye movements fosters learning. Learning and Instruction, 25, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.004.
Jones, S. J., Fong, C. J., Torres, L. G., Yoo, J. H., Decker, M. L., & Robinson, D. H. (2010). Productivity in educational psychology journals from 2003 to 2008. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.08.001.
Kiewra, K. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2000). Conversations with three highly productive educational psychologists: Richard Anderson, Richard Mayer, and Michael Pressley. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009041202079.
Kinman, G., & Jones, F. (2008). A life beyond work? Job demands, work-life balance, and wellbeing in UK academics. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 17(1–2), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911350802165478.
Kunter, M., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related interest. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.002.
Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.07.001.
Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.). (2013a). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV Project. New York: Springer.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013b). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583.
Leslie, D. W. (2007). The reshaping of America’s academic workforce (Research Dialogue 87). Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America Institute. https://www.tiaainstitute.org/sites/default/files/presentations/2017-02/87.pdf.
Lindfelt, T., Ip, E. J., Gomez, A., & Barnett, M. J. (2018). The impact of work-life balance on intention to stay in academia: Results from a national survey of pharmacy faculty. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 14(4), 387–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.04.008.
List, A., Grossnickle, E. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Undergraduate students’ justifications for source selection in a digital academic context. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(1), 22–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115606659.
Lunau, T., Bambra, C., Eikemo, T. A., van der Wel, K. A., & Dragano, N. (2014). A balancing act? Work–life balance, health and well-being in European welfare states. European Journal of Public Health, 24(3), 422–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku010.
Mamede, S., Splinter, T. A. W., van Gog, T., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). Exploring the role of salient distracting clinical features in the emergence of diagnostic errors and the mechanisms through which reflection counteracts mistakes. BMJ Quality & Safety, 21(4), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000518.
Maranto, C. L., & Griffin, A. E. (2011). The antecedents of a ‘chilly climate’ for women faculty in higher education. Human Relations, 64(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710377932.
Mayrath, M. C. (2008). Attributions of productive authors in educational psychology journals. Educational Psychology Review, 20(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9059-y.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. New York: Sage.
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.52.
Norman, H., Elliot, M., & Fagan, C. (2018). Does fathers’ involvement in childcare and housework affect couples’ relationship stability? Social Science Quarterly, 99(5), 1599–1613. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12523.
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(422), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422.
Patterson-Hazley, M., & Kiewra, K. A. (2013). Conversations with four highly productive educational psychologists: Patricia Alexander, Richard Mayer, Dale Schunk, and Barry Zimmerman. Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9214-y.
Pew Research Center. (2015). Parenting in America: Outlook, worries, aspirations are strongly linked to financial situation. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/12/2015-12-17_parenting-in-america_FINAL.pdf.
Raaijmakers, S. F., Baars, M., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2018). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills to foster self-regulated learning: Do trained skills transfer across domains? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3392.
Schneider, B. Z., Carden, W., Francisco, A., & Jones Jr., T. O. (2011). Women opting out of academia: At what cost. Forum on Public Policy, 2, 1–19.
Simpkins, S. D., Ripke, M., Huston, A. C., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Predicting participation and outcomes in out-of-school activities: Similarities and differences across social ecologies. New Directions for Youth Development, 105(105), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.107.
Smith, M. C., Locke, S. G., Boisse, S. J., Gallagher, P. A., Krengel, L. E., Kuczek, J. E., McFarland, J. E., Rapoo, B., & Wertheim, C. (1998). Productivity of educational psychologists in educational psychology journals, 1991–1996. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0961.
Smith, M. C., Plant, M., Carney, R. N., Stein Arnold, C., Jackson, A., Johnson, L. S., Lange, H., Mathis, F. S., & Smith, T. J. (2003). Productivity of educational psychologists in educational psychology journals, 1997–2001. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00044-9.
Snyder, T. D., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2019). Digest of education statistics 2018. National Center for education statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020009.pdf.
Tröbst, S., Kleickmann, T., Heinze, A., Bernholt, A., Rink, R., & Kunter, M. (2018). Teacher knowledge experiment: Testing mechanisms underlying the formation of preservice elementary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge concerning fractions and fractional arithmetic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000260.
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2013). Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/publications/upload/EPA-Ledbetter-brochure-8-20-2013-OLC.pdf.
Van Balen, B., van Arensbergen, P., van der Weijden, I., & van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Determinants of success in academic careers. Higher Education Policy, 25(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.14.
Van de Pol, J., de Bruin, A. B. H., van Loon, M. H., & van Gog, T. (2019). Students’ and teachers’ monitoring and regulation of students’ text comprehension: Effects of comprehension cue availability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.001.
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Witte, P. (2005). Uncovering the problem-solving process: Cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.237.
Van Gog, T., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2011). Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem-example pairs on novices’ learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.004.
Voorspoels, J., & Bleijenbergh, I. (2019). Implementing gender quotas in academia: A practice lens. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(4), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-12-2017-0281.
Voss, T., & Kunter, M. (2019). “Reality shock” of beginning teachers? Changes in teacher candidates’ emotional exhaustion and constructivist-oriented beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education 7(3), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119839700.
Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 952–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025125.
Williams, W., & Ceci, S. (2012). When scientists choose motherhood. American Scientist, 100(2), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1511/2012.95.138.
World Economic Forum. (2018). The global gender gap report 2018. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2018.pdf.
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M., Hahn, P. R., Gopalan, M., Mhatre, P., Ferguson, R., Duckworth, A. L., & Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Springer: Sage.
We thank the five scholars for their valuable insights. We thank professor Thamar Voss for providing feedback on the interview questions.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Patricia Alexander’s research family tree
About this article
Cite this article
Prinz, A., Zeeb, H., Flanigan, A.E. et al. Conversations with Five Highly Successful Female Educational Psychologists: Patricia Alexander, Carol Dweck, Jacquelynne Eccles, Mareike Kunter, and Tamara van Gog. Educ Psychol Rev 33, 763–795 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09552-y